| Literature DB >> 32699121 |
Savannah E Sanchez1,2, Anders Omsland3.
Abstract
Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Query (Q)Entities:
Keywords: Coxiella burnetiizzm321990; axenic; bacteriology; iron; physiology; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32699121 PMCID: PMC7376505 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00458-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1Replication and viability of C. burnetii are dynamically responsive to iron availability. C. burnetii iron utilization was tested in ACCM-2. Media supplemented with various concentrations of FeSO4 were monitored every 2 days for 8 days to determine C. burnetii replication by measuring absorbance (a) and viability by CFU enumeration (b). Control conditions for ACCM-2 include FeSO4 at a final concentration of 10 μM. Data points reflect the average of 3 independent experiments; error bars indicate SEM. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was determined by comparison to control conditions for replication and by comparing starting versus final CFUs for viability (unpaired Student’s t test).
FIG 2C. burnetii has a reduced ability to utilize iron complexed with citrate. To evaluate the ability of C. burnetii to acquire and utilize iron-citrate, the alternative axenic medium APCM was supplemented with various concentrations of citric acid (a) and C. burnetii growth was determined by measuring absorbance after 4 days. To determine whether the inhibitory effect of citric acid could be rescued by iron supplementation, APCM cultures containing 7 mM citric acid were supplemented with additional FeSO4 and C. burnetii final yields were measured via absorbance (b). Each bar represents the average from 2 independent experiments; error bars indicate SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test versus control conditions). To confirm the presence of iron-citrate complexes under the conditions tested, the UV-visible spectra for solutions of citric acid, iron chloride, or a mixture of iron chloride and citric acid (c) were compared to spectra obtained using APCM and ACCM-2 basal buffers (d). With the exception of APCM, plotted spectra represent the average from 5 independent scans. Data from a representative experiment are shown.
FIG 3C. burnetii has a poor capacity to replicate in citrate-based medium without iron supplementation. To assess whether iron-dependent growth in ACCM-2 was specific to C. burnetii, cultures of E. coli (Ec), Y. pestis (Yp), and P. aeruginosa (Pa) were compared to that of C. burnetii (Cb) after incubation in ACCM-2 or ACCM-2−FeSO4 (a). Final culture turbidities were quantified via absorbance and presented as percentage of the control (i.e., ACCM-2 final yields). Each bar represents the average from 3 independent experiments, and error bars indicate SEM. ***, P < 0.0001 (unpaired Student’s t test versus control conditions). The significance of iron compared to other nutritional or physicochemical conditions established as critical for optimal C. burnetii growth was determined by enumerating CFUs for the initial 3 days of culture where a single component or parameter was missing and/or altered (b). Each point represents the average from 3 independent experiments, and error bars indicate SEM. **, P < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test of starting versus final CFU).
FIG 4C. burnetii protein and ATP synthesis are permissive to suboptimal iron availability. The requirement for iron to initiate and/or sustain C. burnetii replication and metabolism was assessed by performing downshift (D.S.) experiments where at 24, 48, and 72 h, C. burnetii cultures grown under optimal iron conditions were subcultured into ACCM-2−FeSO4, and final yields were measured by absorbance after 8 days of incubation (a), and by quantifying levels of protein synthesis in C. burnetii cultures containing suboptimal concentrations of iron or supplemented with Bpdl (b). The negative control for protein synthesis (Control -) was ACCM-2, pH 7.0. To correlate energy requirements of replication and protein synthesis with iron availability, bacterial ATP pools were measured following incubation with suboptimal levels of iron or supplementation of Bpdl to the medium (c). All conditions were compared to ACCM-2 (Control +). Bars represent the average from 3 to 5 independent experiments. Error bars indicate SEM. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s posttest applied only to panels a and b; unpaired Student’s t test used for starting versus final OD in panel a).
FIG 5Transferrin, ferritin, and hemoglobin stimulate C. burnetii replication. To assess whether C. burnetii can utilize iron from host-associated iron-containing proteins, bacterial yields were determined via enumeration of GE after 8 days in ACCM-2−FeSO4 supplemented with different concentrations of transferrin, ferritin, or hemoglobin (a). Each bar represents the average from 3 independent experiments; error bars indicate SEM. To determine whether the moderately acidic pH of the CCV aids iron release from iron-binding proteins, iron content was measured for 0.5 mg ml−1 of transferrin (b), ferritin (c), or hemoglobin (d) exposed to pH 7.3 or 4.75 for 2 h. Each bar represents the average from 3 independent experiments; error bars indicate SEM. n.s., not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test).
FIG 6Modulation of host intracellular iron content directly influences C. burnetii intracellular replication. The influence of host iron pools on C. burnetii intracellular replication was assessed by exposing infected Vero cells for 3 days to different concentrations of Bpdl at onset of infection and measuring C. burnetii load via GE (a). Each bar represents the average of 2 to 6 independent experiments; error bars indicate SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s posttest). C. burnetii intracellular viability was determined via CFU enumeration from Vero cells exposed to Bpdl for 3 days following addition on day 3 (d3) postinfection (b). Data points indicate biological replicates with the mean and SEM represented. n.s., not significant; *, P < 0.05 (paired Student’s t test).
FIG 7Working model for the role of iron in C. burnetii replication and viability. C. burnetii acquires molecular iron through acid degradation of iron-binding proteins (e.g., transferrin [Tf] and ferritin [Ft]) after uptake into the acidic CCV. Ferric iron released from iron-containing proteins is likely reduced within the CCV via the host enzyme STEAP3, delivered to the CCV upon fusion with endosomes. Transportation of Fe3+ into the periplasm of Coxiella would require conversion of Fe3+ to Fe2+ via a Coxiella-specific ferric reductase in order for C. burnetii to transport Fe2+ via FeoAB to the cytosol for replication and viability. Alternatively, Fe3+ reduced via STEAP3 to Fe2+ can be (i) shuttled outside the CCV via the DMT1 transporter and maintained in the host labile iron pool (HostLIP), (ii) remain within the CCV in a similar labile iron pool (CCVLIP), or (iii) be actively transported into the Coxiella periplasm by a putative Fe2+/metal transporter. Once in the periplasmic space, Fe2+ can be directly acquired via FeoAB for use in bacterial replication and viability or reside within a putative bacterial labile iron pool (BLIP).