Literature DB >> 32706615

Rapid Decline in Telestroke Consults in the Setting of COVID-19.

Syed Omar Shah1, Robin Dharia2, Jaime Stazi1, Maureen DePrince1, Robert H Rosenwasser1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose: As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be a global pandemic, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that incidence of diseases that require emergent care, particularly myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, has declined rapidly. The objective of this study is to quantify our experience of telestroke (TS) consults at a large tertiary comprehensive stroke center during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed TS consults of patients presenting to our neuroscience network. Those with a confirmed diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemia attack were included. Data were compared from April 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020, which include consults prepandemic and during the crisis.
Results: A total of 1,982 TS consults were provided in 1 year. Prepandemic, the mean monthly consults were 148. In April 2020, only 59 patients were seen (49% decline). Mobile stroke unit consults decreased by 72% in the same month. The 30-day moving average of patients seen per day was between five and six prepandemic declined to between two and three in April, and then began to uptrend during May. The mean percentage of patients receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was 16% from April 2019 to March 2020 and increased to 31% in April 2020. The mean percentage of patients receiving endovascular therapy was 10% from April 2019 to March 2020 and increased to 19% in April 2020. Conclusions: At our large tertiary comprehensive stroke center, we observed a significant and rapid decline in TS consults during the COVID-19 pandemic. We cannot be certain of the reasons for the decline, but a fear of contracting coronavirus, social distancing, and isolation likely played a major role. Further research must be done to elucidate the etiology of this decline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; stroke; telemedicine; telestroke

Year:  2020        PMID: 32706615     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  4 in total

1.  Slump in Hospital Admissions for Stroke, a Fact of an Uncertain Nature That Requires Explanation.

Authors:  José M Ramírez-Moreno; Juan Carlos Portilla-Cuenca; Roshan Hariramani-Ramchandani; Belen Rebollo; Inés Bermejo Casado; Pablo Macías-Sedas; David Ceberino; Ana M Roa-Montero; Alberto González-Plata; Ignacio Casado; Luis Fernández de Alarcón
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 2.  Telestroke's Role Through the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.

Authors:  Ehab Harahsheh; Stephen W English; Courtney M Hrdlicka; Bart Demaerschalk
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.972

3.  Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on stroke teleconsultations in Germany in the first half of 2020.

Authors:  Christoph Vollmuth; Olga Miljukov; Mazen Abu-Mugheisib; Anselm Angermaier; Jessica Barlinn; Loraine Busetto; Armin J Grau; Albrecht Guenther; Christoph Gumbinger; Nikolai Hubert; Katrin Hüttemann; Carsten Klingner; Markus Naumann; Frederick Palm; Jan Remi; Viktoria Rücker; Joachim Schessl; Felix Schlachetzki; Ramona Schuppner; Stefan Schwab; Andreas Schwartz; Adrian Trommer; Christian Urbanek; Bastian Volbers; Joachim Weber; Claudia Wojciechowski; Hans Worthmann; Philipp Zickler; Peter U Heuschmann; Karl Georg Haeusler; Gordian Jan Hubert
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Acute telestroke evaluations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Alejandro Vargas; Nicholas D Osteraas; Rima M Dafer; Laurel J Cherian; Sarah Y Song; James J Conners
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.