| Literature DB >> 32698881 |
Stephanos Finitsis1, Valerie Bernier2, Isabelle Buccheit2, Olivier Klein3, Serge Bracard4, Francois Zhu4, Guillaume Gauchotte5, René Anxionnat4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic encapsulated intracerebral hematomas (CEIHs) are a rare, late complication of radiosurgery for intracranial AVM. We present 5 cases treated mostly by surgical excision and review the literature.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32698881 PMCID: PMC7374821 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01616-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1Case 1. A 27-year-old woman presented with hemorrhage due to a left temporal AVM. After partial treatment with embolization, 18 Grays were delivered to the margin of the lesion with a collimator of 20 mm. Twelve years post SRS the patient complained of chronic headache. a Axial Flair and (b) axial T1 contrast enhanced images showed a large heterogeneous well delineated cavernoma-like lesion. Surgery was initially recused because of the deep location and the mild symptoms of the patient. b Axial Flair, c axial T2* MRI images 2 years later showed lesion growth which was surgically removed. d Histology revealed an angiomatous pseudo-cavernous lesion containing dilated vascular lumen, fibrino-hemorraghic changes and fibrosis (hematoxylin, eosin and saffron, × 100)
Fig. 2Case 4. A 21-year-old man presented with seizures related to a left temporal AVM. The lesion was partially treated with embolization. A nidal remnant was further treated with 18 Grays delivered at the periphery of a target volume of 5,3 ml. Two years post SRS an MRI showed mild radiation induced changes. Ten years post SRS, the patient presented with headache and paresthesia. a axial Flair at the time of SRS. Axial Flair (b) and (c) SWI 11 years later show a large cystic lesion with chronic hemorrhage and an enhancing nodular part with surrounding edema. The cyst was evacuated, and the walls partially removed. Histology showed (d) a well-circumscribed vascular lesion with extensive fibrosis (hematoxylin, eosin and saffron, × 40) and (e) post radiation hyalinization of small vessels (hematoxylin, eosin and saffron, × 400)
Fig. 3Case 5. A 49-year-old man presented with intracranial hemorrhage related to a right occipital AVM. The lesion was partially treated with embolization. A nidal remnant was further treated with SRS with a marginal dose of 18 Grays. Thirteen years post SRS, the patient presented hemiparesis. a Flair, (b) T2*, (c) T1 and d) T1 contrast enhanced MR images show a large heterogeneous cavernoma-like lesion with extensive edema. Surgery was judged as too risky and the lesion finally stabilized under steroid therapy
Reported cases of CEIHs
| Author | Age (years) | Sex | Initial Bleeding | Locat-ion | Embo-lization | Radio- | Marginal Dose (Gy)a | RIC/ | Cyst | Years post SRS | Symptoms | MR Imaging | AVM Complete Obliteration | Treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | M | + | IC | – | GKS | 20 | RN | – | 2 | HH, N/V | ns | – | Hematoma evacuation, Excision | Improvement | |
| 51 | M | – | BG | – | GKS | 22,5 | – | – | 6 | HH | Hypo L | – | Excision | Improvement | |
| 47 | M | – | BG | – | Linac | 25 | – | + | 7,5 | HH | HR, Het L, Nod E | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 10 | M | ns | L | – | GKS twice | ns | – | – | 5 | HH, HP | Het L | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 15 | F | + | BG | – | Linac | ns | – | + | 7 | HP | HR, Het L | + | Ommaya Reservoir | Improvement | |
| 57 | M | – | BG | – | GKS | 22,5 | – | + | 5 | AS | ns | – | Excision | Stable | |
| 55 | M | – | L | – | Linac | 20 | – | – | 11 | HP | HR, Hypo L | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 15 | F | + | BG | + | GKS | 18 | RIC | – | 3 | HH, HP, Vis | HR, Hypo L | – | Steroids, Excision | Improvement | |
| 10 | M | + | L | – | GKS twice | 18a | – | – | 5 | HP, Vis | HR, Het L, Multi Nod E | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 49 | M | – | BG | + | Linac | 18 | RN | + | 4 | SD, Memory | Nod E | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 34 | F | + | C | – | GKS twice | 22a | RIC | + | 13 | HH, N/V, FP | HR, Hypo L, Nod E | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 30 | F | – | L | – | GKS twice | 28a | RIC | – | 7 | HP | Nod E | + | Steroids, Excision | Improvement | |
| 36 | F | – | L | – | GKS twice | 30a | RIC | – | 7 | HP | HR, Het L | + | Steroids, Excision | Improvement | |
| 16 | M | – | L | + | GKS | 25 | RIC | – | 3 | HH | HR, Het L | + | Steroids, Excision | Improvement | |
| 15 | F | – | L | – | GKS three times | 15a | RIC | – | 2 | HP | ns | + | Steroids, Excision | Improvement | |
| 38 | M | + | BG | – | GKS | 25 | – | + | 12 | HP | ns | + | Steroids, Partial Excision | Worse | |
| 23 | M | + | L | – | GKS | 18 | – | + | 8,1 | S | ns | + | FU, Excision | Improvement | |
| 19 | F | + | L | + | GKS | 18 | – | – | 11,2 | HH | Nod E | + | FU, Excision | Improvement | |
| 33 | M | – | L | + | GKS | 18 | – | + | 4,5 | HP, E | HR, Het L | + | FU, Excision | Improvement | |
| 19 | F | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 28 | – | + | 10,3 | ns | ns | – | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 31 | M | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 25 | – | + | 5 | ns | ns | + | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 24 | M | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 20 | – | + | 1,1 | ns | ns | – | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 56 | F | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 20 | – | + | 12 | ns | ns | + | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 36 | F | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 18 | – | + | 7,9 | ns | ns | + | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 35 | M | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 18 | – | + | 7,1 | ns | ns | + | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 46 | F | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 20 | – | + | 6,2 | ns | ns | + | FU, Excision | ns | |
| 50 | F | ns | ns | ns | GKS | 20 | – | + | 10,1 | ns | ns | + | Lost FU | Lost FU | |
| 47 | M | + | L | – | GKS | 25 | – | + | 6,2 | Vis | Hypo L | + | Lost FU | Lost FU | |
| 17 | F | – | L | – | GKS | 18 | – | + | 3,2 | HH | Nod E | + | Omaya Reservoir, Excision | Improvement | |
| 37 | M | + | L | – | ns | ns | – | + | 15 | HH, N/V, AT | HR | + | Partial Excision | Improvement | |
| 55 | F | – | L | + | ns | ns | RIC | – | 12 | HH, N/V | HR, Het L | + | Excision | Improvement | |
| 7 | F | ns | L | ns | GKS Twice | 15,5a | – | + | 5 | HP | Het L | – | Excison | Improvement | |
| 39 | F | + | L | + | Linac | 18 | – | – | 12 | HH | HR, Het L, Multi Nod E | – | FU, Excision | Improvement | |
| 42 | F | – | L | + | Linac | 18 | RIC | + | 11 | AS | HR, Het L, Nod E | + | Partial Excision | Improvement | |
| 36 | M | – | L | + | Linac | 18 | RIC | + | 12 | AS | Nod E | + | Cyst evacuation, Excision | Improvement | |
| 31 | M | – | L | + | Linac | 18 | RIC | + | 10 | HH, SD | HR, Het L | + | Partial Excision | Improvement | |
| 62 | M | + | L | + | Linac | 18 | – | – | 13 | HP | HR, Het L, Multi Nod E | + | Steroids | Stable |
ns not specified, IC Internal Capsule, BG Basal Ganglia, L Lobar, C Cerebellum, Linac Linear Accelerator, GKS Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, RIC Radiation induced changes, RN Radionecrosis, HH Headache, N/V Nausea/Vomiting, Vis Visual deficit, SD Sensory Deficit, Memory Memory deficit, E Epilepsy, AS Asymptomatic, AT Ataxia, HR Hypointense Rim, Het L Heterogeneous Lesion, Hypo L Hypointense Lesion, Nod E Nodular Enhancement
a Average Marginal Dose
b Radiological and/or Clinical Improvement