Literature DB >> 32707185

Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis.

Jianqiang Wang1, Heye Huang2, Yang Li3, Hanchu Zhou4, Jinxin Liu5, Qing Xu6.   

Abstract

Traffic accident statistics have shown the necessity of risk assessment when driving in the dynamic traffic environment. If the risk associated with different traffic elements (i.e., road, environment and vehicles) could be evaluated accurately, potential accidents could be significantly avoided or mitigated. This paper proposes a driving risk assessment model that can quantitatively evaluate the driving risk associated with intelligent vehicles via the coupled analysis of different traffic elements. First, we present a concept of the internal field and external field for establishing the driving risk coupling model, through employing the internal field to define the risk range of driver's perspective and the external field to calculate the risk coefficients of those traffic elements. Then, the relative risk coefficients are computed by incorporating both naturalistic driving study (NDS) and driver attitude questionnaire (DAQ) using a multinomial logit model. Specifically, we perform a large-scale naturalistic driving study to investigate the objective driving risks. Typical driver behavior parameters, such as velocity, time headway, and acceleration, are analyzed. Besides, a self-reported survey of 364 drivers is conducted to subjectively evaluate the potential risks that drivers may face in various situations. Finally, validation of the model is conducted by comparing the accuracy with the typical risk assessment index, i.e., TTC and THW. Results demonstrate that the proposed approach is effective in evaluating the comprehensive driving risks by quantifying the influence factors of driving risks in dynamic environments.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driver attitude questionnaire; Driving risk coupling model; Intelligent vehicles; Internal and external field; Naturalistic driving study

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32707185     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  3 in total

1.  Data-Driven Estimation of a Driving Safety Tolerance Zone Using Imbalanced Machine Learning.

Authors:  Thodoris Garefalakis; Christos Katrakazas; George Yannis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Review of Research on Road Traffic Operation Risk Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Yongji Ma; Jinliang Xu; Chao Gao; Minghao Mu; Guangxun E; Chenwei Gu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Driving Risk Assessment Using Near-Miss Events Based on Panel Poisson Regression and Panel Negative Binomial Regression.

Authors:  Shuai Sun; Jun Bi; Montserrat Guillen; Ana M Pérez-Marín
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.524

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.