Literature DB >> 32698169

BMP-2 and hMSC dual delivery onto 3D printed PLA-Biogel scaffold for critical-size bone defect regeneration in rabbit tibia.

Shi Huan Han1,2, Misun Cha3, Yuan-Zhe Jin4, Kyung-Mee Lee5, Jae Hyup Lee1,5,6.   

Abstract

3D printing technology has various advantages, and the incorporation of bioactive substances into the 3D printed scaffold provides the biological and architectural characteristics of the scaffolds, which is very important for obtaining a good osseointegration effect. In this relation, this study prepared a novel porous hollow cage poly(lactic acid) (PLA) 3D printed scaffold and combined recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and/or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with Biogel composed of gelatin and alginate. Then, the scaffolds were used to evaluate the resulting bone regeneration through both in vitro and in vivo tests. The experimental group was divided into four groups as follows: only PLA scaffold (PLA); PLA scaffold filled with BMP-2 loaded on Biogel (P-BG-B2); PLA scaffold filled with MSCs encapsulated Biogel (P-BG-M); PLA scaffold filled with both BMP-2 and MSCs loaded on Biogel (P-BG-B2-M). Then in vitro results showed that the PLA-Biogel-based scaffold increased cell proliferation, and the P-BG-B2-M group showed a higher alkaline phosphatase activity and bone-related gene expression than was seen with the P-BG-M group at all the time points. It was shown that four weeks post-operative micro-CT analysis showed that within the defect site the P-BG-B2 group had a significantly higher percent bone volume (BV/TV) than the PLA group and P-BG-M group. And, out of the defect site, the P-BG-B2-M group BV/TV was shown significantly higher than the PLA group (p < 0.05). Histologically, defects in the P-BG-B2-M group showed a homogeneous new bone distribution, however the P-BG-B2 group and P-BG-M group presented a notably higher bone formation in the internal region than in the proximal region of the bone defect site. In conclusion, the 3D PLA-Biogel-based scaffold adapted rhBMP-2 and MSCs with carrier PLA showed good biocompatibility and high possibility as an effective and satisfactory bone graft material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32698169     DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aba879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  5 in total

1.  The healing of bone defects by cell-free and stem cell-seeded 3D-printed PLA tissue-engineered scaffolds.

Authors:  Marjan Bahraminasab; Athar Talebi; Nesa Doostmohammadi; Samaneh Arab; Ali Ghanbari; Sam Zarbakhsh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Multifunctional Hydrogels for the Treatment of Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Weiwei Xin; Yingjian Gao; Bing Yue
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Osteogenic Response of MC3T3-E1 and Raw264.7 in the 3D-Encapsulated Co-Culture Environment.

Authors:  Jungju Kim; Hao-Zhen Lyu; Chisung Jung; Kyung Mee Lee; Shi Huan Han; Jae Hyup Lee; Misun Cha
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  PLA/Hydroxyapatite scaffolds exhibit in vitro immunological inertness and promote robust osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells without osteogenic stimuli.

Authors:  Marcela P Bernardo; Bruna C R da Silva; Ahmed E I Hamouda; Marcelo A S de Toledo; Carmen Schalla; Stephan Rütten; Roman Goetzke; Luiz H C Mattoso; Martin Zenke; Antonio Sechi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Biodegradable 3D Printed Scaffolds of Modified Poly (Trimethylene Carbonate) Composite Materials with Poly (L-Lactic Acid) and Hydroxyapatite for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Honglei Kang; Xudong Jiang; Zhiwei Liu; Fan Liu; Guoping Yan; Feng Li
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.