| Literature DB >> 32709250 |
Ian W Pray1, Wayne Wakeland2, William Pan3, William E Lambert4, Hector H Garcia5, Armando E Gonzalez6, Seth E O'Neal4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pork tapeworm, Taenia solium, is a serious public health problem in rural low-resource areas of Latin America, Africa and Asia, where the associated conditions of nuerocysticercosis (NCC) and porcine cysticercosis cause substantial health and economic harms. An accurate and validated transmission model for T. solium would serve as an important new tool for control and elimination, as it would allow for comparison of available intervention strategies, and prioritization of the most effective strategies for control and elimination efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Agent-based models; Cysticercosis; Infectious disease modeling; Peru; Taenia solium
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32709250 PMCID: PMC7379812 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04226-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Transmission of Taenia solium in CystiAgent. (1) Pig trade: infected pigs are sold to other households inside and outside the village. (2) Pork consumption: infected pork meat is consumed by humans. (3) Human infection: susceptible humans (S) may be infected (I) with the adult-stage intestinal tapeworm through consuming heavily or lightly infected pork. (4) Travel: humans travel to other endemic villages where they may acquire tapeworm infections. (5) Open defecation: humans may practice open outdoor defecation. (6) Foraging: free-roaming pigs consume potentially infectious eggs present in the environment. (7) Pig infection: susceptible pigs (S) are exposed (E) to eggs or proglottids, and may become infected with heavy (IH) or light (IL) cyst infection
CystiAgent model parameters and plausible ranges used in sensitivity analyses
| Parameter | Code | Distribution | Value | Plausible range | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Village setup | ||||||
| Humans per household | humans-per-hh | Poisson | 3.89 | 3.32 | 4.94 | RST |
| Proportion of households raising pigs | prop-pig-owners | Binomial | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.75 | |
| Pigs per pig-raising household | pigs-per-hh | Exponential | 2.44 | 1.74 | 4.21 | |
| Corral prevalence among pig-owner households | prop-corrals | Binomial | 0.5 | 0.23 | 0.92 | |
| Latrine prevalence | prop-latrines | Binomial | 0.64 | 0.19 | 0.97 | |
| Pig trade | ||||||
| Pig slaughter age (median) | slaughter-age | Log-normal | 9.8 months | 9.5 | 10.0 | RST |
| Proportion of pigs sold prior to slaughter | pigs-sold | Binomial | 0.51 | 0.33 | 0.75 | HH |
| Proportion of sold pigs exported | pigs-exported | Binomial | 0.73 | 0.34 | 1 | HH |
| Rate of pigs imported from endemic areas (imports/pig/week) | pig-import-rate | Uniform | 0.00105 | 0 | 0.00384 | HH |
| Prevalence of cyst infection among imports | import-prev | Binomial | 0.134 | 0 | 0.3 | [ |
| Proportion of infected imported pigs with light cyst burden | light-to-heavy | Binomial | 0.76 | 0.5 | 1 | [ |
| Pork consumption | ||||||
| Proportion of pork consumed by owner | hh-only-pork | Binomial | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.71 | HH |
| Proportion of pork sold after slaughter | sold-pork | Binomial | 0.12 | 0 | 0.5 | HH |
| Proportion of shared pork eaten by owner | shared-pork-hh | Binomial | 0.8 | 0 | 0.84 | HH |
| Human infection | ||||||
| Incubation time to reach tapeworm maturity | tn-incubation | Fixed | 8 weeks | - | - | [ |
| Tapeworm lifespan (mean, SD = 1 year) | tn-lifespan | Normal | 2 years | 0.5 | 4 | |
| Travel | ||||||
| Proportion of households with a frequent traveler | traveler-prop | Binomial | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.65 | HH |
| Frequency of travel to other endemic areas (every × weeks) | travel-freq | Uniform | 8 weeks | 5 | 16 | HH |
| Duration of travel | travel-duration | Exponential | 1.75 weeks | 0.84 | 3.36 | HH |
| Incidence of | travel-incidence | Uniform | 0.00023 | 0.00004 | 0.002 | [ |
| Open defecation | ||||||
| Latrine-use (prop. of households that “always” use latrine) | latrine-use | Binomial | 0.25 | 0 | 0.86 | GPS |
| Radius of environmental contamination (median, meters from home) | cont-radius | Log-normal | 26 meters | 23 | 30 | GPS |
| Rate of egg decay in environment (mean survival duration) | decay-mean | Exponential | 8 weeks | 1 | 26 | [ |
| Foraging | ||||||
| Proportion of pig households with corrals that “always” corral pigs | corral-always | Binomial | 0.05 | 0 | 0.39 | GPS |
| Proportion of pig households with corrals that “sometimes” corral pigs | corral-sometimes | Binomial | 0.57 | 0.25 | 0.61 | |
| Proportion of pigs in “sometimes”-corral-households that are corralled | prop-corral-some | Binomial | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.44 | |
| Radius of pig roaming “home-range” (median) | home-range | Log-normal | 44 meters | 30 | 96 | |
| Tuning parametersa | ||||||
| Probability of human taeniasis upon slaughter of lightly infected pig | pl2h | Binomial | 0.0163 | 0.03 | 0.4 | CAL |
| Probability of human taeniasis upon slaughter of heavily infected pig | ph2h | Binomial | 0.0046 | 0.003 | 0.04 | |
| Probability of light cyst infection upon contact with | light-inf | Binomial | 0.0074 | 0.003 | 0.02 | |
| Probability of heavy cyst infection upon contact with | heavy-inf | Binomial | 0.0059 | 0.003 | 0.02 | |
| Probability of exposure to | light-all | Binomial | 0.0141 | 0 | 0.05 | |
| Probability of exposure to | heavy-all | Binomial | 0.0182 | 0 | 0.05 | |
aListed values for tuning parameters were calibrated to a single test village used to assess baseline model function in Fig. 2
bExposure probabilities (“light-all” and “heavy-all”, x) scaled to the current number of tapeworm carriers (HT) according to 1 − (1–x)HT
Abbreviations: HH, Household survey; GPS, GPS pig tracking study, RST, Ring Strategy; CAL, calibration; SD, standard deviation
Fig. 2Example of model outcomes in three test scenarios. Scenarios tested were endemic equilibrium (top), combined ring treatment (middle), and combined mass treatment (bottom), and outcomes shown are porcine cysticercosis (left) and human taeniasis (right). For each scenario the model was calibrated to a baseline prevalence 23.2% for porcine cysticercosis and 2.9% for human taeniasis. Intervention settings for ring treatment: 87% treatment efficacy for human taeniasis (2-dose niclosamide); 100% treatment efficacy for porcine cysticercosis (oxfendazole); 91% sensitivity of tongue inspection; 85% participation among humans in rings, 60% pig participation. Intervention settings for mass treatment: 77% treatment efficacy for human taeniasis (1-dose niclosamide); 100% treatment efficacy for porcine cysticercosis (oxfendazole); 75% participation among all humans; 60% participation among all pigs
Fig. 3Partial rank correlation coefficients for porcine cysticercosis (left) and human taeniasis (right) in the crude model, medium-density village. Bar colors represent the primary impact of each parameter (blue, human taeniasis; pink, porcine cysticercosis). Parameters in grey (six tuning parameters and five village setup characteristics) were not evaluated in the calibrated model. Only parameters with P-values < 0.0015 are shown. See Table 1 for a description of parameter names and functions
Fig. 4Partial rank correlation coefficients for porcine cysticercosis (left) and human taeniasis (right) in the calibrated model, medium-density village. Bar colors represent the primary impact of each parameter (blue, human taeniasis; pink, porcine cysticercosis). Parameters in bold (“tn-lifespan”, “home-range”, “pigs-sold”, “pigs-exported”, and “latrine-use” represent the five most impactful parameters for both outcomes). Only parameters with P-values < 0.0015 are shown. See Table 1 for a description of parameter names and functions