Susan K Lutgendorf1,2,3,4, Frank Penedo5,6, Michael J Goodheart2,4, Laila Dahmoush7, Jesusa M G Arevalo8,9, Premal H Thaker10, George M Slavich9,11, Anil K Sood12,13,14, Steve W Cole8,9,11. 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 3. Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 4. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 6. Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 7. Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 8. Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 9. Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 10. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 11. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 12. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 13. Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 14. Center for RNA Interference and Noncoding RNA, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social isolation has shown robust associations with clinical outcomes in the general population and in patients with cancer. In patients with ovarian cancer, social isolation has been found to be related to decreased survival and multiple biomarkers supporting tumor progression. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the relationship between social isolation and the molecular characteristics of ovarian tumors. Herein, the authors have used genome-wide transcriptional profiling to quantify associations between social isolation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) polarization in ovarian tumors and transcriptome-driven, promoter-based bioinformatics analyses to identify gene regulatory pathways that may potentially underlie these changes. METHODS: Tumor was sampled during primary surgical resection and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. After RNA extraction, microarray analysis of the transcriptome was performed and samples were analyzed to assess associations between EMT-related gene transcripts and social isolation (as indicated by a Social Provisions Scale Attachment subscale score <15). Convergent validation was provided by a promoter-based bioinformatic analysis of transcription factor activity. RESULTS: Primary analyses of 99 women demonstrated a lower average expression of gene transcripts previously associated with epithelial differentiation in women with high social isolation (-0.143 ± 0.048 log2 mRNA abundance; P = .004), but no difference in mesenchymal differentiation as a function of social isolation (+0.007 ± 0.0064 log2 mRNA abundance; P = .900). Upregulated activity was shown for 3 of the 4 targeted EMT-related transcription factors, including GATA4 (P = .014); SMAD2, SMAD3, and/or SMAD4 (P < .001); and TWIST1 (P < .001). Analyses of SNAIL2/SLUG activity indicated a directional trend toward increased activity that did not reach statistical significance (P = .123). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study demonstrated differential EMT polarization and EMT-related transcription factor activity according to social isolation, a known socioenvironmental risk factor. LAY SUMMARY: Social isolation has shown robust associations with clinical outcomes in the general population and in patients with cancer. Herein, the authors examined the relationship between social isolation and the molecular characteristics of ovarian tumors. The authors investigated the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process whereby tumor cells lose epithelial characteristics and become more embryonic (mesenchymal), thereby enhancing invasiveness. Primary analyses demonstrated lower expression of genes previously associated with epithelial differentiation and increased activity of specific EMT-related transcription factors in individuals with high social isolation, indicating increased EMT polarization in these patients. These findings extend the understanding of how socioenvironmental factors may modulate tumor growth.
BACKGROUND: Social isolation has shown robust associations with clinical outcomes in the general population and in patients with cancer. In patients with ovarian cancer, social isolation has been found to be related to decreased survival and multiple biomarkers supporting tumor progression. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the relationship between social isolation and the molecular characteristics of ovarian tumors. Herein, the authors have used genome-wide transcriptional profiling to quantify associations between social isolation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) polarization in ovarian tumors and transcriptome-driven, promoter-based bioinformatics analyses to identify gene regulatory pathways that may potentially underlie these changes. METHODS:Tumor was sampled during primary surgical resection and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. After RNA extraction, microarray analysis of the transcriptome was performed and samples were analyzed to assess associations between EMT-related gene transcripts and social isolation (as indicated by a Social Provisions Scale Attachment subscale score <15). Convergent validation was provided by a promoter-based bioinformatic analysis of transcription factor activity. RESULTS: Primary analyses of 99 women demonstrated a lower average expression of gene transcripts previously associated with epithelial differentiation in women with high social isolation (-0.143 ± 0.048 log2 mRNA abundance; P = .004), but no difference in mesenchymal differentiation as a function of social isolation (+0.007 ± 0.0064 log2 mRNA abundance; P = .900). Upregulated activity was shown for 3 of the 4 targeted EMT-related transcription factors, including GATA4 (P = .014); SMAD2, SMAD3, and/or SMAD4 (P < .001); and TWIST1 (P < .001). Analyses of SNAIL2/SLUG activity indicated a directional trend toward increased activity that did not reach statistical significance (P = .123). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study demonstrated differential EMT polarization and EMT-related transcription factor activity according to social isolation, a known socioenvironmental risk factor. LAY SUMMARY: Social isolation has shown robust associations with clinical outcomes in the general population and in patients with cancer. Herein, the authors examined the relationship between social isolation and the molecular characteristics of ovarian tumors. The authors investigated the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process whereby tumor cells lose epithelial characteristics and become more embryonic (mesenchymal), thereby enhancing invasiveness. Primary analyses demonstrated lower expression of genes previously associated with epithelial differentiation and increased activity of specific EMT-related transcription factors in individuals with high social isolation, indicating increased EMT polarization in these patients. These findings extend the understanding of how socioenvironmental factors may modulate tumor growth.
Authors: Candyce H Kroenke; Yvonne L Michael; Elizabeth M Poole; Marilyn L Kwan; Sarah Nechuta; Eric Leas; Bette J Caan; John Pierce; Xiao-Ou Shu; Ying Zheng; Wendy Y Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Erica L Johnsen; Brian Cooper; Barrie Anderson; Joel I Sorosky; Richard E Buller; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Caroline P Le; Cameron J Nowell; Corina Kim-Fuchs; Edoardo Botteri; Jonathan G Hiller; Hilmy Ismail; Matthew A Pimentel; Ming G Chai; Tara Karnezis; Nicole Rotmensz; Giuseppe Renne; Sara Gandini; Colin W Pouton; Davide Ferrari; Andreas Möller; Steven A Stacker; Erica K Sloan Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jennifer M Knight; Mallory R Taylor; Kelly E Rentscher; Elisabeth C Henley; Hannah A Uttley; Ashley M Nelson; Lucie M Turcotte; Natalie S McAndrew; Hermioni L Amonoo; Lathika Mohanraj; Debra Lynch Kelly; Erin S Costanzo Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Aeson Chang; Erica K Sloan; Michael H Antoni; Jennifer M Knight; Rachel Telles; Susan K Lutgendorf Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Michaela G Cuneo; Angela Szeto; Andrew Schrepf; Premal H Thaker; Michael Goodheart; Steve W Cole; Anil K Sood; Philip M McCabe; Armando J Mendez; Susan K Lutgendorf Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.864
Authors: Kelly E Rentscher; Xingtao Zhou; Brent J Small; Harvey J Cohen; Asma A Dilawari; Sunita K Patel; Traci N Bethea; Kathleen M Van Dyk; Zev M Nakamura; Jaeil Ahn; Wanting Zhai; Tim A Ahles; Heather S L Jim; Brenna C McDonald; Andrew J Saykin; James C Root; Deena M A Graham; Judith E Carroll; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 6.860