Yamini Kalidindi1,2, Jeah Jung2, Roger Feldman3, Thomas Riley4. 1. Now with The Moran Company, Arlington, Virginia. 2. Department of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. 3. Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis. 4. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey.
Abstract
Importance: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs are highly effective in curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Previous simulations showed extended life as a key health advantage of DAA drugs, but real-world evidence on the association between DAA treatment and reduced mortality is limited. Objectives: To examine the association of DAA treatment with mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with hepatitis C. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare claims data of beneficiaries who sought hepatitis C care for the first time between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, after at least a 1-year washout period. Medicare Part D files were used in identifying DAA therapy initiation and completion. Death dates, demographic data, and indicators of health risks were obtained from the Master Beneficiary Summary Files. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C were considered as patients with DAA treatment if they initiated DAA therapy during the study period. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C who did not initiate DAA therapy during the study period were considered as patients without DAA treatment. Patients without DAA treatment were selected using 1-to-1 propensity score matching. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Exposures: Completion of DAA treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death from the index date of seeking hepatitis C care after at least a 1-year washout period. Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying exposure were used to compare mortality rates between propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment. Separate analyses were performed for patients with or without cirrhosis. Heterogeneity in the association between DAA treatment and mortality by sex and dual-eligibility status was examined. Results: A propensity score-matched sample of 51 478 Medicare beneficiaries with a mean (SD) age of 59.4 (11.1) years and 30 473 men (59.2%) was assessed. Of this total, 8240 patients (16.0%) had cirrhosis (5224 men [63.4%]; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [9.7] years) and 43 238 patients (84.0%) had no cirrhosis (25 249 men [58.4%]; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [11.3] years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment in the cirrhosis group was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.38-0.56] vs HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.47-0.60]; P = .27) or dual-eligibility status (non-dual-eligible HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] vs dual-eligible HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.44-0.57]; P = .80) in the cirrhosis group. The adjusted HR of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment among patients without cirrhosis was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.58). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46-0.60] vs HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.50-0.60]; P = .66) among patients without cirrhosis. However, the survival advantage associated with DAAs for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries was statistically significantly higher than for dual-eligible beneficiaries among patients without cirrhosis (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55] vs HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.62]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, DAA treatment appeared to be associated with a decrease in mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with or without cirrhosis. These findings suggest that increasing access to DAA drugs for all patients with HCV infection, regardless of disease progression, could improve population health.
Importance: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs are highly effective in curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Previous simulations showed extended life as a key health advantage of DAA drugs, but real-world evidence on the association between DAA treatment and reduced mortality is limited. Objectives: To examine the association of DAA treatment with mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with hepatitis C. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare claims data of beneficiaries who sought hepatitis C care for the first time between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, after at least a 1-year washout period. Medicare Part D files were used in identifying DAA therapy initiation and completion. Death dates, demographic data, and indicators of health risks were obtained from the Master Beneficiary Summary Files. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C were considered as patients with DAA treatment if they initiated DAA therapy during the study period. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C who did not initiate DAA therapy during the study period were considered as patients without DAA treatment. Patients without DAA treatment were selected using 1-to-1 propensity score matching. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Exposures: Completion of DAA treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death from the index date of seeking hepatitis C care after at least a 1-year washout period. Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying exposure were used to compare mortality rates between propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment. Separate analyses were performed for patients with or without cirrhosis. Heterogeneity in the association between DAA treatment and mortality by sex and dual-eligibility status was examined. Results: A propensity score-matched sample of 51 478 Medicare beneficiaries with a mean (SD) age of 59.4 (11.1) years and 30 473 men (59.2%) was assessed. Of this total, 8240 patients (16.0%) had cirrhosis (5224 men [63.4%]; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [9.7] years) and 43 238 patients (84.0%) had no cirrhosis (25 249 men [58.4%]; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [11.3] years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment in the cirrhosis group was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.38-0.56] vs HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.47-0.60]; P = .27) or dual-eligibility status (non-dual-eligible HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] vs dual-eligible HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.44-0.57]; P = .80) in the cirrhosis group. The adjusted HR of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment among patients without cirrhosis was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.58). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46-0.60] vs HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.50-0.60]; P = .66) among patients without cirrhosis. However, the survival advantage associated with DAAs for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries was statistically significantly higher than for dual-eligible beneficiaries among patients without cirrhosis (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55] vs HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.62]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, DAA treatment appeared to be associated with a decrease in mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with or without cirrhosis. These findings suggest that increasing access to DAA drugs for all patients with HCV infection, regardless of disease progression, could improve population health.
Authors: Lisa I Backus; Derek B Boothroyd; Barbara R Phillips; Pamela Belperio; James Halloran; Larry A Mole Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Amit G Singal; Nicole E Rich; Neil Mehta; Andrea D Branch; Anjana Pillai; Maarouf Hoteit; Michael Volk; Mobolaji Odewole; Steven Scaglione; Jennifer Guy; Adnan Said; Jordan J Feld; Binu V John; Catherine Frenette; Parvez Mantry; Amol S Rangnekar; Omobonike Oloruntoba; Michael Leise; Janice H Jou; Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri; Laura Kulik; George N Ioannou; Annsa Huang; Tram Tran; Hrishikesh Samant; Renumathy Dhanasekaran; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Reena Salgia; Sheila Eswaran; Prasun Jalal; Avegail Flores; Sanjaya K Satapathy; Sofia Kagan; Purva Gopal; Robert Wong; Neehar D Parikh; Caitlin C Murphy Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Adriaan J van der Meer; Bart J Veldt; Jordan J Feld; Heiner Wedemeyer; Jean-François Dufour; Frank Lammert; Andres Duarte-Rojo; E Jenny Heathcote; Michael P Manns; Lorenz Kuske; Stefan Zeuzem; W Peter Hofmann; Robert J de Knegt; Bettina E Hansen; Harry L A Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: In Sung Cho; Ye Rin Chae; Ji Hyeon Kim; Hae Rin Yoo; Suk Yong Jang; Gyu Ri Kim; Chung Mo Nam Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Nezam Afdhal; K Rajender Reddy; David R Nelson; Eric Lawitz; Stuart C Gordon; Eugene Schiff; Ronald Nahass; Reem Ghalib; Norman Gitlin; Robert Herring; Jacob Lalezari; Ziad H Younes; Paul J Pockros; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Sanjeev Arora; G Mani Subramanian; Yanni Zhu; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Jenny C Yang; Phillip S Pang; William T Symonds; John G McHutchison; Andrew J Muir; Mark Sulkowski; Paul Kwo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey B Ames; Maya Djerboua; Norah A Terrault; Christopher M Booth; Jennifer A Flemming Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2022-03-09