| Literature DB >> 32695733 |
Takashi Himoto1, Keiko Miyatake2, Takashi Maeba3, Tsutomu Masaki4.
Abstract
We sought to identify the frequencies of presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to cross-sectionally determine the nutritional and dietary factors associated with loss of skeletal muscle mass in such patients. Dietary and body component changes produced by a diet intervention were longitudinally investigated. Forty-six NAFLD patients (24 males and 22 females) were enrolled. A second diet treatment was performed at 6 months after entry in 19 of the enrolled patients (6 males and 13 females). Body compositions and dietary nutrients at six months later were compared with those at entry. Three of the 24 (13%) males and four of the 22 (18%) females fulfilled the criteria for presarcopenia and one (5%) female NAFLD patient was in the criteria for sarcopenia at baseline. None of the patients were in the criteria for sarcopenic obesity. The factors associated with skeletal muscle index in the males were body mass index (BMI), insulin-like growth factor-1, total energy intake, and lipid intake, but only BMI and bone mineral density in females at baseline. The diet intervention decreased the skeletal muscle mass in the 6 males by decreasing the total energy intake via lower protein and lipid intakes and improved their liver dysfunction. In the 13 females, a decrease in total energy intake via lower carbohydrate and lipid intake did not change the skeletal muscle mass. These results suggest that loss of skeletal muscle mass is frequently observed in nonobese NAFLD patients and that the frequency of sarcopenic obesity seems to be rare in NAFLD patients. The nutritional and dietary factors that regulate loss of skeletal muscle mass were distinct between our male and female NAFLD patients. Thus, the skeletal muscle mass of such patients as well as their body weight and liver function should be monitored during diet interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32695733 PMCID: PMC7368962 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3576974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2291-2789
Clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients.
| Parameter | Male ( | Female ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.4 ± 14.0 | 56.3 ± 9.4 | 0.1037 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.2 ± 3.0 | 26.0 ± 3.7 | 0.7585 |
| SMI (kg/m2) | 7.80 ± 0.72 | 6.44 ± 0.82 | <0.0001 |
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 37.7 ± 6.5 | 23.2 ± 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| BMD (g/cm2) | 1.26 ± 0.31 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | 0.1184 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 46.0 ± 31.0 | 31.9 ± 21.6 | 0.0765 |
| FIB-4 index | 1.10 ± 0.50 | 1.40 ± 0.77 | 0.2060 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 123.9 ± 26.9 | 138.2 ± 37.9 | 0.1263 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 142.1 ± 84.8 | 148.2 ± 81.0 | 0.6521 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.73 ± 0.42 | 5.88 ± 0.53 | 0.6139 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.04 ± 1.04 ( | 2.89 ± 1.70 ( | 0.2701 |
| BTR | 7.48 ± 1.34 ( | 6.66 ± 1.12 | 0.0495 |
| 25-OH-vitamin D3 (ng/ml) | 18.4 ± 6.1 ( | 16.1 ± 4.1 | 0.3622 |
| Zinc ( | 76.7 ± 12.9 ( | 72.8 ± 11.3 | 0.3754 |
| Free testosterone (pg/ml) | 9.3 ± 3.2 | ND | ND |
| Concurrent T2DM | 5 (17%) | 6 (27%) | 0.4336 |
| Concurrent dyslipidemia | 10 (42%) | 13 (59%) | 0.1881 |
| Concurrent hypertension | 4 (17%) | 3 (14%) | 0.551 |
ND, not determined.
Frequencies of presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity in the male and female NAFLD patients.
| Criteria | Male ( | Female ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Presarcopenia | 3 (13%) | 4 (18%) | 0.449 |
| Sarcopenia | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) | 0.4783 |
| Sarcopenic obesity | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.9999 |
Profile of the NAFLD patients with loss of skeletal muscle mass.
| Gender | Age | Criteria | SMI | Hand grip strength | BMI | Body fat (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 75 | Sarcopenia | 4.68 | rt: 15.2 kg | 22.7 | 44.1 |
| lt: 13.5 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 52 | Presarcopenia | 5.45 | rt: 19.2 kg | 20.3 | 31.7 |
| lt: 19.1 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 54 | Presarcopenia | 5.58 | rt: 26.1 kg | 19.5 | 28.9 |
| lt: 21.5 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 62 | Presarcopenia | 5.27 | rt: 20.0 kg | 21.1 | 35.5 |
| lt: 22.1 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 75 | Presarcopenia | 5.73 | rt: 20.5 kg | 23.8 | 35.2 |
| lt: 23.2 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Male | 67 | Presarcopenia | 6.33 | rt: 31.6 kg | 23.6 | 32.6 |
| lt: 28.6 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Male | 34 | Presarcopenia | 6.99 | rt: 37.9 kg | 24.4 | 32.6 |
| lt: 34.0 kg | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Male | 63 | Presarcopenia | 6.6 | rt: 26.2 kg | 26.1 | 37.4 |
| lt: 26.5 kg | ||||||
rt, right; lt, left.
Nutritional and dietary factors associated with SMI in male patients at baseline.
| Parameter |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ALT ( | 0.0596 | 0.7749 |
| IGF-1 ( | 0.5426 | 0.0212 |
| HOMA-IR ( | −0.0182 | 0.9565 |
| 25-OH-vitamin D3 ( | 0.1269 | 0.5518 |
| Zinc ( | −0.2825 | 0.1851 |
| BTR ( | 0.083 | 0.697 |
| FIB-4 index ( | −0.0509 | 0.8072 |
| BMD ( | 0.6785 | 0.0965 |
| Free testosterone ( | 0.2418 | 0.4023 |
| BMI ( | 0.657 | 0.0016 |
| Total energy intake ( | 0.6429 | 0.0162 |
| Protein intake ( | 0.1036 | 0.6984 |
| Leucine intake ( | 0.1464 | 0.5838 |
| Lipid intake ( | 0.5429 | 0.0422 |
| Carbohydrate intake ( | 0.0643 | 0.8099 |
Nutritional and dietary factors associated with SMI in female patients at baseline.
| Parameter |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ALT ( | 0.1352 | 0.5355 |
| IGF-1 ( | 0.1839 | 0.4483 |
| HOMA-IR ( | 0.0333 | 0.9249 |
| 25-OH-vitamin D3 ( | 0.0877 | 0.6879 |
| Zinc ( | 0.0724 | 0.7401 |
| BTR ( | −0.1621 | 0.4577 |
| FIB-4 index ( | −0.3845 | 0.078 |
| BMD ( | 0.697 | 0.0366 |
| BMI ( | 0.8944 | <0.0001 |
| Total energy intake ( | −0.1847 | 0.4463 |
| Protein intake ( | −0.129 | 0.5948 |
| Leucine intake ( | −0.2817 | 0.2454 |
| Lipid intake ( | −0.0258 | 0.9152 |
| Carbohydrate intake ( | −0.2425 | 0.3173 |
Figure 1Changes in nutritional components by the diet treatment in the male patients. Horizontal bars represent the average value of each parameter. Broken lines correspond to patients whose total energy intake was increased by the diet treatment. (a) SMI. (b) Total energy intake. (c) Protein intake. (d) Lipid intake. (e) Carbohydrate intake.
Figure 2Changes in body compositions by the diet treatment in the male patients. Horizontal bars represent the average value of each parameter. (a) Body weight. (b) ALT. (c) SMI. (d) Skeletal muscle mass. (e) Body fat mass. (f) Hand grip strength.
Figure 3Changes in nutritional components by the diet treatment in the female patients. Horizontal bars represent the average value of each parameter. (a) SMI. (b) Total energy intake. (c) Protein intake. (d) Lipid intake. (e) Carbohydrate intake.
Figure 4Changes in body compositions by the diet treatment in the female patients. Horizontal bars represent the average value of each parameter. (a) Body weight. (b) ALT. (c) SMI. (d) Skeletal muscle mass. (e) Body fat mass. (f) Hand grip strength.