Literature DB >> 32709975

Termite mounds contain soil-derived methanotroph communities kinetically adapted to elevated methane concentrations.

Eleonora Chiri1,2,3, Philipp A Nauer2,4, Chris Greening5,6, Rachael Lappan1,3, David W Waite7, Thanavit Jirapanjawat1,3, Xiyang Dong8, Stefan K Arndt9.   

Abstract

Termite mounds have recently been confirmed to mitigate approximately half of termite methane (CH4) emissions, but the aerobic CH4 oxidising bacteria (methanotrophs) responsible for this consumption have not been resolved. Here, we describe the abundance, composition and CH4 oxidation kinetics of the methanotroph communities in the mounds of three distinct termite species sampled from Northern Australia. Results from three independent methods employed show that methanotrophs are rare members of microbial communities in termite mounds, with a comparable abundance but distinct composition to those of adjoining soil samples. Across all mounds, the most abundant and prevalent methane monooxygenase sequences were affiliated with upland soil cluster α (USCα), with sequences homologous to Methylocystis and tropical upland soil cluster (TUSC) also detected. The reconstruction of a metagenome-assembled genome of a mound USCα representative highlighted the metabolic capabilities of this group of methanotrophs. The apparent Michaelis-Menten kinetics of CH4 oxidation in mounds were estimated from in situ reaction rates. Methane affinities of the communities were in the low micromolar range, which is one to two orders of magnitude higher than those of upland soils, but significantly lower than those measured in soils with a large CH4 source such as landfill cover soils. The rate constant of CH4 oxidation, as well as the porosity of the mound material, were significantly positively correlated with the abundance of methanotroph communities of termite mounds. We conclude that termite-derived CH4 emissions have selected for distinct methanotroph communities that are kinetically adapted to elevated CH4 concentrations. However, factors other than substrate concentration appear to limit methanotroph abundance and hence these bacteria only partially mitigate termite-derived CH4 emissions. Our results also highlight the predominant role of USCα in an environment with elevated CH4 concentrations and suggest a higher functional diversity within this group than previously recognised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32709975      PMCID: PMC7784690          DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0722-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  57 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments.

Authors:  A M Costello; M E Lidstrom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Isolation of methanotrophic bacteria from termite gut.

Authors:  Julia Reuss; Reinhard Rachel; Peter Kämpfer; Andreas Rabenstein; Jan Küver; Stefan Dröge; Helmut König
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.415

3.  Genesis of acetate and methane by gut bacteria of nutritionally diverse termites.

Authors:  A Brauman; M D Kane; M Labat; J A Breznak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Termites: a potentially large source of atmospheric methane, carbon dioxide, and molecular hydrogen.

Authors:  P R Zimmerman; J P Greenberg; S O Wandiga; P J Crutzen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related.

Authors:  A J Holmes; A Costello; M E Lidstrom; J C Murrell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 6.  Methanotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  R S Hanson; T E Hanson
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-06

7.  Methane oxidation in termite hindguts: absence of evidence and evidence of absence.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Anne Tholen; Michael W Friedrich; Andreas Brune
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Termites facilitate methane oxidation and shape the methanotrophic community.

Authors:  Adrian Ho; Hans Erens; Basile Bazirake Mujinya; Pascal Boeckx; Geert Baert; Bellinda Schneider; Peter Frenzel; Nico Boon; Eric Van Ranst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Termite mounds mitigate half of termite methane emissions.

Authors:  Philipp A Nauer; Lindsay B Hutley; Stefan K Arndt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Diversity and Habitat Preferences of Cultivated and Uncultivated Aerobic Methanotrophic Bacteria Evaluated Based on pmoA as Molecular Marker.

Authors:  Claudia Knief
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities.

Authors:  Sean K Bay; Xiyang Dong; James A Bradley; Pok Man Leung; Rhys Grinter; Thanavit Jirapanjawat; Stefan K Arndt; Perran L M Cook; Douglas E LaRowe; Philipp A Nauer; Eleonora Chiri; Chris Greening
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 17.745

2.  Termite gas emissions select for hydrogenotrophic microbial communities in termite mounds.

Authors:  Eleonora Chiri; Philipp A Nauer; Rachael Lappan; Thanavit Jirapanjawat; David W Waite; Kim M Handley; Philip Hugenholtz; Perran L M Cook; Stefan K Arndt; Chris Greening
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bark-dwelling methanotrophic bacteria decrease methane emissions from trees.

Authors:  Luke C Jeffrey; Damien T Maher; Eleonora Chiri; Pok Man Leung; Philipp A Nauer; Stefan K Arndt; Douglas R Tait; Chris Greening; Scott G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option?

Authors:  Peter B R Nisbet-Jones; Julianne M Fernandez; Rebecca E Fisher; James L France; David Lowry; David A Waltham; Ceres A Woolley Maisch; Euan G Nisbet
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero.

Authors:  Euan G Nisbet; Edward J Dlugokencky; Rebecca E Fisher; James L France; David Lowry; Martin R Manning; Sylvia E Michel; Nicola J Warwick
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.