Literature DB >> 32707062

Categorical Rhythms Are Shared between Songbirds and Humans.

Tina C Roeske1, Ofer Tchernichovski2, David Poeppel3, Nori Jacoby4.   

Abstract

Rhythm is a prominent feature of music. Of the infinite possible ways of organizing events in time, musical rhythms are almost always distributed categorically. Such categories can facilitate the transmission of culture-a feature that songbirds and humans share. We compared rhythms of live performances of music to rhythms of wild thrush nightingale and domestic zebra finch songs. In nightingales, but not in zebra finches, we found universal rhythm categories, with patterns that were surprisingly similar to those of music. Isochronous 1:1 rhythms were similarly common. Interestingly, a bias toward small ratios (around 1:2 to 1:3), which is highly abundant in music, was observed also in thrush nightingale songs. Within that range, however, there was no statistically significant bias toward exact integer ratios (1:2 or 1:3) in the birds. High-ratio rhythms were abundant in the nightingale song and are structurally similar to fusion rhythms (ornaments) in music. In both species, preferred rhythms remained invariant over extended ranges of tempos, indicating natural categories. The number of rhythm categories decreased at higher tempos, with a threshold above which rhythm became highly stereotyped. In thrush nightingales, this threshold occurred at a tempo twice faster than in humans, indicating weaker structural constraints and a remarkable motor proficiency. Together, the results suggest that categorical rhythms reflect similar constraints on learning motor skills across species. The saliency of categorical rhythms across humans and thrush nightingales suggests that they promote, or emerge from, the cultural transmission of learned vocalizations. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bio-musicology; birdsong; categorical rhythm; cross-cultural comparison; finger tapping; inter-species comparison; learned vocalizations; music; rhythm production

Year:  2020        PMID: 32707062      PMCID: PMC7511425          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  30 in total

1.  Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song.

Authors:  O Tchernichovski; P P Mitra; T Lints; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Studying synchronization to a musical beat in nonhuman animals.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel; John R Iversen; Micah R Bregman; Irena Schulz
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Integer Ratio Priors on Musical Rhythm Revealed Cross-culturally by Iterated Reproduction.

Authors:  Nori Jacoby; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  The Evolution of Rhythm Processing.

Authors:  S A Kotz; A Ravignani; W T Fitch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Neural mechanisms for the coordination of duet singing in wrens.

Authors:  Eric S Fortune; Carlos Rodríguez; David Li; Gregory F Ball; Melissa J Coleman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Universality and diversity in human song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Dean Knox; Daniel M Ketter; Daniel Pickens-Jones; S Atwood; Christopher Lucas; Nori Jacoby; Alena A Egner; Erin J Hopkins; Rhea M Howard; Joshua K Hartshorne; Mariela V Jennings; Jan Simson; Constance M Bainbridge; Steven Pinker; Timothy J O'Donnell; Max M Krasnow; Luke Glowacki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Peripheral mechanisms for vocal production in birds - differences and similarities to human speech and singing.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 9.  On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment.

Authors:  Bjorn H Merker; Guy S Madison; Patricia Eckerdal
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  The evolution of the syrinx: An acoustic theory.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Scott L Thomson; Ingo R Titze; Franz Goller
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hierarchical amplitude modulation structures and rhythm patterns: Comparing Western musical genres, song, and nature sounds to Babytalk.

Authors:  Tatsuya Daikoku; Usha Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Modeling enculturated bias in entrainment to rhythmic patterns.

Authors:  Thomas Kaplan; Jonathan Cannon; Lorenzo Jamone; Marcus Pearce
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Higher-Order Musical Temporal Structure in Bird Song.

Authors:  Hans T Bilger; Emily Vertosick; Andrew Vickers; Konrad Kaczmarek; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Musicality in human vocal communication: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Juan David Leongómez; Jan Havlíček; S Craig Roberts
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Syntactic modulation of rhythm in Australian pied butcherbird song.

Authors:  Jeffrey Xing; Tim Sainburg; Hollis Taylor; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.653

6.  Vocal learning and flexible rhythm pattern perception are linked: Evidence from songbirds.

Authors:  Andrew A Rouse; Aniruddh D Patel; Mimi H Kao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.