Literature DB >> 32697153

Understanding preload and preload reserve within the conceptual framework of a limited range of possible left ventricular end-diastolic volumes.

Roger E Peverill1,2.   

Abstract

Preload has been variously defined, but if there is to be a direct relationship with activity of the Frank-Starling mechanism in its action to increase the force and extent of contraction, preload must directly reflect myocardial stretch. The Frank-Starling mechanism is activated during any stretch of a cardiac chamber beyond its resting size, which is present immediately before contraction. Every left ventricle has an intrinsic and limited range of possible volumes at end diastole. There is a curvilinear relationship between left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and, at maximal or near maximal LVEDV, there will be a high LVEDP. Within the possible range, the LVEDV will be determined by the extent of filling, any change in LVEDV will result in changed activity of the Frank-Starling mechanism, and change in LVEDV might, therefore, be considered to represent change in preload. On the other hand, it is the difference between the current and the maximal possible LVEDV (or the preload reserve) that may be of the most clinical relevance. There is a reciprocal relationship between preload and preload reserve, with minor or absent LV preload reserve indicating that there will be either minimal or no increase in stroke volume following intravenous fluid administration. As left atrial pressure can remain within the normal range when the LVEDP is elevated, it is LVEDP, and not left atrial pressure, that provides the most reliable guide to preload reserve in an individual at a specific period in time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frank-Starling mechanism; left ventricle; preload; preload reserve

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697153     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00043.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamic dysfunction in neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Ashraf Kharrat; Amish Jain
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Impaired Left Ventricular Circumferential Midwall Systolic Performance Appears Linked to Depressed Preload, but Not Intrinsic Contractile Dysfunction or Excessive Afterload, in Paradoxical Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Dorota Długosz; Andrzej Surdacki; Barbara Zawiślak; Stanisław Bartuś; Bernadeta Chyrchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Non-linearity of end-systolic pressure-volume relation in afterload increases is caused by an overlay of shortening deactivation and the Frank-Starling mechanism.

Authors:  Moriz A Habigt; Michelle Krieger; Jonas Gesenhues; Maike Ketelhut; Mare Mechelinck; Marc Hein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sequential Coupling Shows Minor Effects of Fluid Dynamics on Myocardial Deformation in a Realistic Whole-Heart Model.

Authors:  Jochen Brenneisen; Anna Daub; Tobias Gerach; Ekaterina Kovacheva; Larissa Huetter; Bettina Frohnapfel; Olaf Dössel; Axel Loewe
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

5.  Transmural Distribution of Coronary Perfusion and Myocardial Work Density Due to Alterations in Ventricular Loading, Geometry and Contractility.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Ravi Namani; Jenny S Choy; Ghassan S Kassab; Lik Chuan Lee
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The Impact of Deep Y Descent on Hemodynamics in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function.

Authors:  Daisuke Harada; Hidetsugu Asanoi; Takahisa Noto; Junya Takagawa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.