Literature DB >> 32705752

Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review.

Michele S Y Biddle1, Andy Gibson1, David Evans1.   

Abstract

The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) is making great strides in promoting patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research across Europe, supporting patient organisations to be involved in the projects that it funds. Despite this, the literature around PPI in health services and research originating from European countries appears less than from the United Kingdom (UK), where PPI is well established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to explore the attitudes and approaches to PPI across Europe. Eight scientific databases were systematically searched and data extracted. Data quality was assessed using a checklist based on the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) (Staniszewska et al., Research, Involvement and Engagement, 3, 13, 2017) and the critical appraisal guidelines developed by Wright et al. (Health Expectations, 13, 359, 2010). We included all studies reporting PPI activity in both public and private health services and research institutions in the World Health Organization European region, excluding the UK, published in the English language from 1996 to 2018. Forty studies in total were included in the analysis. The studies imply a growing interest and support for the idea of PPI in health services and, to a lesser extent, in health research. There seems to be a convergence of conceptualisations of PPI across Europe, with internationally significant areas of innovative work taking place in countries such as the Netherlands and the Scandinavian countries. However, the implementation of PPI is highly uneven, and PPI is not yet firmly embedded or adequately formalised in European healthcare systems and research, possibly due to a lack of infrastructure, guidance and support. In order to try to get a better understanding of what is happening on the ground, we are carrying out a survey with potential follow-up interviews as the next part of this research project. This work is currently on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
© 2020 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; approaches; attitudes; health research; health services; patient involvement; public involvement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32705752     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  9 in total

1.  Awareness of and attitudes towards public involvement in research on ageing and health among older people in Sweden.

Authors:  Joakim Frögren; Steven M Schmidt; Maya Kylén; Oskar Jonsson; Björn Slaug; Susanne Iwarsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  How common is patient and public involvement (PPI)? Cross-sectional analysis of frequency of PPI reporting in health research papers and associations with methods, funding sources and other factors.

Authors:  Iain Lang; Angela King; Georgia Jenkins; Kate Boddy; Zohrah Khan; Kristin Liabo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Citizen Consultation on Problematic Usage of the Internet: Ethical Considerations and Empirical Insights From Six Countries.

Authors:  Biljana Gjoneska; Julia Jones; Anna Maria Vella; Philip Bonanno; Katerina Flora; Andrés Fontalba-Navas; Natalie Hall; Liljana Ignjatova; Zviad Kirtava; Daniel Moreno Sanjuán; Maria Piedade Vaz-Rebelo; Célia M D Sales
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again.

Authors:  Barbara Groot; Annyk Haveman; Mireille Buree; Ruud van Zuijlen; Juliette van Zuijlen; Tineke Abma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Developing and testing guidance to support researchers engaging patient partners in health-related research.

Authors:  Jeanette Finderup; Louise Engelbrecht Buur; Sarah Cecilie Tscherning; Annesofie Lunde Jensen; Anne Wilhøft Kristensen; Anne Poder Petersen; Bente Skovsby Toft; Gitte Susanne Rasmussen; Pernille Skovlund; Tina Wang Vedelø; Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-08-26

6.  Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Sosei Yamaguchi; Makiko Abe; Takayuki Kawaguchi; Momoka Igarashi; Takuma Shiozawa; Makoto Ogawa; Naonori Yasuma; Sayaka Sato; Yuki Miyamoto; Chiyo Fujii
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  User involvement in ageing and health research: a survey of researchers' and older adults' perspectives.

Authors:  Maya Kylén; Björn Slaug; Oskar Jonsson; Susanne Iwarsson; Steven M Schmidt
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 8.  Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future.

Authors:  Daniel Masterson; Kristina Areskoug Josefsson; Glenn Robert; Elisabeth Nylander; Sofia Kjellström
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 9.  Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gloria A Aguayo; Catherine Goetzinger; Renza Scibilia; Aurélie Fischer; Till Seuring; Viet-Thi Tran; Philippe Ravaud; Tamás Bereczky; Laetitia Huiart; Guy Fagherazzi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.