| Literature DB >> 32698823 |
Larissa Sattler1, Wayne Hing2, Evelyne Rathbone2, Christopher Vertullo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) reduces pain and improves function in those suffering from severe osteoarthritis. A significant cost of TKA is post-acute care, however, current evidence suggests that discharge to an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) has inferior outcomes to home discharge, with no greater benefit in physical function. Only individual studies have investigated TKA patient characteristics predictive of discharge destination, therefore, the aim is to systematically review the literature and meta-analyse intrinsic patient factors predictive of IRF discharge. If predictive factors are known, then early discharge planning and intervention strategies could be implemented.Entities:
Keywords: Discharge; Meta-analysis; Predictors; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32698823 PMCID: PMC7376636 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03499-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Critical review databases and search terms
| Database | Search Terms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PubMed CINAHL Embase COCHRANE PEDro | “Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee” (MESH) OR Knee Replacement OR TKR | AND | Predict* OR Determin* OR Preoperative OR Factors OR Characteristic* OR Influence OR Affects | AND | Discharge* OR “Patient Discharge”[Mesh]) |
* = truncation search
Fig. 1Prisma Flow Diagram of systematic search, screening and selection process
Study Characteristics
| Author, Year. Country | Study Title | Study design; | Patient Factors | TKA | Age: | Female Gender: | Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anoushiravani et al., 2016. USA | Assessing In-Hospital Outcomes and Resource Utilization After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Underweight Patients. | Retrospective matched cohort.; Weight loss and obesity, due to the nature of the study, were excluded from the matching criteria. | BMI | 1315 | 70 (15–91 | 1029 (78) | Univariate |
| Crawford et al., 2011. USA | Preoperative Predictors of Length of Hospital Stay and Discharge Disposition Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Military Medical Center. | Retrospective cohort; Bilateral, revision, or uni-compartmental TKA. | Age ASA BMI | 383 | 64 (±10) | 214 (56) | Univariate and Multivariable regression |
| D’Apuzzo et al., 2015. USA | The John Insall Award: Morbid Obesity Independently Impacts Complications, Mortality, and Resource Use After TKA. | Retrospective matched cohort; Obesity, due to the nature of the study, was excluded from the matching criteria. Morbidly obese patients who could not be matched were excluded. | BMI | 180,585 | 61 (22–90) | 135,541 (75) | Univariate |
| Murphy et al., 2018. Australia | The Impact of Older Age on Patient Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. | Retrospective cohort | Age ASA BMI CCI Gender SF-12 PROM SES Smoking | 2838 | 70 (± 9) | 1882 (66) | Univariate and Multivariable regression |
| Prohaska et al., 2017. USA | Preoperative Body Mass Index and Physical Function are Associated with Length of Stay and Facility Discharge after Total Knee Arthroplasty | Prospective cohort; Bilateral procedures, simultaneous and staged within one year, and those with concomitant joint arthroplasty or ligament repair on the ipsilateral extremity were excluded. | Age BMI CCI Gender Hemoglobin Smoking VR-12 PROM | 716 | 63 (±11) | 425 (59) | Univariate and Multivariable regression |
| Rissman et al., 2016. USA | Predictors of Facility Discharge, Range of Motion, and Patient-Reported Physical Function Improvement After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Analysis | Prospective cohort; Simultaneous bilateral TKAs were excluded. | Age BMI CCI Gender ROM VR-12 PROM | 738 | 64 (±10) | 422 (57) | Univariate and Multivariable regression |
| Sayeed et al. 2016. USA | Comparing In-Hospital Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Resource Consumption Among Underweight and Morbidly Obese Patients | Retrospective matched cohort; Weight loss and obesity, due to the nature of the study, were excluded from the matching criteria. | BMI | 956 | 67 (15–91) | 791 (83) | Univariate |
| Schwarzkopf et al., 2016. USA | Factors Influencing Discharge Destination After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Database Analysis | Retrospective cohort | Age CCI Gender Ethnicity | 28,611 | 68 | 17,930 (63) | Multinomial regression |
| Sikora-Klak et al., 2016. USA | The Effect of Comorbidities on Discharge Disposition and Readmission for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients | Retrospective cohort Bilateral procedures were excluded as were patients undergoing joint arthroplasty for fracture. | Age BMI Diabetes Gender Smoking VTE history | 2009 | 65 (±11) | 1347 (67) | Univariate and Multivariable regression |
Abbreviations: ASA American society of anesthesiologists, BMI body mass index (kg/m2), CCI Charlson comorbidity index, Hb Hemoglobin, ROM range of motion, SES socioeconomic status, SF-12 12 item Short Form Health Survey (physical component score), VR-12 Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey, VTE Venous thromboembolism
aPredictors and Statistical Analysis are in reference to the outcome of interest, Discharge Destination
Results of risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool for included studies
| Study | Study participation | Study attrition | Prognostic factor measurement | Outcome measurement | Study confounding | Statistical analysis and reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anoushiravani | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate | Low |
| Crawford | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
| D’Apuzzo | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate | Low |
| Murphy | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Prohaska | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Rissman | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Sayeed | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
| Schwarzkopf | Low | Moderate | Low | Low | High | Low |
| Sikora-Klak | Low | Low | Low | Low | Moderate | Low |
Study participation = the representativeness of the study sample; Study attrition = whether participants with follow-up data represent persons enrolled in the study; Prognostic factor measurement = adequacy of prognostic factor measurement; Outcome measurement = adequacy of outcome measurement; Study confounding = potential confounding factors; Statistical analysis and reporting = the appropriateness of the statistical analysis and completeness of reporting
Intrinsic Patient Factors Predictive of Inpatient Rehabilitation Discharge
| Anoushiravani | Crawford | D’Apuzzo | Murphy | Prohaska | Rissman | Sayeed | Schwarzkopf | Sikora-Klak | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | ✓✓ | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | ✓✓ b | ✓✓ | 6/6 | |
| – | ✓✓ | – | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | 2/2 | |
| ✓ a,b | xb | ✓b | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | xb | – | – | 5/7 | |
| – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | ✓✓b | 4/4 | ||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | 1/1 | |
| – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | ✓✓b | ✓✓ | 5/5 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | – | 1/1 | |
| – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | – | – | – | – | 1/1 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | x | – | – | – | 0/1 | |
| – | – | – | ✓✓ | – | – | – | – | – | 1/1 | |
| – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | – | – | 3/3 | |
| – | – | – | ✓✓ | x | – | – | – | ✓ | 2/3 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | 1/1 |
Abbreviations: ASA American society of anesthesiologists, BMI body mass index (kg/m2), CCI Charlson comorbidity index, Hb Hemoglobin, ROM range of motion, SES socioeconomic status, SF-12 12 item Short Form Health Survey (physical component score), VR-12 Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey, VTE Venous thromboembolism
aBMI < 19 kg/m2 (Underweight patients)
bFactor not able to undergo pooled analysis due to statistical reporting heterogeneity
✓✓ = Factor significant in multivariable analysis ✓ = Factor only significant in univariate analysis x = Factor not significant in univariate analysis – indicates that a factor was not assessed
Fig. 2Meta-analysis showing the adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI of a random effects (RE) model for likelihood of discharge to IRF for females compared to males. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported
Fig. 3Adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI showing likelihood of discharge to IRF with older age. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported
Fig. 4Adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI showing likelihood of discharge to IRF with increase in BMI. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported
Fig. 5Adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI showing likelihood of discharge to IRF with higher CCI. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported
Fig. 6Meta-analysis showing the adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI of a random effects (RE) model for the effect of smoking on discharge to IRF. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported
Fig. 7Adjusted odds ratios and 95%CI showing likelihood of discharge to IRF with lower VR-12 score. Unadjusted odds ratios with 95%CI are also reported. ★The SF-12 Health Survey was used.