Literature DB >> 32693047

Factors Associated With Delay of Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Debra T Choi1, Jessica A Davila2, Shubhada Sansgiry3, Eric David4, Hardeep Singh2, Hashem B El-Serag5, Yvonne Hsiao-Fan Sada6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We examined the frequency of and factors associated with delays in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, we collected and analyzed data from the Veterans Health Administration's electronic health records. We used a multivariate logistic regression model to identify factors associated with a delay in diagnosis of HCC of more than 60 days following a red flag (defined as the earliest date at which a diagnosis of HCC could have been made, based on American Association for the Study of Liver Disease 2005 guidelines). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the effects of delayed diagnosis on survival, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 655 patients with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of HCC from 2006 through 2011, 46.9% had a delay in diagnosis of more than 60 days following a red flag for HCC. Delays in diagnosis for more than 60 days were significantly associated with lack of provider adherence to the guidelines (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.82; 95% CI, 3.12-7.45), a diagnostic imaging evaluation instead of only measurement of alfa fetoprotein (adjusted OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.09-6.24), and diagnosis as an incidental finding during examination for an unrelated medical problem (compared with an HCC-related assessment) (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.09-4.67). Diagnostic delays of 60 days or more were associated with lower mortality compared to patients without a delay in diagnosis (unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.68 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of veterans with cirrhosis have delays in diagnosis of HCC of 60 days or more after a red flag, defined by guidelines. Interventions are needed to improve timely follow-up of red flags for HCC and adherence to guidelines, to increase early detection of HCC. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver Cancer; Surveillance; Testing; VA

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32693047      PMCID: PMC7855025          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   13.576


  47 in total

1.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in adults.

Authors:  S D Ryder
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Implementation of LI-RADS into a radiological practice.

Authors:  Stefan T Siedlikowski; Ania Z Kielar; Eleanor L Ormsby; Bijan Bijan; Christopher Kagay
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-01

3.  AASLD practice guidelines: Evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Karen F Murray; Robert L Carithers
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: one world, one cancer-different guidelines?

Authors:  Friedrich Foerster; Peter Robert Galle
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  AASLD clinical practice guidelines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendations.

Authors:  Christopher Koh; Xiongce Zhao; Niharika Samala; Sasan Sakiani; T Jake Liang; Jayant A Talwalkar
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Practice patterns and attitudes of primary care providers and barriers to surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Eimile Dalton-Fitzgerald; Jasmin Tiro; Pragathi Kandunoori; Ethan A Halm; Adam Yopp; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Haoran Sun; Tianqiang Song
Journal:  Drug Discov Ther       Date:  2015-10

Review 8.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Aya Kamaya; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Amit G Singal; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Status of, and strategies for improving, adherence to HCC screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Giampiero Francica; Mauro Borzio
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2019-07-24

10.  Do diagnostic delays in cancer matter?

Authors:  R D Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prolonged Diagnostic Intervals as Marker of Missed Diagnostic Opportunities in Bladder and Kidney Cancer Patients with Alarm Features: A Longitudinal Linked Data Study.

Authors:  Yin Zhou; Fiona M Walter; Hardeep Singh; William Hamilton; Gary A Abel; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Using Telemedicine to Facilitate Patient Communication and Treatment Decision-Making Following Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Review for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Debra T Choi; Yvonne H Sada; Shubhada Sansgiry; David E Kaplan; Tamar H Taddei; Jason K Aguilar; Michael Strayhorn; Ruben Hernaez; Jessica A Davila
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Analysis of diagnostic delay and its influencing factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhongshang Dai; Yiming Ma; Zijie Zhan; Ping Chen; Yan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.