| Literature DB >> 32699840 |
Min Zi1, Nicholas Stafford1, Sukhpal Prehar1, Florence Baudoin1, Delvac Oceandy1, Xin Wang1, Thuy Bui1, Mohamed Shaheen1, Ludwig Neyses1, Elizabeth J Cartwright1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mouse model of transverse aortic constriction (TAC) has been widely used as a cardiac stress in the investigation of the molecular mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy. Recently, the International Knockout Mouse Consortium has selected the C57BL/6NTac (BL/6N) mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes; however, a range of genetic and cardiac phenotypic differences have been reported between this substrain and the commonly used C57BL/6J (BL/6J) substrain. It has been reported by Garcia-Menendez and colleagues that 12-week C57BL/6NTac mice are susceptible to heart failure but little is known about the cardiac remodeling in this substrain as cardiac function progresses from compensation to decompensation.Entities:
Keywords: C57BL/6; Cardiac hypertrophy; Heart failure; Transverse aortic constriction (TAC)
Year: 2019 PMID: 32699840 PMCID: PMC7357793 DOI: 10.1016/j.crphys.2019.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Physiol ISSN: 2665-9441
Fig. 1Echocardiography analysis in different age groups after 2-week TAC and sham surgery. (A) Example echocardiography of left ventricle. (B) Left ventricular relative wall thickness (RWT). (C) Left ventricular end-diastolic internal dimension (LVEDD). (D) Left ventricular end-systolic internal dimension (LVESD). (E) Left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). (F) In C57BL/6N TAC mice, FS decreased in an age dependent manner (R2 = 0.430, p = 0.003). Data are shown as means ± SE (n = 8 for sham and n = 6–14 per group for TAC). *P < 0.05 compared with the sham group of same strain, showing significant increase; §P < 0.05 compared with the sham group of same strain, showing significant decrease; #P < 0.05 compared with C57BL/6J mice of the same age group.
Fig. 3Variability in hypertrophic response and cardiac phenotypes. (A) Variability in heart weight to tibia length ratio in response to the duration of TAC. (B) Variability in cardiac phenotype in response to the duration of TAC. (C) Variability in heart weight to tibia length ratio in response to the age. (D) Variability in cardiac phenotype in response to the age. n = 5–12 per group. TAC, transverse aortic constriction.
Heart failure rate in different age groups of mice after 2-week TAC.
| Age (week) | C57BL/6J | C57BL/6N | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 20% (2/10) | 25% (3/12) | 1.000 |
| 10 | 17% (1/6) | 50% (3/6) | 0.546 |
| 12 | 20% (1/5) | 100% (5/5) | 0.048 |
| P value | 1.000 | 0.018 |
Heart failure with reduced systolic function was defined as having dyspnea, body weight loss (approximately 10% decrease), increased wet lung weight and reduced fractional shortening on echocardiography compared with sham controls.
Fig. 2Morphology and echocardiography analysis in 8 weeks old mice after TAC and sham surgery. (A) Example echocardiography of left ventricle. (B) Heart weight to tibia length ratio. (C) Left ventricular relative wall thickness (RWT). (D) Left ventricular end-diastolic internal dimension (LVEDD). (E) Left ventricular end-systolic internal dimension (LVESD). (F) Left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). (G) In C57BL/6N TAC mice, FS decreased in time-dependent manner (R2 = 0.661, p < 0.0001). (H) Lung weight to body weight ratio. Data are shown as means ± SE (n = 8 for sham and n = 5–14 per group for TAC). *P < 0.05 compared with the sham group of same strain, showing significant increase; §P < 0.05 compared with the sham group of same strain, showing significant decrease; #P < 0.05 compared with C57BL/6J mice at the same time point of TAC.
Heart failure rate in mice aged 8 weeks after 2-week and 5-week TAC.
| TAC duration (week) | C57BL/6J | C57BL/6N | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 20% (2/10) | 25% (3/12) | 1.000 |
| 5 | 25% (2/8) | 100% (5/5) | 0.021 |
| P value | 1.000 | 0.009 |
Heart failure with reduced systolic function was defined as having dyspnea, body weight loss (approximately 10% decrease), increased wet lung weight and reduced fractional shortening on echocardiography compared with sham controls.
Fig. 4Variability in pre-TAC aortic arch dimension and its relationship with the severity of hypertrophy. (A) There is an age-independent variability in pre-TAC aortic arch dimension in C57BL/6J mice but not in C57BL/6NTac mice (n = 17–21 per group). (B) There is a positive correlation between the pre-TAC aortic arch dimension and HW/TL ratio in C57BL/6J mice (R2 = 0.419, p = 0.049) but not in C57BL/6NTac mice (n = 5–12 per group). TAC, transverse aortic constriction; HW/TL ratio, heart weight/tibia length ratio.
Fig. 5Innate difference in cardiac remodelling after 2-week TAC. (A) The percentage of the fibrosis area and representative images of Masson's trichrome staining in cardiac cross sections (magnification, ×20; bar = 100 μm) (n = 5–8 per group). (B) BNP mRNA expression (n = 5–8 per group). (C) Col 1α1 mRNA expression (n = 5–8 per group). (D) Col 3α1 mRNA expression (n = 5–8 per group). (E) AT2R mRNA expression (n = 3–8 per group). *p < 0.05 compared with the sham group of same strain. #p < 0.05 compared with C57BL/6J mice at the same time point.
Conscious electrocardiography before and after 2-week TAC in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice.
| C57BL/6J | C57BL/6N | P (BL/6J vs. BL/6N TAC) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 2-week TAC | P | Sham | 2-week TAC | P | ||
| N number | 11 | 6 | 7 | 9 | |||
| Heart rate, bpm | 748 ± 12 | 759 ± 8 | NS | 735 ± 15 | 764 ± 12 | NS | NS |
| RR interval, ms | 80.3 ± 1.3 | 79.1 ± 0.8 | NS | 81.6 ± 1.7 | 78.7 ± 1.2 | NS | NS |
| PR interval, ms | 32.3 ± 0.7 | 33.0 ± 0.7 | NS | 31.5 ± 0.9 | 31.3 ± 1.2 | NS | NS |
| P duration, ms | 7.77 ± 0.60 | 8.95 ± 0.63 | NS | 6.45 ± 0.31 | 9.26 ± 0.33 | 0.000 | NS |
| QRS interval, ms | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 16.0 ± 0.5 | 0.000 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 19.4 ± 1.3 | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| QT interval, ms | 22.9 ± 2.0 | 30.4 ± 0.7 | 0.006 | 24.8 ± 0.7 | 34.6 ± 1.8 | 0.000 | 0.045 |
| QTc, ms | 81.2 ± 7.2 | 108.0 ± 2.9 | 0.003 | 85.1 ± 2.2 | 124.3 ± 6.4 | 0.000 | 0.036 |
| JT interval, ms | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 14.4 ± 0.5 | NS | 12.7 ± 0.5 | 15.5 ± 0.9 | 0.038 | NS |
Measurements are represented as mean ± SE and compared with 2-tailed Student's t-test. TAC, transverse aortic constriction; NS, not significant.