Literature DB >> 32700765

Profile and outcome of receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases: a nation-wide multicenter epidemiological study.

Zong-Bi Yi1, Pei Yu2, Su Zhang2, Wen-Na Wang1, Yi-Qun Han1, Qu-Chang Ouyang3, Min Yan4, Xiao-Jia Wang5, Xi-Chun Hu6, Ze-Fei Jiang7, Tao Huang8, Zhong-Sheng Tong9, Shu-Sen Wang10, Yong-Mei Yin11, Hui Li12, Run-Xiang Yang13, Hua-Wei Yang14, Yue-E Teng15, Tao Sun16, Li Cai17, Hong-Yuan Li18, Xi Chen19, Jian-Jun He20, Xin-Lan Liu21, Shun-E Yang22, Jia-Yu Wang1, Jin-Hu Fan2, You-Lin Qiao2, Bing-He Xu1.   

Abstract

Although receptor status including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) of the primary breast tumors was related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients, little information is yet available on whether patient management and survival are impacted by receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases. Using data from the nation-wide multicenter clinical epidemiology study of advanced breast cancer in China (NCT03047889), we report the situation of retesting ER, PR and HER2 status for breast cancer metastases and evaluate the patient management and prognostic value of receptor conversion. In total, 3295 patients were analyzed and 1583 (48.0%) patients retesting receptor status for metastasis. Discordance in one or more receptors between the primary and the metastatic biopsy was found in 37.7% of women. Patients who remained hormone receptor (HR) positive in their metastases had similar progression-free survival of first-line and second-line treatment compared to patients with HR conversion (P > .05). In multivariate analysis, patients who showed ER conversion from negative to positive had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who remained negative in their metastases (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.90; P < .001). Patients with PR remained positive and had longer DFS than patients with PR conversion from negative to positive (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; P = .004). Patients with PR conversion have shorter overall survival than patients with PR remained positive or negative (P = .016 and P = .041, respectively). Our findings showed that the receptors' conversions were common in metastatic breast cancer, and the conversion impacted the survival.
© 2020 Union for International Cancer Control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast neoplasm; metastases; prognostic value; receptor conversion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32700765     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

1.  Radiomic Signatures for Predicting Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Xiao Luo; Hui Xie; Yadi Yang; Cheng Zhang; Yijun Zhang; Yue Li; Qiuxia Yang; Deling Wang; Yingwei Luo; Zhijun Mai; Chuanmiao Xie; Shaohan Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Receptor conversion impacts outcomes of different molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Weipeng Zhao; Linlin Sun; Guolei Dong; Xiaorui Wang; Yan Jia; Zhongsheng Tong
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 Expression Between Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Primary Early Stage Breast Cancer and the Clinical Significance: Retrospective Analysis of 75 Cases.

Authors:  Li Peng; Zhen Zhang; Dachun Zhao; Jialin Zhao; Feng Mao; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  The molecular tumor burden index as a response evaluation criterion in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zongbi Yi; Fei Ma; Guohua Rong; Binliang Liu; Yanfang Guan; Jin Li; Xiaoying Sun; Wenna Wang; Xiuwen Guan; Hongnan Mo; Jiani Wang; Haili Qian; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.