J P Wood1, J Archer1, M W Calfee1, S Serre2, L Mickelsen2, A Mikelonis1, L Oudejans1, M Hu1,3, S Hurst4, V K Rastogi5. 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Land and Emergency Management, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 3. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. 4. Excet Inc., Springfield, VA, USA. 5. U.S. Army Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To obtain quantitative efficacy data of two ultraviolet light (UVC) technologies for surface inactivation of Bacillus anthracis Ames and Bacillus atrophaeus spores. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spores were deposited onto test coupons and controls of four different materials, via liquid suspension or aerosol deposition. The test coupons were then exposed to UVC light from either a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp or a system comprised of light emitting diodes, with a range of dosages. Positive controls were held at ambient conditions and not exposed to UVC light. Following exposure to UVC, spores were recovered from the coupons and efficacy was quantified in terms of log10 reduction (LR) in the number of viable spores compared to that from positive controls. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination efficacy varied by material and UVC dosage (efficacy up to 5·7 LR was demonstrated). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between the two species or between inoculation methods. Efficacy improved for the LED lamp at lower relative humidity, but this effect was not observed with the mercury vapor lamp. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study will be useful in determining whether UVC could be used for the inactivation of B. anthracis spores on different surface types.
AIMS: To obtain quantitative efficacy data of two ultraviolet light (UVC) technologies for surface inactivation of Bacillus anthracis Ames and Bacillus atrophaeus spores. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spores were deposited onto test coupons and controls of four different materials, via liquid suspension or aerosol deposition. The test coupons were then exposed to UVC light from either a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp or a system comprised of light emitting diodes, with a range of dosages. Positive controls were held at ambient conditions and not exposed to UVC light. Following exposure to UVC, spores were recovered from the coupons and efficacy was quantified in terms of log10 reduction (LR) in the number of viable spores compared to that from positive controls. CONCLUSIONS: Decontamination efficacy varied by material and UVC dosage (efficacy up to 5·7 LR was demonstrated). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between the two species or between inoculation methods. Efficacy improved for the LED lamp at lower relative humidity, but this effect was not observed with the mercury vapor lamp. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study will be useful in determining whether UVC could be used for the inactivation of B. anthracis spores on different surface types.
Authors: Joseph P Wood; Kathryn M Meyer; Thomas J Kelly; Young W Choi; James V Rogers; Karen B Riggs; Zachary J Willenberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jin Hyeok Yim; Kwang Young Song; Hyunsook Kim; Dongryeoul Bae; Jung Whan Chon; Kun Ho Seo Journal: J Vet Sci Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 1.672