| Literature DB >> 32707637 |
Jihong Liu1, Meilin Liu1, Yu Bai1, Jiahao Zhang1, Hongwei Liu1, Wenbin Zhu1.
Abstract
With the development of flexible electronic materials, as well as the wide development and application of smartphones, the cloud, and wireless systems, flexible wearable sensor technology has a significant and far-reaching impact on the realization of personalized medical care and the reform of the consumer market in the future. However, due to the high requirements for accuracy, reliability, low power consumption, and less data error, the development of these potential areas is full of challenges. In order to solve these problems, this review mainly searches the literature from 2008 to May 2020, based on the PRISMA process. Based on them, this paper reviews the latest research progress of new flexible materials and different types of sensors for monitoring vital signs (including electrophysiological signals, body temperature, and respiratory frequency) in recent years. These materials and sensors can help realize accurate signal detection based on comfortable and sustainable observation, and may likely be applied to future daily clothing.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical monitoring; flexible electronics; health monitoring; wearable devices
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32707637 PMCID: PMC7411849 DOI: 10.3390/s20144009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Comparation for flexible sensors for vital sign monitoring.
| Vital Signs | Materials | Key Features | Limitations | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact sensor | ECG/EMG | Ag NW/PDMS | Anti-microbial, Eliminated motion artifacts | Material oxidation | [ |
| ECG | Polymer/Ag NWs electrode | Highly stretchable, low sensing limit, and good durability | Requires tight contact | [ | |
| ECG | Graphene, textile | Easy to make | High noise | [ | |
| ECG | PEDOT: PSS, LIG | Prolonged stability, High waveform quality | Prone to motion artifact | [ | |
| ECG/EMG | PDMS | Scalable, less skin irritation | Prone to motion artifact | [ | |
| ECG | Ag/AgCl | Wi-Fi wireless transmission | High power consumption, short lifespan | [ | |
| ECG | Ag/AgCl | Low power consumption, dry 3D printed electrodes | Short battery lifespan | [ | |
| EMG | Ag, nylon plastic | Convenient, real time processed | Data accuracy | [ | |
| Non-contact sensor | ECG/EMG/EEG | PS25255 EPIC | Portability, long-term monitoring | Poor tight contact, prone to motion | [ |
| ECG/EMG/EEG | Flexible printed circuits (FPC) | Flexible, no obvious power frequency noise | Baseline drift exists | [ | |
| ECG | ASOPA4002 | Completely flexible and ultra-thin | High power consumption | [ | |
| ECG | Silicone-based sensors | Comfortable, noise immunization | Short monitoring period | [ | |
| ECG | Silicone dry electrode | Reliable, low power consumption, low cost, | Irregular waveforms, low CR | [ | |
| ECG | PDMS-Graphene | Textile based, high quality | Limited stability | [ | |
| ECG | Graphene | Soft, low cost, scalable | Contact impedance exists | [ | |
| Implant-able sensor | Peripheral neural signals | TiO2, silicone | Good biocompatibility | Unknown mechanical properties | [ |
| ECG | PI, AU/Ti | Flexible, robust performance | High impedance | [ | |
| ECG | Ag/AgCl | Low noise, good biocompatibility | High power consumption | [ |
Figure 1Non-implantable flexible electrophysiological signal sensors: (a) schematic diagram of the transfer process and a photograph of the transparent graphene on plastic substrate [29] © 2013 IEEE; (b) Schematic image of wearable patches [31] © 2018 IEEE; (c) Ag NW electrodes on the forearm for EMG sensing (with black caps) and the ground/reference electrode (with green cap) [6]; (d) Camera pictures of electrodes in the case of stretching [3]; (e) PDMS flexible micropipette array [37]; (f) Pictures of the front and back of the flexible non-contact electrode [15] © 2019 IEEE.
Figure 2Implantable flexible sensors: (a) four independent probes implanted into the mouse visual cortex [46] © 2014 IEEE; (b) flexible SiC-on-PI devices wrapped around a curved surface (diameter = 12 mm) [48]; (c) the electrode sample prepared in this work. Dimensions (L = 5 cm, W = 0.6 cm and t = 0.2 cm) [21] © 2018 IEEE; photos of implants used in (d) biocompatibility tests; (e) photos of implants used in biocompatibility tests; (f) polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) encapsulated and (g) non encapsulated electrodes [22].
Figure 3Contact wearable monitoring sensors: (a) Arm-mounted electrocardiograph (ECG) acquisition equipment [10]; (b) data transmission between infrared PPG transmission belt and USB and a comparison of PPG/ECG signals in the multiple access system [55]; (c) bottom view of the case of the electrode in contact with the wrist [11] © 2018 IEEE; and (d) the electrodes were placed at eleven positions on the head and neck. [58] © 2016 IEEE.
Figure 4Wearable lightweight sensors: (a–c) multifunctional epidermal electronic system (EES) on skin: undeformed (a), compressed (b), and stretched (c); (d) the spectrogram of the alpha rhythm. The first and next 10 s correspond to periods when the eyes were closed and open, respectively. The responses at ~10 and ~14 s correspond to eye opening and blinking, respectively [63]; (e) optical image (left) of the organic electrochemical transistor (OECT)-based sensor on the skin and schematic of its circuit layout (right) [65]; (f) photograph of the wearable system for real-time visual monitoring of the ECG signals [66]; (g) photograph of ultrathin, gas-permeable nanomesh electrodes fitted with the skin [67] © 2020 IEEE.
Figure 5Non-contact sensors: (a) insulation electrode and experimental device; (b) two different products of OM garments (the OM shirt for men and the OM bra for women [17]); (c) the design of sandwich cushion improves the motion artifact [19] © 2020 IEEE.
Figure 6System improvement: (a) zoomed-up image of a pixel integrated with four strain sensors, two temperature sensors, and a fingerprint like structure © 2019 IEEE; (b) comparison between estimated and given true heart rate for noisy data for matched case using random forest regression with all model features [82] © 2019 IEEE; (c) the whole process of handling the flexible and stretchable electrodes [64] © 2014 IEEE; (d) wearable ECG monitoring device.
Figure 7Respiratory monitoring sensors: (a) PDMS-graphene compound prototype after the manufacture process and (b) a tensile sensor after cutting [86] © 2019 IEEE; (c) schematic diagram of a flexible strain sensor with the inset showing the grid part and (d) a sensor attached to the skin [93] © 2016 IEEE; (e) the flexible fiber-based Bragg grating (FBG) proposed in this work [98] © 2019 IEEE.
Figure 8Thermistor temperature sensors: (a) schematic diagram of graphene–nickel nanocomposite temperature sensor on a flexible PCB [100] © 2017 IEEE; (b) picture of a screen-printed thermistor composed of nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles and PSBR adhesive on a Kapton-PI substrate. The four thermistors were labeled t1, t2, t3 and t4, respectively [101]; (c) profile and top view of the sensor [102]; (d) DTS layout diagram and (e) DTS connection diagram [104] © 2019 IEEE; (f) actual image of the stretchable graphene thermistor [105].; (g) the design structure of the Y-shaped sensor, showing the location of the three pairs of thermistors and the usage of the three heat flows [107] © 2018 IEEE.
Figure 9Thermoelectric sensors: (a) polymer positive temperature coefficient (PTC) sensor; (b) the picture shows the variation of resistance temperature characteristics of the single polymer PTC sensor. The reaction temperature of the sensor varies with the content of octadecyl acrylate from 75% to 100% [111] © 2016 IEEE; (c) the size of the flexible TE device [109]; (d) fixed-area fabrics; (e) devices fabricated on flexible Kapton substrate and (f) the device attached to the human body [110].