PURPOSE: To determine whether an additional arterial phase (AP) leads to a change in the grade of splenic injury according to the 2018 revision of the AAST Organ Injury Scale, which has incorporated vascular injuries into the grading system and also to study its impact on management. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 527 patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma and had underwent dual-phase CT (AP and portal venous phase (PVP)) from December 2014 to October 2016 (23 months) were included. Two experienced radiologists independently graded the splenic injury according to the revised system in 2 blinded ways (AP + PVP and PVP alone). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for grade of injury on both the phases for all splenic interventions. RESULTS: Splenic injuries were detected in 154 patients, and splenic vascular injuries were detected in 52 of them. Of these, 22 vascular injuries were detected only on the AP, leading to a change in the grade of injury according to the new system in 18 patients. The AUC for ROC curves was generated for the grade of injury on AP + PVP vs. PVP alone for angioembolization (0.80 vs. 0.71, p value 0.002), and all splenic interventions (0.89 vs. 0.83, p value 0.003) showed higher AUC for AP + PVP. CONCLUSION: Addition of AP leads to a significant change in the grading of splenic injuries according to the revised grading system due to increased detection of vascular injuries. Accurate classification of splenic injuries using additional AP would lead to better triage of patients for splenic interventions or conservative management.
PURPOSE: To determine whether an additional arterial phase (AP) leads to a change in the grade of splenic injury according to the 2018 revision of the AAST Organ Injury Scale, which has incorporated vascular injuries into the grading system and also to study its impact on management. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 527 patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma and had underwent dual-phase CT (AP and portal venous phase (PVP)) from December 2014 to October 2016 (23 months) were included. Two experienced radiologists independently graded the splenic injury according to the revised system in 2 blinded ways (AP + PVP and PVP alone). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for grade of injury on both the phases for all splenic interventions. RESULTS:Splenic injuries were detected in 154 patients, and splenic vascular injuries were detected in 52 of them. Of these, 22 vascular injuries were detected only on the AP, leading to a change in the grade of injury according to the new system in 18 patients. The AUC for ROC curves was generated for the grade of injury on AP + PVP vs. PVP alone for angioembolization (0.80 vs. 0.71, p value 0.002), and all splenic interventions (0.89 vs. 0.83, p value 0.003) showed higher AUC for AP + PVP. CONCLUSION: Addition of AP leads to a significant change in the grading of splenic injuries according to the revised grading system due to increased detection of vascular injuries. Accurate classification of splenic injuries using additional AP would lead to better triage of patients for splenic interventions or conservative management.
Entities:
Keywords:
CT angiography; Digital subtraction angiography; Pseudoaneurysm; Spleen; Vascular injury
Authors: L Chastang; T Bège; M Prudhomme; A C Simonnet; A Herrero; F Guillon; D Bono; E Nini; T Buisson; G Carbonnel; L Passebois; C Vacher; M-C Le Moine Journal: J Visc Surg Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.043
Authors: Rosemary A Kozar; Marie Crandall; Kathirkamanthan Shanmuganathan; Ben L Zarzaur; Mike Coburn; Chris Cribari; Krista Kaups; Kevin Schuster; Gail T Tominaga Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Jennifer W Uyeda; Christina A LeBedis; David R Penn; Jorge A Soto; Stephan W Anderson Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alexis R Boscak; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Stuart E Mirvis; Thorsten R Fleiter; Lisa A Miller; Clint W Sliker; Scott D Steenburg; Melvin Alexander Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ben L Zarzaur; Rosemary Kozar; John G Myers; Jeffrey A Claridge; Thomas M Scalea; Todd A Neideen; Adrian A Maung; Louis Alarcon; Alain Corcos; Andrew Kerwin; Raul Coimbra Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Raymond Melikian; Stephanie Goldberg; Brian James Strife; Robert A Halvorsen Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.630