| Literature DB >> 32708063 |
Alan Dorantes-Morales1, Diego Estrada-Luna1, Rocío Bautista-Pérez1, Gabriel Betanzos-Cabrera2, María Luna-Luna1, Cristóbal Flores-Castillo1, Gilberto Vargas-Alarcón1, José Manuel Fragoso1, Óscar Pérez-Méndez1,3, Elizabeth Carreón-Torres1.
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that pomegranate, which is a source of several bioactive molecules, induces modifications of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) lipid composition and functionality. However, it remains unclear whether the beneficial effects of pomegranate are related to improvement in the lipid components of HDL. Therefore, in this placebo-controlled study, we characterized the size and lipid composition of HDL subclasses and assessed the functionality of these lipoproteins after 30 days of supplementation with a pomegranate microencapsulated (MiPo) in New Zealand white rabbits. We observed a significant decrease in plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-HDL sphingomyelin, as well as increases in HDL cholesterol and HDL phospholipids after supplementation with MiPo. Concomitantly, the triglycerides of the five HDL subclasses isolated by electrophoresis significantly decreased, whereas phospholipids, cholesterol, and sphingomyelin of HDL subclasses, as well as the HDL size distribution remained unchanged. Of particular interest, the triglycerides content of HDL, estimated by the triglycerides-to-phospholipids ratio, decreased significantly after MiPo supplementation. The modification on the lipid content after the supplementation was associated with an increased resistance of HDL to oxidation as determined by the conjugated dienes formation catalyzed by Cu2+. Accordingly, paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity determined with phenylacetate as substrate increased after MiPo. The effect of HDL on endothelial function was analyzed by the response to increasing doses of acetylcholine of aorta rings co-incubated with the lipoproteins in an isolated organ bath. The HDL from rabbits that received placebo partially inhibited the endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In contrast, the negative effect of HDL on endothelial function was reverted by MiPo supplementation. These results show that the beneficial effects of pomegranate are mediated at least in part by improving the functionality of HDL, probably via the reduction of the content of triglycerides in these lipoproteins.Entities:
Keywords: cardioprotective function; high-density lipoprotein; pomegranate microencapsulated; profile lipid; supplementation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32708063 PMCID: PMC7397439 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25143297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Blood glucose levels, weight, lipid profile, and sphingomyelin before and after intervention with microencapsulated pomegranate (MiPo) or placebo group.
| Parameter | Placebo | MiPo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | Baseline | 2.2 (2.0–2.3) a | 2.1 (2.0–2.2) b |
| Glucose | Baseline | 76.6 (66.9–84.5) | 85.0 (76.8–99.4) |
| Total cholesterol | Baseline | 52.5 (45.2–59.2) | 52.3 (45.3–71.7) b |
| Triglycerides | Baseline | 75.8 (60.3–85.1) a | 65.9 (59.2–85.8)b |
| Non-HDL-Cholesterol | Baseline | 20.9 (16.5–28.9) | 29.2 (17.7–40.6) b |
| Sphingomyelin | Baseline | 5.6 (4.8–7.1) | 4.6 (3.9–6.5) |
| Non-HDL-SM | Baseline | 3.8(3.3–4.5) | 3.6 (3.2–4.4) b |
| HDL-C | Baseline | 30.4 (27.2–33.6) a | 32.6 (30.6–34.6) b |
| HDL-Tg | Baseline | 45.2 (23.6–55.4) | 41.1 (33–49.6) b |
| HDL-Pho | Baseline | 52.0 (44.4–61.0) | 60.4 (56.1–64.0) b |
| HDL-SM | Baseline | 1.6 (1.2–1.9) a | 1.5 (1.1–2.2) |
Note: HDL-C: HDL–cholesterol, HDL-Tg: HDL-triglycerides, HDL-Pho: HDL-phospholipids, HDL-SM: HDL-sphingomyelin. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range). Mann–Whitney U test for non-normal distribution. a p < 0.05, vs. after 30 days of administration with the encapsulating agent of MiPo, maltodextrin (Placebo). b p < 0.05, vs. after 30 days of supplementation with MiPo. c p < 0.05, placebo vs. MiPo after 30 days.
Figure 1Lipid plasma concentration ratios of HDL. The ratios were calculated in both MiPo and placebo groups, before (pre-) and after (post-) of 30 days of supplementation with MiPo or administration with maltodextrin as placebo (Pbo). (A) HDL-cholesterol-to-phospholipids ratio. (B) HDL-triglycerides-to-phospholipids ratio. (C) HDL-sphingomyelin-to-phospholipids ratio. Data are expressed as median (horizontal lines) and interquartile range (boxes). Mann–Whitney U test. a p < 0.05 Baseline (pre-) vs. after 30 days of supplementation with MiPo (post-).
Lipid composition of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) subclasses.
| HDL Lipids | Placebo | MiPo | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| HDL 2b | Baseline | 12.1 (8.7–15.6) | 11.8 (6.9–16.7) |
| HDL 2a | Baseline | 4.7 (3.4–6.0) a | 4.6 (3.9–5.2) a |
| HDL 3a | Baseline | 6.7 (5.5–7.9) | 8.3 (6.1–10.6) b |
| HDL 3b | Baseline | 2.8 (2.1–3.5) | 3.6 (2.3–4.9) |
| HDL 3c | Baseline | 3.5 (1.1–5.9) | 4.0 (1.4–6.5) b |
|
| |||
| HDL 2b | Baseline | 17.5 (4.9–30.1) | 16.6 (8.0–25.3) |
| HDL 2a | Baseline | 6.1 (2.2–10.1) | 5.7 (3.3–8.4) b |
| HDL 3a | Baseline | 9.0 (2.9–15.1) | 9.6 (4.8–14.4) b |
| HDL 3b | Baseline | 4.3 (2.9–7.6) | 5.0 (2.1–7.9) b |
| HDL 3c | Baseline | 4.5 (3.1–6.3) | 4.9 (1.1–8.7) b |
|
| |||
| HDL 2b | Baseline | 22.6 (10.2–35.8) | 24.6 (15.8–33.3) |
| HDL 2a | Baseline | 8.2 (6.3–10.1) | 8.5 (6.4–10.7) |
| HDL 3a | Baseline | 11.8 (8.7–14.8) | 15.6 (8.2–23.0) |
| HDL 3b | Baseline | 5.1 (1.5–8.6) | 6.7 (2.1–11.3) |
| HDL 3c | Baseline | 4.9 (1.9–10.7) | 4.1 (1.2–8.4) |
|
| |||
| HDL 2b | Baseline | 0.7 (0.3–1.7) | 0.8 (0.6–1.6) |
| HDL 2a | Baseline | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 0.3 (0.1–0.5) |
| HDL 3a | Baseline | 0.4 (0.2–0.6) | 0.4 (0.2–0.7) |
| HDL 3b | Baseline | 0.1(0.1–0.2) | 0.2 (0.0–0.3) |
| HDL 3c | Baseline | 0.2 (0.1–0.2) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) |
Note: Data are expressed as median (interquartile range). Mann–Whitney U test. a p < 0.05 vs. after 30 days of administration with the encapsulating agent of MiPo, maltodextrin (Placebo). b p < 0.05 vs. after 30 days of supplementation with MiPo, c p < 0.05, vs. after 30 days of supplementation with placebo.
Figure 2Effect of MiPo on the resistance to oxidation of HDL. The conjugated dienes formation catalyzed by Cu2+ was determined within HDL from rabbits, before (pre-MiPo) and after (post-MiPo) supplementation with microencapsulated pomegranate. (A) Kinetics of conjugated dienes formation determined by spectrophotometry at 234 nm; the curves represent the calculated mean of the individual kinetics pre-MiPo (solid line, n = 6) and post-MiPo (dashed line, n = 6), normalized to the same initial value. (B) Calculated lag time (t lag); horizontal lines and boxes represent the median and interquartile range, respectively. Mann–Whitney U test, a p < 0.05, pre- vs. post-MiPo.
Figure 3Effect of MiPo on paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity. PON1 activity was determined in both MiPo and placebo groups, before (pre-) and after (post-) 30 days of supplementation with MiPo or administration with the encapsulating agent of MiPo, maltodextrin (Pbo). Data are expressed as median (horizontal lines) and interquartile range (boxes). Mann–Whitney U test. a p < 0.05, pre- vs. post-MiPo; b p < 0.05, placebo vs. MiPo after 30 days.
Figure 4Effect of MiPo on endothelial-dependent relaxation of rabbit aortic rings incubated with HDL from rabbits. Curves represent the percentage of relaxation of pre-contracted aorta rings with phenylephrine as a function of the logarithm of increasing acetylcholine concentration. Aorta rings were incubated with HDL from rabbits after 30 days of supplementation with MiPo (post-MiPo, black triangles) and administration with the encapsulating agent of MiPo, maltodextrin (post-Pbo; black squares). Each point represents the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM; n = 6). As reference, a curve of aorta rings without HDL is included (non-HDL, black circles). ANOVA, Least significant difference (LSD) post-hoc test, a p < 0.05 vs. control, b p < 0.05 vs. MiPo after 30 days of supplementation.