Shashank Sarvepalli1, Ari Garber2, Carol A Burke2, Niyati Gupta3, Mounir Ibrahim4, John McMichael5, Gareth Morris-Stiff5, Amit Bhatt2, John Vargo2, Maged Rizk2, Michael B Rothberg3,6. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St, Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. shashank.sarvepalli@gmail.com. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Meridian Health Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ, USA. 5. Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) is associated with reduced adenoma detection. However, limited research has examined the impact of different commercial bowel preparations (CBPs) on IBP and adenoma detection. We aim to determine whether type of CBP used is associated with IBP or adenoma detection. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated outpatient, screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed in the Cleveland Clinic health system between January 2011 and June 2017. IBP was defined by the Aronchick scale. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to assess the association between CBP type and IBP and adenoma detection. Fixed effects were defined as demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and colonoscopy factors. Random effect of individual endoscopist was considered. RESULTS: Of 153,639 colonoscopies, 75,874 records met inclusion criteria. Median age was 54; 50% were female; 17.7% had IBP, and adenoma detection rate was 32.6%. In adjusted analyses, compared to GoLYTELY, only NuLYTELY [OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.60, 0.72)] and SuPREP [OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.40, 0.69)] were associated with reduced IBP. Adenoma detection did not vary based on the type of bowel preparation used. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy, choice of CBP was not associated with adenoma detection. Decisions about CBP should be based on other factors, such as tolerability, cost, or safety.
BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) is associated with reduced adenoma detection. However, limited research has examined the impact of different commercial bowel preparations (CBPs) on IBP and adenoma detection. We aim to determine whether type of CBP used is associated with IBP or adenoma detection. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated outpatient, screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed in the Cleveland Clinic health system between January 2011 and June 2017. IBP was defined by the Aronchick scale. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to assess the association between CBP type and IBP and adenoma detection. Fixed effects were defined as demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and colonoscopy factors. Random effect of individual endoscopist was considered. RESULTS: Of 153,639 colonoscopies, 75,874 records met inclusion criteria. Median age was 54; 50% were female; 17.7% had IBP, and adenoma detection rate was 32.6%. In adjusted analyses, compared to GoLYTELY, only NuLYTELY [OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.60, 0.72)] and SuPREP [OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.40, 0.69)] were associated with reduced IBP. Adenoma detection did not vary based on the type of bowel preparation used. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy, choice of CBP was not associated with adenoma detection. Decisions about CBP should be based on other factors, such as tolerability, cost, or safety.
Authors: Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han; Yil Sik Hyun; Joong Ho Bae; Hye Sun Park; Tae Yeob Kim; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Hassan Siddiki; Sreya Ravi; Mohanad T Al-Qaisi; Ayman R Fath; Francisco Ramirez; Michael D Crowell; Rahul Pannala; Douglas O Faigel; Suryakanth R Gurudu Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Gabriel Perreault; Adam Goodman; Sebastian Larion; Ahana Sen; Kirsten Quiles; Michael Poles; Renee Williams Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-28