| Literature DB >> 32704167 |
Hikaru Takeuchi1, Yasuyuki Taki2,3,4, Rui Nouchi5,6,7, Ryoichi Yokoyama8, Yuka Kotozaki9, Seishu Nakagawa10,11, Atsushi Sekiguchi3,12, Kunio Iizuka13, Sugiko Hanawa10, Tsuyoshi Araki14, Carlos Makoto Miyauchi7, Kohei Sakaki7, Takayuki Nozawa15, Shigeyuki Ikeda16, Susum Yokota17, Daniele Magistro18, Yuko Sassa2, Ryuta Kawashima2,7,10.
Abstract
Zinc is a biologically essential element and involved in a wide range of cellular processes. Here, we investigated the associations of zinc levels in hair with brain activity during the n-back working memory task using functional magnetic resonance imaging, fractional anisotropy (FA) of diffusion tensor imaging, and cognitive differences in a study cohort of 924 healthy young adults. Our findings showed that greater hair zinc levels were associated with lower brain activity during working memory in extensive areas in the default mode network (i.e., greater task-induced deactivation) as well as greater FA in white matter areas near the hippocampus and posterior limbs of the internal capsule. These findings advance previous non-neuroimaging findings of zinc's associations with excitability, excitability-associated disorders, and myelination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32704167 PMCID: PMC7378227 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69277-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Statistical results (beta value, t-value, uncorrected p-value, p-value with FDR correction) for the multiple regression analyses using psychological variables and zinc levels after correction for confounding variables.
| Dependent variable | N | Β | Zinc level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPMa | 924 | − 0.032 | − 0.926 | 0.355 | 0.355 |
| Empathizing | 923 | − 0.049 | − 1.480 | 0.139 | 0.192 |
| Systemizing | 923 | − 0.074 | − 2.324 | 0.020 | 0.099 |
| Reverse Stroop interference | 922 | − 0.071 | − 2.090 | 0.037 | 0.099 |
| Stroop interference | 921 | − 0.033 | − 0.975 | 0.330 | 0.355 |
| S-A creativity test | 924 | 0.007 | 0.219 | 0.827 | 0.633* |
| Digit span | 919 | − 0.050 | − 1.461 | 0.144 | 0.192 |
| GHQ30b—sleep disturbance | 921 | − 0.077 | − 2.242 | 0.025 | 0.099 |
| Sleep length | 923 | − 0.057 | − 1.670 | 0.095 | 0.190 |
| External-preoccupation | 923 | − 0.015 | − 0.430 | 0.667 | 0.593* |
| 2-back reaction time | 911 | 0.006 | 0.163 | 0.871 | 0.633* |
FDR false discovery rate.
*Note that some uncorrected p-values are greater than the p-values corrected for FDR. These values are indeed correct. In some FDR methods, including the one used in this study, this phenomenon (corrected statistical values exceed the original p-values) can occur when some p-values among the group of analyzed p-values are very strong for the introduction of this phenomena, see[79].
aRaven’s advanced progressive matrices (a general intelligence task).
bGeneral Health Questionnaire 30.
Demographics of study participants and statistical values of sex differences.
| Measure | Male (N = 563) | Female (N = 361) | Sex differences | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | t value | p value | |
| Age | 563 | 20.83 | 1.93 | 563 | 20.54 | 1.64 | 2.301 | 0.022 |
| RAPM | 563 | 28.77 | 3.89 | 563 | 28.00 | 3.87 | 2.933 | 0.003 |
| Log-Zinc (ppm) | 563 | 5.1401 | 0.0820 | 563 | 5.1900 | 0.1085 | − 7.931 | 6.28*10–15 |
| Empathizing | 562 | 29.89 | 9.70 | 361 | 33.88 | 10.15 | − 5.983 | 3.14*10–9 |
| Systemizing | 562 | 28.28 | 8.57 | 361 | 21.55 | 7.43 | 12.24 | 4.95*10–32 |
| Reverse Stroop interference | 561 | 15.65 | 9.95 | 361 | 14.48 | 9.39 | 1.781 | 0.075 |
| Stroop interference | 560 | 7.15 | 8.92 | 361 | 5.83 | 8.82 | 2.198 | 0.028 |
| S-A creativity test | 563 | 36.97 | 10.69 | 361 | 38.67 | 10.21 | − 2.402 | 0.017 |
| Digit span | 560 | 36.91 | 7.24 | 359 | 34.5 | 6.56 | 5.115 | 3.83–7 |
| GHQ30d—sleep disturbance | 560 | 1.23 | 1.16 | 361 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.779 | 0.061 |
| Sleep lengtha | 562 | 6.88 | 1.11 | 361 | 6.57 | 1.06 | 4.213 | 2.8–5 |
| External-preoccupation | 562 | 27.29 | 5.24 | 361 | 26.67 | 5.56 | 1.714 | 0.087 |
| 2-back reaction time | 555 | 6,609.82 | 1726.68 | 356 | 6,860.69 | 1,820.1 | − 2.092 | 0.037 |
aFor the calculation of sleep length, see our previous study[78].
Figure 1Histograms showing the logarithms of zinc levels in hair for male and female subjects.
Figure 2Positive FA correlates with zinc levels in hair. (a, c) Regions with significant positive correlations between FA and hair zinc levels are overlaid on a “single subject” T1 image from SPM8. Results were obtained using a threshold of threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) of p < 0.05 based on 5,000 permutations. Results were corrected at the whole-brain level. Significant correlations were found in (a) white matter areas close to the left hippocampus and (c) the area of the medial prefrontal cortex. (b, d) Scatter plots of the associations between hair zinc levels and mean FA in the clusters of (a) and (c).
Brain regions exhibiting significant positive correlations between hair zinc level and FA.
| Included large bundles* (number of significant voxels in left and right sides of each anatomical area) | x | y | z | TFCE value | r** | Corrected | Cluster size (mm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corticospinal tract (L:28)/superior cerebellar peduncle (L:1)/Cerebral peduncle (L:451)/posterior limb of internal capsule (L:88)/retrolenticular part of the internal capsule (L:18)/Fornix (cres) (L:33) | − 21 | − 25.5 | − 4.5 | 1549.73 | 0.226 | 0.0002 | 4,488.75 |
| NA | − 15 | 54 | − 12 | 958.62 | 0.174 | 0.0002 | 997.5 |
| Anterior limb of the internal capsule (L:41) | − 9 | 1.5 | − 4.5 | 590.29 | 0.061 | 0.0074 | 495 |
| NA | − 6 | − 9 | − 3 | 422.12 | 0.06 | 0.0394 | 11.25 |
| NA | − 15 | − 18 | 13.5 | 403.5 | 0.067 | 0.048 | 3.75 |
*Anatomical labels and significant clusters of major white matter fibers were determined using the ICBM DTI-81 Atlas (https://www.loni.ucla.edu/).
**Simple correlation coefficients of the relationships between hair zinc level and mean FA of the significant clusters. Note that the correlation coefficients of significant areas in whole-brain multiple regression analyses generally do not reflect true effect sizes due to overfitting effects, which are affected by multiple factors including sample size[80].
Figure 3Brain activity correlates with zinc levels in hair. Regions with significant correlations between the brain activity during the 0-back task and hair zinc levels are overlaid on a “single subject” T1 image from SPM8. Results were obtained using a threshold of threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) of p < 0.05 based on 5,000 permutations. (a) Significant negative correlations were found in the area of the left precentral and postcentral gyrus. (b) Regions of deactivation during the 0-back task obtained from the 63 subjects from which the template of the diffusion image was created[57]. Results are overlaid on a “single subject” T1 image from SPM8. Results were thresholded at p < 0.001, uncorrected for visualization purposes. (c) Scatterplots of the associations between hair zinc levels and mean beta estimates in the clusters of (a).
Brain regions exhibiting significant correlations between hair zinc level and brain activity.
| Included gray matter areasa (number of significant voxels in the left and right sides of each anatomical area) | x | y | z | TFCE value | r | Corrected | Cluster size (mm3) | Activated areas, deactivated areas during the 2-back taskb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postcentral gyrus (L:39)/precentral gyrus (L:5) | − 45 | − 15 | 16 | 488.61 | − 0.119 | 0.0424 | 1,080 | 0%, 97.5% |
| Posterior cingulum (L:18)/hippocampus (L:1)/precuneus (L:1) | − 12 | − 42 | 15 | 549.45 | 0.145 | 0.0236 | 1,215 | 31.11%, 15.56% |
| Posterior cingulum (R:3) | 12 | − 42 | 12 | 452.33 | 0.135 | 0.0472 | 81 | 33.33%, 33.33% |
aLabeling of the anatomical regions of gray matter was based on the WFU PickAtlas Tool (https://www.fmri.wfubmc.edu/cms/software#PickAtlas/)[81,82] and the PickAtlas automated anatomical labeling atlas option[83]. Temporal pole areas and some other areas include all subregions in the areas of this atlas.
bPercentage of voxels activated or deactivated during the 2-back task among the sample of 63 subjects from which the template of the diffusion image was created[57].
Figure 4Brain activity correlates with zinc levels in hair. (a, d, g, j, m) Regions with significant correlations between the brain activity during the 2-back task and hair zinc levels are overlaid on a “single subject” T1 image from SPM8. Results were obtained using a threshold of threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) of p < 0.05 based on 5,000 permutations. Significant positive correlations were observed in (a) the peripheral areas of the bilateral posterior cingulate gyrus and significant negative correlations were found in (d) the mPFC, (g) the left fusiform gyrus, (j) left superior temporal gyrus and contingent regions, and (m) the left middle cingulate gyrus. (b, e, h, k, n) Regions deactivated during the 2-back task obtained from the 63 subjects from which the template of diffusion image was created[57]. Results are overlaid on a “single subject” T1 image from SPM8. Results were obtained using a threshold of threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) of p < 0.05 based on 5,000 permutations. (c, f, i, l, o) Scatterplots of the associations between hair zinc levels and mean beta estimates in the clusters of (a), (d), (g), (j), and (m).
Brain regions exhibiting significant negative correlation between hair zinc level and brain activity during the 2-back task.
| Included gray matter areas (number of significant voxels in the left and right sides of each anatomical area) | x | y | z | TFCE value | r | Corrected | Cluster size (mm3) | Activated areas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior cingulum (L:167, R:110)/middle frontal medial area (L:48, R:49)/superior frontal medial area (L:312, R:133)/superior frontal orbital area (L:3)/superior frontal other areas (L:27, R:1) | − 6 | 60 | 0 | 984.85 | − 0.147 | 0.0022 | 22,950 | 0%, 99.76% |
| Heschl gyrus (L:59)/insula (L:43)/postcentral gyrus (L:83)/precentral gyrus (L:28)/Rolandic operculum (L:105)/supramarginal gyrus (L:2)/middle temporal gyrus (L:26)/superior temporal gyrus (L:224)/ | − 42 | − 30 | 12 | 745.61 | − 0.124 | 0.0074 | 14,958 | 0%, 91.7% |
| Middle cingulum (R:3)/middle frontal other areas (R:5)/inferior parietal lobule (R:17)/superior parietal lobule (R:29)/postcentral gyrus (R:236)/precentral gyrus (R:160) | 33 | − 42 | 57 | 653.39 | − 0.117 | 0.0128 | 12,420 | 3.26%, 83.91% |
| Fusiform gyrus (L:116)/parahippocampal gyrus (L:1)/inferior temporal gyrus (L:6)/cerebellum (L:25) | − 30 | − 42 | − 18 | 617.27 | − 0.147 | 0.018 | 3,753 | 0%, 87.77% |
| Fusiform gyrus (R:125)/hippocampus (R:2)/parahippocampal gyrus (R:16)/cerebellum (R:29) | 27 | − 45 | − 18 | 599.87 | − 0.119 | 0.0202 | 4,347 | 0.62%, 90.06% |
| Middle cingulum (L:43)/supplemental motor area (L:1) | − 12 | − 18 | 42 | 540.53 | − 0.125 | 0.0282 | 1728 | 1.56%, 84.38% |
| Insula (R:21) | 39 | 0 | − 15 | 510.26 | − 0.107 | 0.0328 | 1,188 | 0%, 100% |
| Inferior frontal orbital area (L:7)/middle frontal orbital area (L:6) | − 33 | 39 | − 12 | 477.06 | − 0.108 | 0.0416 | 297 | 0%, 100% |
| Middle cingulum (L:4) | − 12 | 12 | 30 | 467.71 | − 0.134 | 0.0444 | 594 | 18.18%, 4.55% |
| Middle cingulum (R:10) | 12 | − 15 | 45 | 462.49 | − 0.089 | 0.046 | 270 | 0%, 100% |
| Middle temporal gyrus (L:9) | − 54 | 0 | − 21 | 460.45 | − 0.114 | 0.0476 | 33.75 | 0%, 100% |
| Superior frontal other areas (L:2) | − 15 | 39 | 51 | 453.88 | − 0.108 | 0.0496 | 54 | 0%, 100% |
| Inferior temporal gyrus (L:1) | − 48 | − 39 | − 18 | 453.14 | − 0.102 | 0.05 | 27 | 0%, 100% |