Literature DB >> 32700469

Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterials.

Panagiotis Isigonis1, Antreas Afantitis2, Dalila Antunes3, Alena Bartonova4, Ali Beitollahi5, Nils Bohmer6, Evert Bouman4, Qasim Chaudhry7, Mihaela Roxana Cimpan8, Emil Cimpan9, Shareen Doak10, Damien Dupin11, Doreen Fedrigo12, Valérie Fessard13, Maciej Gromelski14, Arno C Gutleb15, Sabina Halappanavar16, Peter Hoet17, Nina Jeliazkova18, Stéphane Jomini13, Sabine Lindner19, Igor Linkov3,20, Eleonora Marta Longhin4, Iseult Lynch21, Ineke Malsch22, Antonio Marcomini1, Espen Mariussen4, Jesus M de la Fuente23, Georgia Melagraki2, Finbarr Murphy24, Michael Neaves12, Rolf Packroff25, Stefan Pfuhler26, Tomasz Puzyn14,27, Qamar Rahman28, Elise Rundén Pran4, Elena Semenzin1, Tommaso Serchi15, Christoph Steinbach6, Benjamin Trump3,29, Ivana Vinković Vrček30, David Warheit31, Mark R Wiesner32, Egon Willighagen33, Maria Dusinska4.   

Abstract

Nanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano-specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH for nanomaterials (NMs) which came into force in 2020. Thus, an assessment of the components and regulatory boundaries of NMs risk governance is timely, alongside related methods and tools, as part of the global efforts to optimise nanosafety and integrate it into product design processes, via Safe(r)-by-Design (SbD) concepts. This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs. The proposed framework enables continuous integration of the evolving state of the science, leverages best practice from contiguous disciplines and facilitates responsive re-thinking of nanosafety governance to meet future needs. To achieve and operationalise such framework, a science-based Risk Governance Council (RGC) for NMs is being developed. The framework will provide a toolkit for independent NMs' risk governance and integrates needs and views of stakeholders. An extension of this framework to relevant advanced materials and emerging technologies is also envisaged, in view of future foundations of risk research in Europe and globally.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  nanomaterials; nanosafety; regulation; risk governance council; risk governance framework

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32700469     DOI: 10.1002/smll.202003303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  6 in total

1.  Can an InChI for Nano Address the Need for a Simplified Representation of Complex Nanomaterials across Experimental and Nanoinformatics Studies?

Authors:  Iseult Lynch; Antreas Afantitis; Thomas Exner; Martin Himly; Vladimir Lobaskin; Philip Doganis; Dieter Maier; Natasha Sanabria; Anastasios G Papadiamantis; Anna Rybinska-Fryca; Maciej Gromelski; Tomasz Puzyn; Egon Willighagen; Blair D Johnston; Mary Gulumian; Marianne Matzke; Amaia Green Etxabe; Nathan Bossa; Angela Serra; Irene Liampa; Stacey Harper; Kaido Tämm; Alexander CØ Jensen; Pekka Kohonen; Luke Slater; Andreas Tsoumanis; Dario Greco; David A Winkler; Haralambos Sarimveis; Georgia Melagraki
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Carbon Nanotubes: Probabilistic Approach for Occupational Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Carolina Zellino; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico M Cavallo
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 3.  Analyzing the surface of functional nanomaterials-how to quantify the total and derivatizable number of functional groups and ligands.

Authors:  Daniel Geißler; Nithiya Nirmalananthan-Budau; Lena Scholtz; Isabella Tavernaro; Ute Resch-Genger
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  The risk perception of nanotechnology: evidence from twitter.

Authors:  Finbarr Murphy; Ainaz Alavi; Martin Mullins; Irini Furxhi; Arash Kia; Myles Kingston
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Local Scale Exposure and Fate of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Mikko Poikkimäki; Joris T K Quik; Arto Säämänen; Miikka Dal Maso
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 6.  (Re)Conceptualizing decision-making tools in a risk governance framework for emerging technologies-the case of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Martin Mullins; Martin Himly; Isabel Rodríguez Llopis; Irini Furxhi; Sabine Hofer; Norbert Hofstätter; Peter Wick; Daina Romeo; Dana Küehnel; Kirsi Siivola; Julia Catalán; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Ioannis Xiarchos; Shona Linehan; Daan Schuurbiers; Amaia García Bilbao; Leire Barruetabeña; Damjana Drobne
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2022-07-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.