| Literature DB >> 32694555 |
Dong Kyu Choi1, Young Kyu Kim1, Sang Wook Park1, Heejin Lee1,2, Seul Lee1, Sang A Kim3, Soo Jin Kim3, Junyeop Lee4, Wanil Kim5, Sang-Hyun Min6, Ji Hoon Yu7.
Abstract
Histone modifications, including histone lysine methylation, regulate gene expression in the vasculature, and targeting tumor blood vessels through histone modification decreases tumor growth. SETD8, a methyltransferase that catalyzes the mono-methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 is known to promote tumorigenesis in various cancers and its high levels of expression are related to poor prognosis. However, the detailed mechanisms by which SETD8 stimulates tumor progression and angiogenesis are still not well understood. Recent studies have demonstrated that, in vitro, BVT-948 efficiently and selectively suppresses SETD8 activity and histone methylation levels. In this study, we showed that BVT-948-mediated SETD8 inhibition in HUVECs results in an inhibition of angiogenesis. Inhibition of SETD8 not only inhibited angiogenesis but also disrupted actin stress fiber formation and induced cell cycle arrest at S phase. These effects were accompanied by increased HES-1 expression levels, decreased osteopontin levels, and a decreased differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into endothelial cells. Interestingly, BVT-948 treatment reduced pathological angiogenesis in mouse OIR model. These data illustrate the mechanisms by which SETD8 regulates angiogenesis and may enable the use of a SETD8 inhibitor to treat various pathological conditions that are known to be associated with excessive angiogenesis, including and tumor growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32694555 PMCID: PMC7374624 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69103-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SETD8 inhibition by BVT-948 decreases endothelial cell migration and tube formation in HUVECs. (A) Representative western blot images showing the expression of H4K20me1 after BVT-948 (1 and 5 μM) treatment for 24 h. (B) Left: Phase contrast images showing a HUVEC wound healing assay after treatment with 5 μM WDR-5, 5 μM MM-102, or 5 μM BVT-948 for 16 h. DMSO was used as the control. Right: Relative wound density (%) was measured using Incucyte ZOOM software in real time manner. (C) Representative phase contrast images showing tube formation by HUVECs after treatment with DMSO or BVT-948 (5 μM) for 12 h. The number of branch points in a field was defined as the point of contact of three or more endothelial tubes. *p < 0.01 versus control. (D) HUVECs were incubated with BVT-948 (5 μM) for 6 h or 24 h and the relative expression level of CD31 was assessed. The expression of CD31 was normalized to that of GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. *p < 0.01 versus DMSO control.
Figure 2BVT-948 treatment disrupts actin stress fiber in HUVECs. (A) Immunofluorescence image showing actin stress fiber. HUVECs were treated with BVT-948 (5 μM) in the presence of LSGS supplement for 24 h and stained with FITC-conjugated phalloidin. Scale bars = 50 μm (B) Relative expression of Actin in HUVECs after 5 μM BVT-948 treatment for 24 h. (C) Immunoblotting showing the expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in HUVECs treated with various concentration of BVT-948 for 24 h. (D) Immunoblots showing the levels of phospho-ERK, ERK, and vinculin in HUVECs treated with BVT-948 for 24 h. The membrane was probed with anti-phospho ERK antibody. Then the membrane was reprobed with anti-ERK antibody after stripping.
Figure 3BVT-948 treatment decreases the proliferation of HUVECs. (A) Cells were treated with 1 or 5 μM BVT-948 for 24 h and cells viability was measured using CCK-8. *p < 0.01 versus control. (B) Cells were treated with 1or 5 μM BVT-948 for 24 h and cell cycle was analyzed after PI staining. *p < 0.01 versus control. (C) Various cell cytotoxicity monitoring dyes were used to assess cytotoxicity in BVT-948 (1 and 5 μM) treated HUVECs and number of positive cells were counted using the Incucyte ZOOM system after 24 h of treatment. Left: Number of annexin V+ cells. Middle: Number of cleaved caspase 3/7+ cells. Right: Number of YoYo-1+ cells. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D of three independent experiments.
Figure 4BVT-948 induced inhibition of angiogenesis is mediated through decreased osteopontin expression. (A) The relative expression of HES-1 in HUVECs treated with 5 μM BVT-948 was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. *p < 0.01 versus DMSO control. (B) Left: immunofluorescence images showing the expression of HES-1 in HUVECs. Right: Representative western blot images showing the expression of HES-1 HUVECs treated with various concentrations of BVT-948. (C) Western blot showing the expression levels of osteopontin in HUVECs treated or not with 5 μM BVT-948 in the presence or absence of LSGS supplement. (D) Phase contrast images showing HUVEC tube formation. HUVECs were treated with 1 μM BVT-948 treated in the presence or absence of osteopontin (20 ng/mL) and the number of branch points in a given field was counted. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; #p < 0.05 versus control. (E) Western blot image showing the expression levels of FN1 and SNAIL in HUVECs treated or not with 5 μM BVT-948. TGF-β or PBS was treated after 30 min of BVT-948 treatment.
Figure 5BVT-948 suppresses developmental and pathological angiogenesis. (A) Representative FACS analysis of the number of CD31+ endothelial cells in differentiated human iPSCs. Human iPSCs were differentiated into endothelial cells for 3 days in the presence of either DMSO or BVT-948 (5 μM). The percentage of the pan-endothelial cell marker CD31 expressing cells was measured by flow cytometry *p < 0.01 versus DMSO control. (B) Representative images showing vascular network in the retina of OIR mice. Mice were treated with BVT-948 for 5 days and retinas were immunostained with CD31 and NG2, Scale bars = 100 μm. (C, D) Comparisons of CD31+ blood vessels and NG2+ neovascular tufts (NVT) in OIR model. (Each group, n = 10) *P < 0.01 versus control.