Literature DB >> 32694208

Thermodynamic energetics underlying genomic instability and whole-genome doubling in cancer.

Francoise Remacle1,2, Thomas G Graeber3,4,5,6,7, R D Levine8,9,5,6,10.   

Abstract

Genomic instability contributes to tumorigenesis through the amplification and deletion of cancer driver genes. DNA copy number (CN) profiling of ensembles of tumors allows a thermodynamic analysis of the profile for each tumor. The free energy of the distribution of CNs is found to be a monotonically increasing function of the average chromosomal ploidy. The dependence is universal across several cancer types. Surprisal analysis distinguishes two main known subgroups: tumors with cells that have or have not undergone whole-genome duplication (WGD). The analysis uncovers that CN states having a narrower distribution are energetically more favorable toward the WGD transition. Surprisal analysis also determines the deviations from a fully stable-state distribution. These deviations reflect constraints imposed by tumor fitness selection pressures. The results point to CN changes that are more common in high-ploidy tumors and thus support altered selection pressures upon WGD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploid; free energy; genomic instability; surprisal analysis; whole-genome doubling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32694208      PMCID: PMC7414060          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920870117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Information-theoretic analysis of phenotype changes in early stages of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  F Remacle; Nataly Kravchenko-Balasha; Alexander Levitzki; R D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of coevolutionary signatures in protein interaction dynamics, complex inference, molecular recognition, and mutational landscapes.

Authors:  Faruck Morcos; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Cross-talk between Lysine-Modifying Enzymes Controls Site-Specific DNA Amplifications.

Authors:  Sweta Mishra; Capucine Van Rechem; Sangita Pal; Thomas L Clarke; Damayanti Chakraborty; Sarah D Mahan; Joshua C Black; Sedona E Murphy; Michael S Lawrence; Danette L Daniels; Johnathan R Whetstine
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Derek Y Chiang; Gad Getz; David B Jaffe; Michael J T O'Kelly; Xiaojun Zhao; Scott L Carter; Carsten Russ; Chad Nusbaum; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Surprisal analysis of transcripts expression levels in the presence of noise: a reliable determination of the onset of a tumor phenotype.

Authors:  Ayelet Gross; Raphael D Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Elena Helman; Aaron McKenna; Hui Shen; Travis Zack; Peter W Laird; Robert C Onofrio; Wendy Winckler; Barbara A Weir; Rameen Beroukhim; David Pellman; Douglas A Levine; Eric S Lander; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  De novo prediction of human chromosome structures: Epigenetic marking patterns encode genome architecture.

Authors:  Michele Di Pierro; Ryan R Cheng; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Peter G Wolynes; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution.

Authors:  Sally M Dewhurst; Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; Andrew J Rowan; Eva Grönroos; David Endesfelder; Tejal Joshi; Dmitri Mouradov; Peter Gibbs; Robyn L Ward; Nicholas J Hawkins; Zoltan Szallasi; Oliver M Sieber; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Recurrent patterns of DNA copy number alterations in tumors reflect metabolic selection pressures.

Authors:  Nicholas A Graham; Aspram Minasyan; Anastasia Lomova; Ashley Cass; Nikolas G Balanis; Michael Friedman; Shawna Chan; Sophie Zhao; Adrian Delgado; James Go; Lillie Beck; Christian Hurtz; Carina Ng; Rong Qiao; Johanna Ten Hoeve; Nicolaos Palaskas; Hong Wu; Markus Müschen; Asha S Multani; Elisa Port; Steven M Larson; Nikolaus Schultz; Daniel Braas; Heather R Christofk; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Thomas G Graeber
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 13.068

View more
  1 in total

1.  Whole-Genome Duplication Shapes the Aneuploidy Landscape of Human Cancers.

Authors:  Kavya Prasad; Mathew Bloomfield; Hagai Levi; Kristina Keuper; Sara V Bernhard; Nicolaas C Baudoin; Gil Leor; Yonatan Eliezer; Maybelline Giam; Cheng Kit Wong; Giulia Rancati; Zuzana Storchová; Daniela Cimini; Uri Ben-David
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 13.312

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.