| Literature DB >> 32706660 |
Jong-Long Guo1, Vivian Ya-Wen Cheng2, Chiu-Mieh Huang3, Jung-Yu Liao4, Hsiao-Pei Hsu3, Shih-Wen Wang1, Su-Fei Huang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Taiwan, which has one of the most rapidly aging populations in the world, it is becoming increasingly critical to promote successful aging strategies that are effective, easily usable, and acceptable to institutionalized older adults. Although many practitioners and professionals have explored aromatherapy and identified its psychological benefits, the effectiveness of combining 3-dimensional (3D) virtual reality and hands-on aromatherapy remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: aromatherapy; happiness; life satisfaction; meditation; older adult; sleep quality; stress; three-dimensional; virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32706660 PMCID: PMC7428146 DOI: 10.2196/17096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1Flowchart of participant enrollment and assessment. 3D: 3-dimensional. VR: virtual reality.
Figure 2Examples of the 3D VR and hands-on aromatherapy program. 3D: 3-dimensional. VR: virtual reality.
Figure 3Changes in happiness, perceived stress, sleep quality, meditation, and life satisfaction between experimental and control groups.
Results of generalized estimating equation analyses.
|
| GEEa coefficient | SE | 95% Wald CI | Wald chi-square ( | ||||
|
|
|
| Lower | Upper |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Group (experimental group)b | –1.17 | 2.74 | –6.53 | 4.20 | 0.2 (1) | .67 | |
|
| Time (posttest)c | –2.50 | 0.79 | –4.05 | –0.95 | 9.9 (1) | .002 | |
|
| Group (experimental group) × time (posttest)d | 12.58 | 1.84 | 8.98 | 16.19 | 46.8 (1) | <.001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Group (experimental group)b | –3.96 | 2.38 | –8.63 | 0.72 | 2.8 (1) | .10 | |
|
| Time (posttest)c | –0.25 | 0.73 | –1.68 | 1.18 | 0.1 (1) | .73 | |
|
| Group (experimental group) × time (posttest)d | 12.00 | 1.72 | 8.64 | 15.36 | 48.9 (1) | <.001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Group (experimental group)b | –0.72 | 0.97 | –2.63 | 1.18 | .6 (1) | .46 | |
|
| Time (posttest)c | 0.64 | 0.39 | –0.12 | 1.40 | 2.7 (1) | .10 | |
|
| Group (experimental group) × time (posttest)d | –4.72 | 0.65 | –5.99 | –3.45 | 53.2 (1) | <.001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Group (experimental group)b | –3.01 | 1.50 | –5.94 | –0.07 | 4.0 (1) | .04 | |
|
| Time (posttest)c | –1.79 | 0.59 | –2.95 | –0.63 | 9.2 (1) | .002 | |
|
| Group (experimental group) × time (posttest)d | 11.92 | 1.33 | 9.32 | 14.52 | 80.7 (1) | <.001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Group (experimental group)b | 0.25 | 0.59 | –0.90 | 1.40 | 0.2 (1) | .67 | |
|
| Time (posttest)c | 0.08 | 0.17 | –0.24 | 0.41 | 0.3 (1) | .62 | |
|
| Group (experimental group) × time (posttest)d | 1.79 | 0.42 | 0.97 | 2.61 | 18.4 (1) | <.001 | |
aGEE: generalized estimating equation.
bReference group (group): control group.
cReference group (time): pretest.
dReference group (group time): control group pretest.