| Literature DB >> 32699184 |
Wei Xu1, Bing-Jie Su1, Xue-Ning Shen2, Yan-Lin Bi3, Chen-Chen Tan1, Jie-Qiong Li4, Xi-Peng Cao5, Qiang Dong2, Lan Tan1, Jin-Tai Yu2.
Abstract
It was unclear whether sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was a circulating biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We tested the cross-sectional relationships between plasma SHBG and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers in 707 non-demented adults. Next, the influences of plasma SHBG on dynamic changes of CSF Aβ42, hippocampus volume, brain metabolism, and cognition were explored in 448 non-demented adults from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Finally, the predictive and diagnostic values of plasma SHBG in AD were explored. A positive correlation was found between SHBG levels in plasma and CSF. Individuals with higher plasma SHBG levels had lower CSF Aβ42 (p < 0.005), after adjusting for age, gender, education, APOE4 allele, and cognitive scores. Though no significant difference of plasma SHBG was observed between mild AD dementia and healthy normal, plasma SHBG could contribute to accelerated rates of CSF Aβ42 decrease (p < 0.0005), decline in brain metabolism (p < 0.05), and hippocampus atrophy (p < 0.01), cognitive decline (p < 0.01), as well as higher risk of AD dementia (p < 0.05). These findings indicated plasma SHBG could be a prodromal biomarker to predict disease progression in AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; biomarker; cerebrospinal fluid; plasma; sex hormone-binding globulin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32699184 PMCID: PMC7425468 DOI: 10.18632/aging.103497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Baseline characteristics of participants.
| N. | 707 | 353 | 354 | … | 448 | 224 | 224 | … |
| Age (mean ± SD, year) | 62.5 ± 10.5 | 61.1 ± 10.4 | 64.0 ± 10.4 | 74.8 ± 7.2 | 74.1 ± 7.2 | 75.6 ± 7.2 | ||
| Gender (M/F) | 291/416 | 133/220 | 158/196 | 0.06 | 282/166 | 168/56 | 114/110 | |
| Education (mean ± SD, year) | 9.7 ± 5.5 | 9.9 ± 4.4 | 9.6 ± 6.4 | 0.10 | 15.6 ± 3.0 | 15.6 ± 3.1 | 15.7 ± 2.9 | 0.93 |
| 16.5% (117) | 15.9% (56) | 17.2% (61) | 0.62 | 47.5% (213) | 48.2% (108) | 46.9% (105) | 0.78 | |
| MMSE (mean ± SD) | 27.1 ± 3.2 | 27.3 ± 3.2 | 27.0 ± 3.1 | 27.3 ± 1.8 | 27.4 ± 1.8 | 27.1 ± 1.8 | 0.11 | |
| SHBG (mean ± SD, nmol/L) | 52.9 ± 31.3 | 29.8 ± 10.2 | 75.9 ± 28.1 | 61.7 ± 27.2 | 41.2 ± 10.2 | 82.3 ± 23.0 | ||
MMSE: mini-mental state examination; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin; M: male; F: female
*cutoff is defined as median level of plasma SHBG: > 46.74 nmol/L for CABLE and > 56.23 nmol/L for ADNI
Figure 1Relationships of plasma SHBG with CSF SHBG and CSF Aβ42. Plasma and CSF levels of SHBG were highly correlated (A). Higher levels of plasma SHBG were associated with lower levels of CSF Aβ42 after adjusting for age, gender, education, APOE4 status, and MMSE at baseline (B); Higher levels of plasma SHBG were associated with faster decline of CSF Aβ42 after adjusting for age, gender, education, APOE4 status, and diagnosis at baseline (C).
Figure 2Relationships of plasma SHBG with hippocampus atrophy, brain metabolism decline, and cognitive decline. Individuals with higher SHBG showed faster rate of hippocampus atrophy (A) and brain metabolism decline (B). Individuals with higher plasma SHBG levels exhibited faster decline in general cognition (C and D), memory function (E), and executive function (F). All models were adjusted for age, sex, education, APOE4 status, and baseline diagnosis. Abbreviations: ADAS = Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale; MEM = Memory function; EF = Executive function. The first p value with index ® indicates the relationships between baseline plasma SHBG and change rates of the above phenotypes over follow-up. The second p value represents association results from the linear mixed effects models.
Figure 3Association between plasma SHBG and AD risk. Subjects with higher plasma SHBG had an increased risk of developing AD, independent of age, sex, education, APOE genotype, and diagnosis.
Hazard ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of the association of SHBG levels with risk of Alzheimer’s disease according to strata of age, sex, and BMI.
| Total (n = 237) | T1 (reference) | 50/89 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 55/77 | |||||||
| T3 | 57/71 | 1.48 (0.99-2.23) | 0.06 | |||||
| Male (n = 157) | T1 (reference) | 36/70 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 40/56 | |||||||
| T3 | 25/31 | |||||||
| Female (n = 80) | T1 (reference) | 14/19 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 15/21 | 1.04 (0.50-2.26) | 0.92 | 1.28 (0.59-2.79) | 0.54 | 0.83 (0.31-2.22) | 0.72 | |
| T3 | 32/40 | 1.18 (0.63-2.22) | 0.60 | 1.19 (0.62-2.31) | 0.60 | 1.86 (0.83-4.17) | 0.13 | |
| Age < 75y (n = 127) | T1 (reference) | 31/52 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 24/37 | 1.09 (0.64-1.86) | 0.75 | 1.09 (0.63-1.88) | 0.76 | 0.95 (0.52-1.74) | 0.87 | |
| T3 | 28/38 | 1.48 (0.89-2.47) | 0.13 | 1.48 (0.81-2.68) | 0.20 | 2.03 (0.91-4.52) | 0.08 | |
| Age ≥ 75y (n = 110) | T1 (reference) | 19/37 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 31/40 | |||||||
| T3 | 29/33 | 1.88 (0.94-3.78) | 0.07 | |||||
| BMI < 26 kg/m2 (n = 122) | T1 (reference) | 24/38 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 26/36 | 1.27 (0.73-2.21) | 0.40 | 1.52 (0.84-2.75) | 0.17 | 1.58 (0.81-3.06) | 0.18 | |
| T3 | 41/48 | 1.75 (0.96-3.17) | 0.07 | 1.87 (0.99-3.56) | 0.06 | |||
| BMI ≥ 26 kg/m2 (n = 115) | T1 (reference) | 26/51 | 1 | … | 1 | … | 1 | … |
| T2 | 29/41 | 1.84 (0.96-3.53) | 0.07 | |||||
| T3 | 16/23 | 1.71 (0.92-3.19) | 0.09 | 1.52 (0.77-3.02) | 0.23 | 2.08 (0.79-5.44) | 0.14 | |
*SHBG levels (nmol/L) were log10-transformed: T1 <1.67; T2 = 1.67-1.84; T3>1.84
amodel 1 – crude HR with no covariates adjusted
bmodel2 – HR adjusted for age, gender, education, APOE4 status, and diagnosis at baseline.
cmodel 3 –HR adjusted for model 1 + diabetes mellitus type 2, depression, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep disorder, stroke history, cardiovascular disease, alcohol abuse, hearing loss, current smoking, and cancer.
Abbreviations: HR: hazard ratios; CI: confidence intervals; BMI: body mass index.