Literature DB >> 32697710

The ultra brief checklist for suicidality.

Seowon Yoon1, Kiho Park2, Kee-Hong Choi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurately identifying patients at an elevated risk of suicide in minimal time is an important mental health issue. Therefore, we developed the Ultra Brief Checklist for Suicidality (UBCS) and reported its psychometric properties.
METHODS: We studied 544 participants who had completed the UBCS, other self-report measures, and structured clinical interviews by trained interviewers. We explored the psychometric properties of the UBCS's paper-based and online versions by identifying optimal cutoff points, sensitivity, specificity, etc. of all participants.
RESULTS: The mean score of the UBCS (paper-pencil version) in the no-suicide-risk group was 0.23 (SD = 0.73), while in the Risk-Positive (RP) and the High-Risk (HR) groups it was 3.54 (SD = 3.22) and 6.31 (SD = 3.97), respectively. Optimal cutoff points for the RP and HR groups were 1 (AUC = 0.914) and 3 (AUC = 0.928), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The current findings apply only to adults, not to children or adolescents. The original MINI was used as the assessment instrument's reference standard rather than MINI 7.0.2 of DSM-5. Predictive validity was not addressed as this was not a longitudinal cohort study.
CONCLUSIONS: The UBCS was rigorously tested and validated. More than half the participants completed the UBCS within a minute. It possesses adequate psychometric properties and can be easily administered with minimal clinician time and effort, via paper or Internet. We believe it can contribute to suicide risk identification and timely interventions.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brief; Screening; Self-report; Sensitivity; Specificity; Suicide

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697710     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Current State and Validity of Digital Assessment Tools for Psychiatry: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nayra A Martin-Key; Benedetta Spadaro; Erin Funnell; Eleanor Jane Barker; Thea Sofie Schei; Jakub Tomasik; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2022-03-30

2.  Investigating how individual differences influence responses to the COVID-19 crisis: The role of maladaptive and five-factor personality traits.

Authors:  Yeoul Han; Jihee Jang; Eunsil Cho; Kee-Hong Choi
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2021-02-23

3.  Predicting Personality and Psychological Distress Using Natural Language Processing: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Jihee Jang; Seowon Yoon; Gaeun Son; Minjung Kang; Joon Yeon Choeh; Kee-Hong Choi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.