| Literature DB >> 32695399 |
Qiong Li1,2, Wei Zhang1,2, Jiali Li1,2, Jingkang Xiong1,2, Jia Liu1,2, Ting Chen1,2, Qin Wen1,2, Yunjing Zeng1,2, Li Gao1,2, Lei Gao1,2, Cheng Zhang1,2, Peiyan Kong1,2, Xiangui Peng1,2, Yao Liu1,2, Xi Zhang1,2, Jun Rao1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The early detection of tumors upon initial diagnosis or during routine surveillance is important for improving survival outcomes. Here, we investigated the feasibility and clinical significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection for Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENTKL).Entities:
Keywords: Circulating tumor DNA; ENKTL; Minimal residual disease; Mutation allele frequency; Prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32695399 PMCID: PMC7366898 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-020-00205-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Res ISSN: 2050-7771
Fig. 1Consort diagram of patient enrolment and specimen collection
Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics
| Prognostic variables | No. | Proportion(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 45 | 69.23 |
| Female | 20 | 30.77 |
| I | 14 | 21.54 |
| II | 20 | 30.77 |
| III | 13 | 20.00 |
| IV | 18 | 27.69 |
| With | 26 | 40.00 |
| Without | 39 | 60.00 |
| 1 | 22 | 33.85 |
| 2 | 24 | 36.92 |
| 3 | 14 | 21.54 |
| 4 | 5 | 7.69 |
| With | 9 | 13.85 |
| Without | 56 | 86.15 |
| Low | 33 | 50.77 |
| High | 32 | 49.23 |
Fig. 2The mutational profile of newly diagnosed ENKTL. The heatmap shows individual nonsynonymous somatic mutations detected in the ctDNA of newly diagnosed patients (n = 65). Each row represents a gene, and each column represents a primary tumor. Mutations are color coded in red. The upper bar graph shows the number and type of mutated genes, the horizontal bar graph shows the gene mutation frequency, the middle bar graph shows the percentage of nonsynonymous somatic mutations, and the lower graph shows the clinical characteristics of each sample
Fig. 3Concordance of the ctDNA assessment with the tissue NGS test. a The consistent gene mutation spectrum and mutation allele frequency detected in the plasma ctDNA and tumor tissue of the patients. b Venn diagram summarizing the detailed mutations discovered in both plasma ctDNA (gray) and tumor DNA (blue). c For each patient, the fraction of tumor biopsy-confirmed mutations that were detected in plasma ctDNA is shown. The gray portion of the bar marks the part of the tumor biopsy-confirmed mutation that was not found in the plasma ctDNA
Fig. 4Correlation of the ctDNA assessment with the patient clinical characteristics. a Linear regression of the plasma ctDNA concentration with metabolic tumor volume. b Mutation allele frequencies of KMT2D, APC, ATM, ASXL3 and JAK3 in patients with different tumor stages. c The correlation between plasma EBV-DNA levels and metabolic tumor volume. d The general metabolic tumor volume in patients with different mutation statuses of KMT2D, APC, ATM, ASXL3, JAK3 and TP53. e The correlation of the EBV-DNA level with the ctDNA concentration
Fig. 5Serial ctDNA detection during therapy could complement the response assessment of the patients. Treatment response assessment using PET/CT was combined with genomic testing of the ctDNA and plasma EBV-DNA levels. Plasma and imaging were performed at baseline prior to treatment initiation, before the start of cycle 4 (C4), and before cycle 8 (C8). Displayed are recruited patients with serial plasma collection and their responses to treatment using the plasma EBV-DNA, ctDNA assessment and PET/CT scans
Fig. 6Prognostic value of frequently mutated genes for patients with ENKTCL. a Immunohistopathology staining of KMT2D in patients with mutated KMT2D and wild type, scale bar, 25 μm. Kaplan-Meier estimated OS with the plasma KMT2D (b), ATM (c), APC (d), ASXL3 (e), JAK3 (f), SETD2 (g) mutation status in patients with ENKTL, and plasma EBV-DNA levels (h)
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the overall survival of patients
| Prognostic variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Gender (female vs. male) | 0.712 (0.279–1.812) | 0.476 | ||
| Stage (I-II vs. III-IV) | 2.625 (1.043–6.604) | 0.04 | 1.159 (0.253–5.311) | 0.849 |
| B symphony (with vs. without) | 1.234 (0.512–2.973) | 0.64 | ||
| IPI | 2.595 (1.073–6.277) | 0.034 | 0.565 (0.118–2.712) | 0.476 |
| Final recurrence status | 3.346 (1.364–8.204) | 0.008 | 2.705 (0.941–7.776) | 0.065 |
| MTV | 2.069 (0.843–5.078) | 0.112 | ||
| ctDNA concentration | 2.975 (0.984–8.997) | 0.053 | ||
| EBV-DNA level | 3.672 (1.396–9.664) | 0.008 | 3.174 (1.091–9.231) | 0.034 |
| 0.289 (0.119–0.702) | 0.006 | 0.266 (0.086–0.828) | 0.022 | |
| 0.550 (0.16–1.895) | 0.344 | |||
| 0.271 (0.098–0.752) | 0.012 | 0.212 (0.064–0.700) | 0.011 | |
| 2613 (0.347–19.68) | 0.351 | |||
| 0.569 (0.166–1.949) | 0.369 | |||
| 0.804 (0.184–3.507) | 0.771 | |||
| 0.615 (0.179–2.115) | 0.441 | |||
| 0.410 (0.120–1.406) | 0.156 | |||