| Literature DB >> 32695772 |
Zhang Longlong1, Li Xinxiang2, Ge Yaqiong3, Wei Wei2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the utility of texture analysis for predicting the pathological degree of differentiation of pancreatic carcinoma (PC).Entities:
Keywords: contrast-enhanced CT; machine learning; pancreatic carcinoma; pathological grading; texture analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32695772 PMCID: PMC7339088 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Screening and grouping flow chart of enrolled cases in this study.
Comparison of the clinical data of the cases grouped according to the degree of differentiation.
| Degree of pathological differentiation | Number of cases (patients) | Sex | Age (year) | CT value (Hu) | ||
| Male | Female | Arterial phase | Venous phase | |||
| Poor differentiation | 13 | 9 | 4 | 42∼76 | 52.1 ± 9.2 | 67.7 ± 8.4 |
| Moderate-poor differentiation | 36 | 24 | 12 | 43∼76 | 56.2 ± 9.4 | 72.5 ± 13.2 |
| Moderate-poor differentiation | 34 | 21 | 13 | 41∼75 | 65.7 ± 9.9 | 84.5 ± 11.7 |
| χ2 = 0.303 | ||||||
| >0.5 | >0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | |||
FIGURE 2Enhanced CT images of moderately differentiated PC in the arterial phase (a) and venous phase (c); the treatment ROI using ITK-SNAP software (b,d).
FIGURE 3The best texture features obtained by the random forest, The arterial phase (A), the venous phase (B), and the combined group (C).
Features measured with different texture analysis methods by AK software.
| Texture feature groups | Parameters |
| Mean, Variance, Uniformity, Skewness, Kurtosis, Energy, Entropy | |
| Volume CC, Surface, Surface Volume Ratio, Compactness, Maximum 3D Diameter | |
| Entropy, Inertia, Inverse Difference Moment; | |
| Short Run Emphasis, Low Gray Level Run Emphasis, Short Run Low Gray Level Emphasis; | |
| Small Zone Emphasis, Low Gray Level Zone Emphasis, Short Run Low Gray Level Emphasis |
FIGURE 4(A,B) represent the training and test groups with moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated, and moderate-poorly differentiated pathologies of PC. (C,D) represent the AUC values of the venous phase of the training and test groups with moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated and moderate-poorly differentiated PC. (E,F) represent the combined groups (Class 0 means moderately differentiated, Class 1 means poorly differentiated, Class 2 means moderate-poorly differentiated, Res means the rest of the cases).
Sensitivity and specificity of the arterial and venous phases training and test groups of PC with different degrees of differentiation.
| Phase | Arterial | Phase | Venous | ||||
| Group | Sensitivity | Specificity | Group | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
| Training group: Accuracy 0.77(95%CI:0.64–0.87) | Class 0 | 0.63 | 0.86 | Training group: Accuracy 0.77(95%CI:0.62–0.86) | Class 0 | 0.50 | 0.94 |
| Class 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Class 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Class 2 | 0.81 | 0.74 | Class 2 | 0.92 | 0.65 | ||
| Test group: Accuracy 0.74(95%CI:0.52–0.89) | Class 0 | 0.80 | 0.69 | Test group: Accuracy 0.70(95%CI:0.47–0.86) | Class 0 | 0.50 | 0.85 |
| Class 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Class 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Class 2 | 0.60 | 0.84 | Class 2 | 0.80 | 0.62 | ||