Literature DB >> 32699932

ASO Author Reflection: Learning Curves in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy-Not Only the Surgeon Counts.

Philip Zeuschner1, Matthias Saar2, Martin Janssen2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699932      PMCID: PMC7677156          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08866-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


× No keyword cloud information.

Past

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has rapidly evolved into a standard technique in high-volume centers. To improve surgical outcomes, especially the learning curve of the robotic surgeon has extensively been analyzed so far.1 Furthermore, the annual caseload has been linked with better outcomes, referring to the learning curve of a department.2 However, data about the role of the bedside assistant is scarce and inconclusive.3 For this reason, we performed a comparative analysis to assess the impact of the learning curve of the department, surgeon, and bedside assistant, as well as of patient-related factors on perioperative outcomes of RAPN.4

Present

Our first 500 transperitoneal RAPN were retrospectively analyzed. The experience “EXP” was defined as the current number of RAPNs conducted by either (1) the department, (2) the surgeon, or (3) the assistant. In multiple regression analysis, not only EXP of the surgeon and EXP of the department, but also EXP of the bedside assistant had a significant impact on perioperative outcomes. Higher EXP of the assistant was linked to shorter operating times, lower conversion, and higher success rates (defined as MIC: positive surgical margin, warm ischemia time, complications). Consequently, the impact of the bed-side assistant in RAPN has clearly been underestimated so far. Tumor complexity (PADUA score) impacted most perioperative outcome parameters and was thereby the most important patient-related factor. Perioperative outcomes significantly improved with EXP > 100 for the department, EXP > 35 for the surgeon, and EXP > 15 for the assistant.

Future

Although the fundamental need for bedside assistants in robotic surgery has been questioned recently, the complexity of robotic partial nephrectomy renders all participants of RAPN highly important. Training strategies in robotic surgery should not only focus on the surgeon but also on the department and bed-side assistants, which is currently clearly underdeveloped for RAPN.
  4 in total

1.  The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter?

Authors:  Aaron M Potretzke; Brent A Knight; John A Brockman; Joel Vetter; Robert S Figenshau; Sam B Bhayani; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-02

2.  Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours.

Authors:  Alexandre Mottrie; Geert De Naeyer; Peter Schatteman; Paul Carpentier; Mattia Sangalli; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  What is the hospital volume threshold to optimize inpatient complication rate after partial nephrectomy?

Authors:  Sohrab Arora; Jacob Keeley; Daniel Pucheril; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Three Different Learning Curves Have an Independent Impact on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Philip Zeuschner; Irmengard Meyer; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Matthias Saar; Martin Janssen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.