| Literature DB >> 32704347 |
Habtamu Tamrat1, Negesse Mekonnen1, Yeshwas Ferede1, Rudi Cassini2, Negus Belayneh3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A longitudinal prospective study was conducted from October 2017 to April 2018 on calf diarrhea and coccidiosis in dairy farms in Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia with the objectives of determining the incidence of calf diarrhea and calf coccidiosis from diarrheic calves, assessing the major risk factors associated with calf diarrhea and coccidiosis and identifying the existing Eimeria species. A total of 237 calves, 86 calves from 52 smallholder dairy farms and 151 calves from 8 large dairy farms, were used for this study. Fresh fecal samples were collected from 86 diarrheic calves for identification of Eimeria species.Entities:
Keywords: Coccidiosis; Dairy calf; Diarrhea; Ethiopia; Incidence rate; Longitudinal study; Risk factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32704347 PMCID: PMC7374837 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-020-00168-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ir Vet J ISSN: 0368-0762 Impact factor: 2.146
Incidence (true rate and risk rate) of diarrhea and coccidiosis in Bahir Dar dairy farms
| Events | N | Calf- days at risk | Calf-months at risk | Incidence Rate (IR) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| True rate | Risk rate (%)a | ||||
| Diarrhea | 86 | 38,023 | 211 | 0.408 | 33.5 |
| Coccidiosis | 42 | 33,611 | 187 | 0.225 | 20.1 |
aRisk rates estimated from true rates derived by the formula, Risk rate = 1- e-true rate [36]
Explanatory variables significantly associated with the incidence of calf diarrhea based on univariate and multivariate analysis of cox proportional hazards regression model
| Variables | Categories | Univarate Analysis | Multivariate Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRa | 95% CI | HRa | 95% CI | P value | |||
| Age | < 6 months | 0.455 | 0.275–0.754 | .002 | 2.057 | 1.290–3.279 | .002 |
| 6–12 months | |||||||
| Body Condition | Good | 0.253 | 0.151–0.423 | .000 | 1.802 | 1.338–2.426 | .000 |
| Poor | |||||||
| House hygiene | Poor | 1.966 | 1.202–3.215 | .007 | – | – | – |
| Good | |||||||
| House condition | Separated | 0.480 | 0.301–0.764 | .002 | 2.072 | 1.253–3.425 | .004 |
| Unseparated | |||||||
| Parity of dam | Multiparous | 0.643 | 0.416–0.996 | .046 | – | – | – |
| Primiparous | |||||||
| Age at 1stCF | < 6 h | 0.467 | 0.295–0.740 | .001 | 2.107 | 1.304–3.404 | .002 |
| > 6 h | |||||||
| Mother instinct | Good | 0.539 | 0.346–0.841 | .006 | – | – | – |
| Poor | |||||||
aHazard ratio (which has similar meaning to relative risk), Age at 1st CF = age at first colostrum feeding
Explanatory variables significantly associated with the incidence of calf coccidiosis based on univariate and multivariate analysis of cox proportional hazards regression model
| Variables | Categories | Univarate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRa | 95% CI | HRa | 95% CI | ||||
| Age | < 6 months | 13.044 | 4.627–36.770 | .000 | 13.36 | 4.622–38.621 | .000 |
| 6–12 months | |||||||
| Sex | Male | 6.593 | 2.580–16.848 | .000 | 3.500 | 1.213–10.096 | .020 |
| Female | |||||||
| Breed | Cross | 3.591 | 1.101–11.644 | .033 | – | – | – |
| Local | |||||||
| Body Condition | Good | 0.092 | 0.022–0.385 | .001 | – | – | – |
| Poor | |||||||
| House hygiene | Poor | 16.157 | 2.222–117.483 | .006 | – | – | – |
| Good | |||||||
| House condition | Separated | 0.122 | 0.037–0.398 | .000 | – | – | – |
| Unseparated | |||||||
| Parity of dam | Multiparous | 0.371 | 0.202–0.684 | .001 | – | – | – |
| Primiparous | |||||||
aHazard ratio (which has similar meaning to relative risk)
Fig. 1The hazard difference of calf coccidiosis among age group