Literature DB >> 32691469

Existential Risks to Humanity Should Concern International Policymakers and More Could Be Done in Considering Them at the International Governance Level.

Matt Boyd1, Nick Wilson2.   

Abstract

In this perspective, we consider the possible role of the United Nations (UN) with respect to existential risks to human civilization and the survival of humanity. We illustrate how existential risks have been discussed at an international governance level, specifically in documents in the UN Digital Library. In this large corpus, discussions of nuclear war account for over two-thirds (69%, 67/97) of mentions of existential risks, while mention of other existential risks, or such risks as a category, appears scant. We take these observations to imply inadequate attention to these significant threats. These deficits, combined with the need for a global response to many risks, suggest that UN member nations should urgently advocate for appropriate action at the UN to address threats, such as artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, geoengineering, and supervolcanic eruption, in analogous fashion to existing attempts to mitigate the threats from nuclear war or near-Earth objects.
© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; United Nations; catastrophic risk; existential risk; nuclear war; synthetic biology

Year:  2020        PMID: 32691469     DOI: 10.1111/risa.13566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  1 in total

1.  Global policymakers and catastrophic risk.

Authors:  Christopher Nathan; Keith Hyams
Journal:  Policy Sci       Date:  2021-12-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.