Literature DB >> 32707236

Noxious pressure stimulation demonstrates robust, reliable estimates of brain activity and self-reported pain.

Jade B Jackson1, Owen O'Daly2, Elena Makovac3, Sonia Medina3, Alfonso de Lara Rubio2, Stephen B McMahon4, Steve C R Williams2, Matthew A Howard2.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging techniques have provided great insight in the field of pain. Utilising these techniques, we have characterised pain-induced responses in the brain and improved our understanding of key pain-related phenomena. Despite the utility of these methods, there remains a need to assess the test retest reliability of pain modulated blood-oxygen-level-dependant (BOLD) MR signal across repeated sessions. This is especially the case for more novel yet increasingly implemented stimulation modalities, such as noxious pressure, and it is acutely important for multi-session studies considering treatment efficacy. In the present investigation, BOLD signal responses were estimated for noxious-pressure stimulation in a group of healthy participants, across two separate sessions. Test retest reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and self-reported visual analogue scale measures were determined by the intra-class correlation coefficient. High levels of reliability were observed in several key brain regions known to underpin the pain experience, including in the thalamus, insula, somatosensory cortices, and inferior frontal regions, alongside "excellent" reliability of self-reported pain measures. These data demonstrate that BOLD-fMRI derived signals are a valuable tool for quantifying noxious responses pertaining to pressure stimulation. We further recommend the implementation of pressure as a stimulation modality in experimental applications.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evoked-response fMRI; ICC; Noxious pressure; Pain; Test retest; VAS

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32707236      PMCID: PMC7762811          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Neuroimaging Assessment of Pain.

Authors:  Bo Gou; Xue-Qiang Wang; Jing Luo; Hui-Qi Zhu
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.088

2.  Effect sizes and test-retest reliability of the fMRI-based neurologic pain signature.

Authors:  Xiaochun Han; Yoni K Ashar; Philip Kragel; Bogdan Petre; Victoria Schelkun; Lauren Y Atlas; Luke J Chang; Marieke Jepma; Leonie Koban; Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Mathieu Roy; Choong-Wan Woo; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Imaging Brain Glx Dynamics in Response to Pressure Pain Stimulation: A 1H-fMRS Study.

Authors:  Luke A Jelen; David J Lythgoe; Jade B Jackson; Matthew A Howard; James M Stone; Alice Egerton
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  A Multisensory fMRI Investigation of Nociceptive-Preferential Cortical Regions and Responses.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Zhang; Linling Li; Gan Huang; Li Zhang; Zhen Liang; Li Shi; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The immediate effect of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and the autonomic nervous system in subjects with persistent pain, a pilot study.

Authors:  Rob Sillevis; Gabriel Trincado; Eric Shamus
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.