Literature DB >> 3270334

In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

G E Taffet1, T A Teasdale, R J Luchi.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of 399 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts in 329 veterans was performed to evaluate the observation that few geriatric patients were discharged alive after they underwent CPR. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts with witnessed arrests were more frequently successful than efforts with unwitnessed arrests (47.7% vs 29.9%) and resulted in live discharge more often than efforts with unwitnessed arrests. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts that resulted in a live discharge were more brief and involved a lower mean number of medication doses. Of the 77 CPR efforts in patients 70 years of age or older who had arrests, 24 (31%) were successful, and in 22 (92%), patients were alive after 24 hours. None lived to discharge. There were 322 CPR efforts in the younger cohort; 137 (43%) were successful, in 124 (91%) of these 137 efforts, patients were alive after 24 hours, and in 22 (16%), patients were discharged alive. Older patients were significantly less likely to live to discharge both at the time of arrest and 24 hours after successful resuscitation. When a multivariate analysis was used, the presence of sepsis, cancer, increased age, increased number of medication doses administered, and absence of witness were all "predictive" of poor outcome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be administered only to those who have the greatest potential benefit from this emotionally and physically traumatic procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Houston; Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3270334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

1.  Do not resuscitate orders: a reappraisal.

Authors:  G Phillips
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Informing the patient about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when the risks outweigh the benefits.

Authors:  A H Moss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center's experience.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Jee-Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang; Noe Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS Study): methods and overall results.

Authors:  H Tunstall-Pedoe; L Bailey; D A Chamberlain; A K Marsden; M E Ward; D A Zideman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

5.  Long-term survival after successful inhospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Authors:  Heather L Bloom; Irfan Shukrullah; Jose R Cuellar; Michael S Lloyd; Samuel C Dudley; A Maziar Zafari
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Medical futility: a paradigm analysis.

Authors:  Nancy S Jecker
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03

Review 7.  Ethical considerations in pharmacotherapy of the aged.

Authors:  M K Goldstein
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  DNR policy and CPR practice in geriatric long-term institutional care.

Authors:  M Gordon; M Cheung
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; R M Walker; D R Kramer; B E Robinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.