| Literature DB >> 32698543 |
Zuzana Vikartovska1,2, Maria Kuricova2, Jana Farbakova2, Tomas Liptak2, Dagmar Mudronova3, Filip Humenik1, Aladar Madari2, Marcela Maloveska1, Eva Sykova4, Dasa Cizkova1,4.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) involves nerve damage and often leads to motor, sensory and autonomic dysfunctions. In the present study, we have designed a clinical protocol to assess the feasibility of systemic delivery of allogenic canine bone marrow tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium (BMMSC CM) to dogs with SCI. Four client-owned dogs with chronic SCI lasting more than six months underwent neurological and clinical evaluation, MRI imaging and blood tests before being enrolled in this study. All dogs received four intravenous infusions with canine allogenic BMMSC CM within one month. Between the infusions the dogs received comprehensive physiotherapy, which continued for three additional months. No adverse effects or complications were observed during the one, three and six months follow-up periods. Neither blood chemistry panel nor hematology profile showed any significant changes. All dogs were clinically improved as assessed using Olby locomotor scales after one, three and six months of BMMSC CM treatment. Furthermore, goniometric measurements revealed partial improvement in the range of joint motion. Bladder function improved in two disabled dogs. We conclude that multiple delivery of allogenic cell-derived conditioned medium to dogs with chronic SCI is feasible, and it might be clinically beneficial in combination with physiotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: canine; conditioned medium; mesenchymal stem cells; regenerative medicine; spinal cord injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32698543 PMCID: PMC7404210 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21145129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Immunophenotyping of bone marrow tissue-derived MSC (BMMSC) at passage 3. (A) Note confluent population of BMMSC revealing spindle-shaped morphology. (B–D) Flow cytometry analyses of BMMSC expressing high percentage of mesenchymal markers CD29+ (88.5 ± 2.2%) and CD 90+ (77.3 ± 4.6%) and low percentage of hematopoietic markers CD 45+ (3.0 ± 1.7%). Scale bar A = 50 μm.
Figure 2Micrographs documenting multipotent characteristics of canine BMMSC. Note differentiation into osteocytes (B, Alizarin Red) compared to control (A) and chondrocytes (D), Alcian Blue) compared to control (C). Scale bars A, B, C, D = 50 μm.
Figure 3Locomotor function evaluated using Olby scale. The figure shows the Olby scores assessed in every dog during the study period. Values were obtained before therapy, then one, three and six months after therapy in each dog. Each measurement represents mean value of three measurements.
Goniometric measurements of mobility. (A, B, C) Measurements of flexion and extension according to the anatomical coordinates for shoulder, elbow, carpus, hip, stifle were performed in Dogs Z, B and M successively.
| A | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog Z | Right Limb | Left Limb | Normal Ranges | |||
| Before Treatment | After Treatment | Before Treatment | After Treatment | |||
| Shoulder |
| 30 ± 1 | 40 ± 1.7 | 25 ± 1.7 | 30 ± 1.7 | 30–60 |
|
| 140 ± 1.7 | 175 ± 2 | 165 ± 1 | 176 ± 1.7 | 160–170 | |
| Elbow |
| 35 ± 1.7 | 20 ± 1.7 | 30 ± 1 | 20 ± 2 | 20–40 |
|
| 175 ± 1 | 155 ± 1 | 160 ± 1.7 | 170 ± 3.4 | 160–170 | |
| Carpus |
| 16 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | 14 ± 1 | 20–35 |
|
| 220 ± 3.4 | 185 ± 1.7 | 220 ± 2.6 | 190 ± 1 | 190–200 | |
| Hip |
| 39 ± 2.6 | 39 ± 1 | 40 ± 1.7 | 40 ± 1 | 55 |
|
| 174 ± 2 | 140 ± 1.7 | 170 ± 2 | 157 ± 1 | 160–165 | |
| Stifle |
| 20 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 25 ± 1.7 | 17 ± 1.7 | 45 |
|
| 170 ± 1 | 175 ± 1 | 182 ± 1 | 168 ± 1 | 160–170 | |
| Tarsus |
| 25 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 40 |
|
| 165 ± 1 | 190 ± 1 | 185 ± 1.7 | 185 ± 1 | 170 | |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Shoulder |
| 48 ± 1 | 55 ± 2.6 | 89 ± 1.7 | 45 ± 2 | 30–60 |
|
| 137.5 ± 0.8 | 160 ± 2.6 | 178 ± 2 | 169 ± 1.3 | 160–170 | |
| Elbow |
| 26 ± 1 | 20 ± 2.6 | 25 ± 2 | 19 ± 1.7 | 20–40 |
|
| 143 ± 1 | 162 ± 1.5 | 175 ± 1.7 | 163 ± 1.7 | 160–170 | |
| Carpus |
| 14 ± 1.7 | 16 ± 2 | 15 ± 1.7 | 16 ± 1 | 20–35 |
|
| 163 ± 1 | 190 ± 2 | 175 ± 2 | 180 ± 2 | 190–200 | |
| Hip |
| 10 ± 2 | 10 ± 1.7 | 38 ± 1 | 32 ± 1 | 55 |
|
| 145 ± 1 | 129 ± 2 | 96 ± 2 | 145 ± 2.6 | 160–165 | |
| Stifle |
| 22 ± 2.6 | 25 ± 2 | 40 ± 2 | 45 ± 1.7 | 45 |
|
| 130 ± 1.7 | 145 ± 1.7 | 135 ± 1.7 | 155 ± 3 | 160–170 | |
| Tarsus |
| 30 ± 2 | 39 ± 2 | 20 ± 2.6 | 28 ± 1 | 40 |
|
| 145 ± 1.7 | 153 ± 2 | 145 ± 1 | 168 ± 1.7 | 170 | |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Shoulder |
| 45 ± 1 | 35 ± 2 | 49 ± 1.7 | 35 ± 2 | 30–60 |
|
| 185 ± 2 | 140 ± 1.7 | 200 ± 2 | 170 ± 2.6 | 160–170 | |
| Elbow |
| 35 ± 2 | 30 ± 1.7 | 28 ± 1 | 30 ± 1 | 20–40 |
|
| 218 ± 1.7 | 184 ± 1.7 | 183 ± 2 | 210 ± 2 | 160–170 | |
| Carpus |
| 19 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 19 ± 2 | 19 ± 1 | 20–35 |
|
| 168 ± 2 | 124 ± 1.7 | 210 ± 2 | 235 ± 2 | 190–200 | |
| Hip |
| 13 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 8 ± 1 | 20 ± 2 | 55 |
|
| 187 ± 1 | 180 ± 1.7 | 169 ± 1 | 180 ± 2.6 | 160–165 | |
| Stifle |
| 19 ± 2 | 22 ± 1 | 10 ± 1.7 | 20 ± 1 | 45 |
|
| 184 ± 1 | 170 ± 2 | 175 ± 2.6 | 130 ± 2 | 160–170 | |
| Tarsus |
| 35 ± 1.7 | 40 ± 1.7 | 25 ± 1.7 | 30 ± 1.7 | 40 |
|
| 185 ± 1 | 185 ± 1.7 | 173 ± 2 | 190 ± 1.7 | 170 | |
Figure 4Biochemistry parameters before treatment (before T) and after treatment (after T), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA), ALB (albumin), GLOB (globulin).
Hematology parameters before treatment (BT) and after treatment (AT), RBC (red blood cells), HCT (hematocrit), HGB (hemoglobin), MCV (mean corpuscular volume), MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin), MCHC (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration), RDW (red cell distribution width), RETIC (reticulocytes), WBC (white blood cells), NEU (neutrophils), LYM (lymphocytes), MONO (monocytes), EOS (eosinophils), BASO (basophiles), PLT (platelets), MPV (mean platelet volume), PDW (platelet distribution width), PCT (plateletcrit).
| Hematological Parameters | Dog B | Dog M | Dog T | Dog Z | Normal Ranges | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT | AT | BT | AT | BT | AT | BT | AT | ||
| RBC (×1012/L) | 5.97 | 8.09 | 7.53 | 7.97 | 8.75 | 6.27 | 6.24 | 7.35 | 5.65–8.87 |
| HCT (%) | 39.1 | 51.3 | 48.4 | 51.3 | 55.6 | 38.1 | 39.3 | 50.7 | 37.3–61.7 |
| HGB (g/DL) | 14.1 | 17.6 | 16.2 | 17.3 | 19 | 134 | 13.2 | 16.6 | 13.1–20.5 |
| MCV (fL) | 65.5 | 63.4 | 64.3 | 64.4 | 63.5 | 60.8 | 63 | 69 | 61.6–73.5 |
| MCH (pg) | 23.6 | 21.8 | 21.5 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 21.4 | 21.2 | 22.6 | 21.2–25.9 |
| MCHC (g/DL) | 36.1 | 34.3 | 33.5 | 33.7 | 34.2 | 35.2 | 33.6 | 32.7 | 32–37.9 |
| RDW (%) | 14.7 | 18.9 | 18.3 | 18.1 | 18.9 | 15.9 | 14.4 | 14.9 | 13.6–21.7 |
| %RETIC | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| RETIC (K/µL) | 44.8 | 57.4 | 48.9 | 73.3 | 12.3 | 15 | 20.6 | 33.8 | 10–110 |
| RETIC-HGB (pg) | 27.6 | 25.9 | 24.4 | 22.4 | 25.6 | 23.6 | 241 | 25.5 | 22.3–29.6 |
| WBC (×10⁹/L) | 9.91 | 11.1 | 9.7 | 9.18 | 7.52 | 15.46 | 11.93 | 6.22 | 5.05–16.76 |
| %NEU | 67.7 | 74.7 | 71.1 | 71 | 72 | 72.2 | 75.5 | 65 | 60–77 |
| %LYM | 20.6 | 16.6 | 21.2 | 23.3 | 21.9 | 19.1 | 11.7 | 26.8 | 12–30 |
| %MONO | 6.6 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 3–10 |
| %EOS | 5.1 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 8.2 | 1.1 | 2–10 |
| %BASO | 0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 0–1 |
| NEU (×10⁹/L) | 6.71 | 8.3 | 6.89 | 6.52 | 5.41 | 11.16 | 9.01 | 4.04 | 2.95–11.64 |
| LYM (×10⁹/L) | 2.04 | 1.84 | 2.06 | 2.14 | 1.65 | 2.95 | 1.39 | 1.67 | 1.05–5.10 |
| MONO (×10⁹/L) | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.91 | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.16–1.12 |
| EOS (×10⁹/L) | 0.1 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.42 | 0.98 | 0.07 | 0.06–1.23 |
| BASO (×10⁹/L) | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.00–0.10 |
| PLT (K/µL) | 376 | 254 | 164 | 348 | 245 | 293 | 387 | 268 | 148–484 |
| MPV (fL) | 12 | 11.6 | 16.7 | 10 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 11.2 | 10.2 | 8.7–13.2 |
| PDW (fL) | 11.9 | 10 | not measured | 10.2 | 11.3 | 10.5 | 9.4 | 10.7 | 9.1–19.4 |
| PCT (%) | 0.45 | 0.9 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.3 | 0.14–0.46 |
An overview of dogs enrolled in the study.
| Breed | Dogs Name | Lesion Site | Age | Gender | Body Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-tzu | Zuzi (Dog Z) | T11-L1 | 4 | Female | 5.4 kg |
| German Shepherd | Bak (Dog B) | T13-L2 | 6 | Male | 24 kg |
| Yorkshire Terrier | Max (Dog M) | T11-T12 | 5 | Male | 4 kg |
| Bichon | Tia (Dog T) | T13-L1 | 4 | Female | 6.4 kg |
Figure 5Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of thoracolumbar segments of dogs with spinal cord injury (SCI). (A) Sagittal T2-weighted image of the thoracolumbar spine in Dog Z. Hyperintense diffused intramedullary lesion is visible from vertebra T11 to L1. At the level cranially to the T11–T12 intervertebral disc space there is a cyst-like lesion affecting the whole spinal cord diameter. (B) Sagittal SSE image of the thoracolumbar spine in Dog B. Hyperintense diffused intramedullary lesion is visible at the level from T13 to L2 vertebra. (C) Transversal T2-weighted image of Dog T spine at the level of T13 vertebra. Focal hyperintense intramedullary lesion with hypointense center is visible at the level of vertebra T13–L1 (yellow circle). (D) Transversal T1-weighted image of Dog M spine at the level of T12 vertebra. Focal hypointense intramedullary lesion is visible at the level of vertebra T11–T12. This lesion was also hyperintense on T2-weighted images (yellow arrows point to damaged spinal cord tissue, green arrows to normal tissue). Scale bars A, C and D = 1 cm.
Figure 6Design of treatment protocol. Chronological procedures performed before, during and after bone marrow tissue-derived MSC conditioned medium (BMMSC CM) treatment. FC (flow cytometry), M (month), i.v. (intravenous), SCI (spinal cord injury), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging).