Literature DB >> 32699488

The Sensitivity of Land-Atmosphere Coupling to Modern Agriculture in the Northern Midlatitudes.

Sonali Shukla MCDermid1,2, Carlo Montes2, Benjamin I Cook2,3, Michael J Puma2,3,4, Nancy Y Kiang2, Igor Aleinov3,2.   

Abstract

Modern agricultural land cover and management are important as regional climate forcings. Previous work has shown that land cover change can significantly impact key climate variables, including turbulent fluxes, precipitation, and surface temperature. However, fewer studies have investigated how intensive crop management can impact background climate conditions, such as the strength of land-atmosphere coupling and evaporative regime. We conduct sensitivity experiments using a state-of-the-art climate model with modified vegetation characteristics to represent modern crop cover and management, using observed crop-specific leaf area indexes and calendars. We quantify changes in land-atmosphere interactions and climate over intensively cultivated regions situated at transitions between moisture- and energy-limited conditions. Results show that modern intensive agriculture has significant and geographically varying impacts on regional evaporative regimes and background climate conditions. Over the northern Great Plains, modern crop intensity increases the model simulated precipitation and soil moisture, weakening hydrologic coupling by increasing surface water availability and reducing moisture limits on evapotranspiration. In the U.S. Midwest, higher growing season evapotranspiration, coupled with winter and spring rainfall declines, reduces regional soil moisture, while crop albedo changes also reduce net surface radiation. This results overall in reduced dependency of regional surface temperature on latent heat fluxes. In central Asia, a combination of reduced net surface energy and enhanced pre-growing season precipitation amplify the energy-limited evaporative regime. These results highlight the need for improved representations of agriculture in global climate models to better account for regional climate impacts and interactions with other anthropogenic forcings.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 32699488      PMCID: PMC7375324          DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0799.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clim        ISSN: 0894-8755            Impact factor:   5.148


  11 in total

1.  Solutions for a cultivated planet.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Navin Ramankutty; Kate A Brauman; Emily S Cassidy; James S Gerber; Matt Johnston; Nathaniel D Mueller; Christine O'Connell; Deepak K Ray; Paul C West; Christian Balzer; Elena M Bennett; Stephen R Carpenter; Jason Hill; Chad Monfreda; Stephen Polasky; Johan Rockström; John Sheehan; Stefan Siebert; David Tilman; David P M Zaks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe.

Authors:  Sonia I Seneviratne; Daniel Lüthi; Michael Litschi; Christoph Schär
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation.

Authors:  Roger Pielke; Gwyn Prins; Steve Rayner; Daniel Sarewitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Empirical evidence for a recent slowdown in irrigation-induced cooling.

Authors:  Céline Bonfils; David Lobell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States.

Authors:  Matei Georgescu; David B Lobell; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Representing agriculture in Earth System Models: approaches and priorities for development.

Authors:  S S McDermid; L O Mearns; A C Ruane
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 6.660

7.  Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Mueller; James S Gerber; Matt Johnston; Deepak K Ray; Navin Ramankutty; Jonathan A Foley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Direct human influence on atmospheric CO2 seasonality from increased cropland productivity.

Authors:  Josh M Gray; Steve Frolking; Eric A Kort; Deepak K Ray; Christopher J Kucharik; Navin Ramankutty; Mark A Friedl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; James S Gerber; Graham K MacDonald; Paul C West
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; Nathaniel D Mueller; Paul C West; Jonathan A Foley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.