| Literature DB >> 32702721 |
Suhaib Muflih, Sawsan Abuhammad, Reema Karasneh, Sayer Al-Azzam, Karem H Alzoubi, Mohammad Muflih.
Abstract
Background : The online teaching demand has increased tremendously to promote the implementation of online teaching-leaning system to meet the need of students during the outbreaks of emerging infectious disease. This study aims to explore whether the pandemic of COVID-19, which requires universities to rapidly offer online learning, will affect attitudes about online education for undergraduate health sciences students. Also, it investigates the barriers for using online tools. Method : A cross-sectional survey using online social media was used to recruit eligible participants. The data for this study were focused on students' experiences utilizing an online education method offered by the Jordanian government universities. This study is utilizing newly developed measuring tools that are expected to enable students to evaluate online teaching in terms of their own learning progress. Results : A total of 1,210 participants agreed to complete the online survey questionnaire. The mean score preparedness and attitude toward online education was average. The majority of students agreed that online courses helped assign reading and homework time better than on-campus approach (75.0%) and felt comfortable to actively communicate with my classmates and instructors online. Zoom and eLearning were the most common online platforms utilized by students. The geographic locations, lack of past experience on using online tools, and lack of past experience on using online tools were identified by students as the main barrier to online educations. Conclusions : Although the pandemic of COVID-19 appeared as uncommon catalyst for promoting eLearning, further research is needed to assess whether learners are ready and willing to make greater use of online education to obtain high quality teaching and learning opportunities, which could totally change educators' and students' attitudes and impression, and subsequently the general themes of online education.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32702721 PMCID: PMC7373140 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-42336/v1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Sq
Frequency Distribution of Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants (n = 1210)
| Variable | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 236 (19.5) |
| Female | 974 (80.5) |
| Age group | |
| 18–19 | 325 (26.9) |
| 20–21 | 504 (41.7) |
| 22–23 | 324 (26.8) |
| Above 23 | 57 (4.7) |
| College Level | |
| Freshmen (first year) | 267 (22.1) |
| Sophomore (second year) | 229 (18.9) |
| Junior (third year) | 306 (25.3) |
| Senior (fourth year) | 150 (12.4) |
| Senior (fifth year) | 211 (17.4) |
| Senior (sixth year) | 47 (3.9) |
| The College Degree | |
| Medicine | 492 (40.7) |
| Bachelor of Pharmacy | 199 (16.4) |
| PharmD | 519 (42.9) |
| Area of living | |
| Urban | 783 (64.7) |
| Rural | 427 (35.3) |
| Prior Experience with Online education | |
| Yes | 456 (37.7) |
| No | 754 (62.3) |
Description of attitude and preparedness of students toward online learning
| Agree | Neutral | Disagree | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Row N % | Count | Row N % | Count | Row N % | |
| You are well-prepared to join online learning | 241 | 19.9% | 321 | 26.5% | 648 | 53.6% |
| Before the emerging of COVID-19, the university used to support online education | 379 | 31.3% | 353 | 29.2% | 478 | 39.5% |
| After the emerging of COVID-19, the university started supporting online education | 755 | 62.4% | 292 | 24.1% | 163 | 13.5% |
| Online education enables students to continue their education similar to the traditional approach | 206 | 17.0% | 322 | 26.6% | 682 | 56.4% |
| With the existence of online education, pandemic does not disrupt my future plans | 232 | 19.2% | 412 | 34.0% | 566 | 46.8% |
| My university delivers a high-quality online education experience | 210 | 17.4% | 179 | 14.8% | 821 | 67.9% |
| I would prefer to have online education to become the new normal | 383 | 31.7% | 267 | 22.1% | 560 | 46.3% |
| I believe that faculty members will overcome the challenges of online learning | 234 | 19.3% | 255 | 21.1% | 721 | 59.6% |
| I am able to easily access the Internet for my studies | 200 | 16.5% | 218 | 18.0% | 792 | 65.5% |
| I feel comfortable taking online courses | 272 | 22.5% | 224 | 18.5% | 714 | 59.0% |
| I feel comfortable to actively communicate with my classmates and instructors online | 808 | 66.8% | 204 | 16.9% | 198 | 16.4% |
| I feel that my background and experience will facilitate my involvement in online studies | 419 | 34.6% | 360 | 29.8% | 431 | 35.6% |
| I feel that taking courses online will help me to remember/master them better. | 211 | 17.4% | 413 | 34.1% | 586 | 48.4% |
| Online courses help me assign reading and homework time better than on-campus approach | 865 | 71.5% | 199 | 16.4% | 146 | 12.1% |
| I am able to complete assignments on time | 258 | 21.3% | 352 | 29.1% | 600 | 49.6% |
| I prefer in-class approach as it provides a lot of interaction with my instructors and students | 242 | 20.0% | 391 | 32.3% | 577 | 47.7% |
| I have satisfactory computer skills for dealing with online course/assignments. | 183 | 15.1% | 216 | 17.9% | 811 | 67.0% |
| I feel more comfortable sharing my thoughts in an online education environment than in-class | 313 | 25.9% | 469 | 38.8% | 428 | 35.4% |
| I can ask my teacher questions and receive a quick response online | 757 | 62.6% | 220 | 18.2% | 233 | 19.3% |
| I prefer face-to-face (in class) contact with my instructor for more efficient learning | 171 | 14.1% | 287 | 23.7% | 752 | 62.1% |
Barriers of online education faced by students
| Agree | Neutral | Disagree | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Row N % | Count | Row N % | Count | Row N % | |
| Limited technology experience | 909 | 75.1% | 185 | 15.3% | 116 | 9.6% |
| Lack of past experience on using online tools | 899 | 74.3% | 208 | 17.2% | 103 | 8.5% |
| Lack of motivation | 694 | 57.4% | 301 | 24.9% | 215 | 17.8% |
| Too challenging eLearning materials | 738 | 61.0% | 268 | 22.1% | 204 | 16.9% |
| Lack of instructions | 822 | 67.9% | 222 | 18.3% | 166 | 13.7% |
| Avoiding commonly used online tools such YouTube, Facebook by instructors | 863 | 71.3% | 220 | 18.2% | 127 | 10.5% |
| Living close to educational institutions | 998 | 82.5% | 148 | 12.2% | 64 | 5.3% |
| Inability to networking with expert in the field | 759 | 62.7% | 245 | 20.2% | 206 | 17.0% |
| Too challenging eLearning tools | 766 | 63.3% | 229 | 18.9% | 215 | 17.8% |
Predictors of attitudes toward online learning
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
| 1 | (Constant) | 26.666 | 2.899 | 9.198 | .000 | |
| Gender | .329 | .451 | .016 | .728 | .467 | |
| Age | .342 | .134 | .083 | 2.548 | .111 | |
| Major | −.031 | .039 | −.019 | −.797 | .425 | |
| Years of the Program | −.557 | .184 | −.102 | −3.019 | .003 | |
| Type of living area | .524 | .362 | .031 | 1.449 | .148 | |
| Do you have a prior experience with online education) | 1.196 | .362 | .073 | 3.307 | .001 | |
| The number of online courses for the current semester | −.001 | .002 | −.011 | −.531 | .595 | |
| The number of hours you spend online for education | 2.186E-012 | .000 | .008 | .390 | .697 | |
| Indicate number of hours online general | .006 | .009 | .014 | .658 | .511 | |
| You are well-prepared to join online learning | 5.569 | .249 | .549 | 22.333 | .000 | |
| Barriers | −.453 | .048 | −.231 | −9.478 | .000 | |
Dependent Variable: SUMAA
| Author Name | Authorship order | Authors’ contributions |
|---|---|---|
| Suhaib M. Muflih, | First | Dr. Muflih served as the principle investigator (PI) and was responsible for the successful administrating and execution of the entire research project. The PI participated in creating the survey questionnaire, data collection, performing statistical analysis, summering the results, drafting, and final approval of the manuscript. |
| Sawsan Abuhammad | Second | Dr. Abuhammad participated in study design, performing statistical analysis, interpretation of data, drafting, critically revising, and final approval of the manuscript |
| Reema Karasneh | Third | Dr. Karasneh participated in study design, interpretation of data, and in drafting, critically revising, and final approval of the manuscript. |
| Sayer Al-Azzam | Fourth | Dr. Al-Azzam participated in the data analysis and interpretation, as well as in drafting, critically revising, and final approval of the manuscript. |
| Karem H. Alzoubi | Fifth | Dr. Alzoubi participated in the study design, creating the survey questionnaire, interpretation of data, also in drafting, critically revising, and final approval of the manuscript. |