Literature DB >> 32706182

Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.

Amit Patel1,2, Nicola Cooper2,3, Suzanne Freeman2,3, Alex Sutton2,3.   

Abstract

Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews are conducted to summarize evidence on the accuracy of a diagnostic test including a critical evaluation of the primary studies. Where appropriate, the evidence is meta-analyzed to obtain pooled estimates of effectiveness.In this study, we reviewed and critiqued three DTA guidance documents with respect to the graphical presentation of DTA meta-analysis results. All three documents recommended the use of two forms of graphical presentation: (a) forest plots displaying meta-analysis results for sensitivity (ie, the true positive rate) and specificity (ie, true negative rate) separately, and (b) Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve to provide a global summary of test performance. Two primary shortcomings were identified: (a) lack of incorporation of quality assessment results into the main analysis and; (b) ambiguity with which the contribution of individual studies is represented on SROC curves. In response, two alternative graphical approaches were developed: A quality assessment enhanced SROC plot which displays the results from individual studies in the meta-analysis with multiple indicators of quality assessed using QUADAS-2; and A percentage study weights enhanced SROC plot which accurately portrays the percentage contribution each study makes to the meta-analysis. The proposed enhanced SROC curves facilitate the exploration of DTA data, leading to a deeper understanding of the primary studies included in a DTA meta-analysis including identifying reasons for between study heterogeneity and why specific study results may be divergent. Both plots can easily be produced in the free online interactive application, MetaDTA (https://crsu.shinyapps.io/dta_ma/).
© 2020 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; received operating characteristic curves

Year:  2020        PMID: 32706182     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.

Authors:  Samuel T Creavin; Anna H Noel-Storr; Ryan J Langdon; Edo Richard; Alexandra L Creavin; Sarah Cullum; Sarah Purdy; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessia Blundo; Arianna Cignoni; Tommaso Banfi; Gastone Ciuti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests Assessing Ligamentous Injury of the Talocrural and Subtalar Joints: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fredh Netterström-Wedin; Mark Matthews; Chris Bleakley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Gatti; Guglielmo Gallone; Vittoria Poggi; Francesco Bruno; Alessandro Serafini; Alessandro Depaoli; Ovidio De Filippo; Federico Conrotto; Fatemeh Darvizeh; Riccardo Faletti; Gaetano Maria De Ferrari; Paolo Fonio; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Maxillofacial Fractures: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Srikanth Gadicherla; Kalyana-Chakravarthy Pentapati; Nasrullah Rustaqi; Anupam Singh; Komal Smriti
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2021-09-21

6.  Comparing Biomarkers for Predicting Pathological Responses to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fuxing Zhao; Xingfa Huo; Miaozhou Wang; Zhen Liu; Yi Zhao; Dengfeng Ren; Qiqi Xie; Zhilin Liu; Zitao Li; Feng Du; Guoshuang Shen; Jiuda Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Synovial fluid calprotectin in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashraf T Hantouly; Motasem Salameh; Ahmad A Toubasi; Loay A Salman; Osama Alzobi; Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Shamsi Hameed; Bashir Zikria; Ghalib Ahmed
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Differentiating Parkinson's Disease from Essential Tremor Using Transcranial Sonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Beatrice Heim; Marina Peball; Johannes Hammermeister; Atbin Djamshidian; Florian Krismer; Klaus Seppi
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 5.520

9.  Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ABeta42 for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia in participants diagnosed with any dementia subtype in a specialist care setting.

Authors:  Michelle Kokkinou; Lucy C Beishon; Nadja Smailagic; Anna H Noel-Storr; Chris Hyde; Obioha Ukoumunne; Rosemary E Worrall; Anja Hayen; Meera Desai; Abhishekh Hulegar Ashok; Eleanor J Paul; Aikaterini Georgopoulou; Tiziana Casoli; Terry J Quinn; Craig W Ritchie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-10

10.  Performance of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in predicting response to inhaled corticosteroids in chronic cough: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pasquale Ambrosino; Mariasofia Accardo; Marco Mosella; Antimo Papa; Salvatore Fuschillo; Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato; Andrea Motta; Mauro Maniscalco
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.