Pengyu Zhao1, Xueyan Han2, Lili You2, Yu Zhao3, Li Yang2, Yuanli Liu4. 1. Perking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science& Perking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Nursing Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. School of Public Health, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China liuyl_fpo@126.com.
This study focused on the neonatal mortality and neonatal health service in China before and after the introduction of the Basic Public Health Service (BPHS) in 2009.The neonatal mortality rates (1991–2017), maternal health management rates and neonatal visit rates (2000–2017) were analysed using the segmented linear regression model.The segmented linear regression model controlled auto-correlated errors and potential serial correlations in the longitudinal data while provided level change and trend changes of the outcome measures before and after the BPHS implementation.Due to limited data accessibility, this study did not assess the effectiveness of the BPHS project at the provincial or county levels.We could not control for other factors affecting the neonatal health outcomes through trend analysis, such as the health service quality, delivery place and so on.
Introduction
Mortality at younger age is a key measure of population health.1 Reducing mortality rates among children under 5 years was one of the eight millennium development goals (MDGs).2 In the Sustainable development goals, reducing neonatal and under-5 mortality was also a priority.3 It had been reported that neonatal deaths account for 44% of the childhood mortality.4 Approximately 2.9 million babies did not survive beyond the neonatal period (first 28 days of life) worldwide,5 and most of these deaths occurred in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). The leading causes of neonatal death globally were birth asphyxia,6 prematurity, sepsis and congenital malformation,7 indicating that interventions should focus on the healthcare management of the pregnancy, delivery and the postnatal periods. The WHO has made strong recommendations8 9 to: (1) at least four times of antenatal visits and at least three times of postpartum visits for the pregnant women during pregnancy; (2) delivery in hospital; (3) neonatal care. It had been estimated that if these programmes could be implemented worldwide, they may potentially reduce up to 1 million neonatal death per year.10 Therefore, effective interventions to promote neonatal healthcare would be important for LMICs, in reducing childmortality and achieving MDGs-4. Moreover, it has been found that home visits for neonatal care by community medical staff were associated with reduced neonatal mortality in resource-limited settings with poor healthcare accessibility.11 In LMICs7 like Brazil, Uganda and Ghana, the neonatal mortality had been largely reduced through better coverage of primary healthcare, hospital delivery and vaccinations.The Chinese government endorsed the MDGs-4 in 2000,12 and had since introduced many programmes to improve maternal and neonatal healthcare, such as the ‘Reducing Maternal Mortality and Eliminating Neonatal Tetanus’ programme in 200013 and the New Cooperative Medical Scheme in 2003.14 The under-5 mortality rate had reduced to 18.5 per 1000 live births by the end of 2008,15 which not only made China achieve the MDGs-4 7 years ahead of the 2015 target date, but also making China the eighth country to achieve this target worldwide.16 During this period, there was also a huge reduction in neonatal mortality rate (NMR) (33.1–10.2 per 1000 live births from 1991 to 2008). However, the gap of NMRs between urban and rural areas still exists. The NMR in urban and rural areas in 2008 were 5.0 and 12.3 per 1000 live births, respectively.15 This gap might cause by the regional inequality and insufficiency in health service delivery.17 In such context, the Chinese government launched the Basic Public Health Service (BPHS) project in 2009,18 which aimed at improving health service continuity and regional equality in the primary healthcare setting. This government-fund project originally included 9 categories in 200919 and in 2019 it contained 17 categories. The services related to neonatal health included the maternal health management during pregnancy as well as the neonatal visits, which aimed at protecting the newborns from the beginning of the pregnancy to the early days of their births. To address the rural–urban disparities in neonatal health services, the BPHS project required standardised quality and quantity of health services during the implementation, and all the medical staff involved were required to be trained according to national standards.By the year of 2017, the national NMR had decreased to 4.5 per 1000 live births (urban areas: 2.6; rural areas: 5.3) and the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas was narrowed. Nevertheless, whether this decrease in neonatal mortality and the improvement in rural–urban equality can be linked to the BPHS project has not been evaluated using robust methods, such as the segmented linear regression model. This model can quantify the level change and trend change while controlling for auto-correlated errors20 21 and adjusting for potential serial correlation of the data. It has been used in many previous studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health service programmes and medical interventions.22 23This paper aims at assessing the effects of the BPHS project on reducing NMR in China. Specifically, trends of the annual NMR, the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas, maternal health management rate (MMR) and neonatal visit rate before and after the implementation of BPHS project would be measured. The associations between MMR, neonatal visit rate and NMR were also explored. The results of this study may provide references to health administrators in designing and implementing health projects aiming at reducing NMR and increasing regional equality in China and other LMICs.
Methods
Study design and data collection
We conducted a longitudinal study of national NMR and the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas from 1991 to 2017, and neonatal related health service rate in BPHS project, including MMR and neonatal visit rate from 2000 to 2017 in China with the time-series design of before-and-after assessment.The neonatal related health services in BPHS project included the maternal health management during pregnancy and neonatal visit. The maternal health management include: the establishment of health record of mother and children within the first 13 weeks of pregnancy, the five antenatal visits within the first 13 weeks, 16–20 weeks, 21–24 weeks, 28–36 weeks, 37–40 weeks of pregnancy, respectively and postnatal visits within 7 days after delivery. Every antenatal examination included an inspection of family history, disease history, gynaecological examinations, blood routines, urine routines, liver function tests, kidney function tests, hepatitis B examination and so on. The medical staff also offer lifestyle, psychological and nutritional guidance for the mother. The neonatal visit refers to a visit to a newborn’s home by medical staff within a week of discharge from the hospital, and the services include: enquiry the birth status (birth weight, body length), vaccination status (BCG (Bacillus Calmette - Guerin) vaccine and the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine), physical examination, feeding, sleeping, urination, jaundice, umbilical cord, temperature and oral cavity development of the neonatal; the guidance on feeding, development, disease prevention, injury prevention and oral healthcare are provided for parents according to the specific situation of the neonatal. For the neonatal with high risk factors such as low birth weight, premature birth, twins or birth defects, the number of neonatal visits should be increased according to the actual situation.
Data sources
The national NMR, urban NMR and rural NMR data were extracted from National Neonatal Mortality Surveillance System which was set up by the Chinese government in 1989. The sampling unit of the system was at the county (district) level. A total of 336 surveillance spots (126 urban areas and 210 rural areas), covering 31 provinces, were selected to record the changes in NMR. The data were collected by trained officials and verified by government administrators. In our study, the national NMR data and the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas between 1991 and 2017 were extracted and calculated from the system. The data of the neonatal related health services indicators in BPHS project from 2000 to 2017 were extracted from National Health Statistics Yearbook. The two indexes are the MMR and the neonatal visit rate. The data of these indicators were collected and verified at the provincial level and being uploaded to the Ministry of Health annually. The data are then presented in the National Health Statistic Yearbook published by the Ministry of Health.24
Outcome measures
The official definition of NMR of WHO is the deaths among the live births during the 28 completed days of life, which can be subdivided into early neonatal death (deaths between 0 and 7 completed days of birth) and late neonatal death (deaths after 7 days to 28 completed days of birth).25 According to the data collection protocol in China, the NMR was defined as the neonatal death in total and did not distinguish early neonatal death and late neonatal death. The gap of NMR between urban and rural areas equals the rural NMR minus urban NMR. The MMR and the neonatal visit rate were two of the government mandated indicators to measure the service provision of the maternal and neonatal health services in China. The MMR is defined as the proportion of pregnant women who have accepted at least five antenatal visits during pregnancy, one postpartum visit and establish the health records by the professionals during the first 13 weeks of pregnancy among all the women resulting in live births. The neonatal visit rate is defined as the proportions of the neonatal who have accepted at least one neonatal visit by medical staff at home within a week of hospital discharge among all the live births.
Statistical analysis
We analysed the time series data using the segmented linear regression model with statistical software (SPSS, V.21.0) to access changes in levels and trends of national NMR, the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas, MMR and neonatal visit rate before and after the introduction of BPHS project. We regarded the year 2009 as the intervention time point for the implementation of BPHS project. Segmented linear regression divided the time series into pre-2009 and post-2009 segments. We then compared the changes in trends and levels of national NMR, the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas, MMR and neonatal visit rate before and after the introduction of BPHS project. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to measure the correlation between NMR and MMR, as well as NMR and neonatal visit rate. The statistical significance level was set at alpha=0.05.
Patient and public involvement
Patients and the public were not involved. Participants were not involved in developing the research questions or planning the study.
Results
The yearly national NMR, urban NMR and rural NMR from 1991 to 2017 was displayed in online supplementary file 1. The national NMR ranged from 10.2 to 33.1 per 1000 live births from 1991 to 2008, which reduced to a range of 4.5–9.0 per 1000 live births during 2009–2017 after the introduction of BPHS project.The NMR in urban and rural areas ranged between 5.0–12.5 per 1000 live births and 12.3–37.9 per 1000 live births, respectively during 1991–2008, which went down to a range of 2.6–4.5 per 1000 live births and 5.3–12.3 per 1000 live births during 2009–2017. The gap of NMR between urban and rural areas ranged from 7.3 to 25.4 during 1991–2008, which reduced to 5.3–10.8 during 2009–2017 after the introduction of BPHS project.MMR and neonatal visit rate also showed different trends before and after 2009 (online supplementary file 2). The MMR and neonatal visit rate ranged between 65.6–78.1 and 81.4–86.7, respectively before the introduction of BPHS project, and went up to a range of 80.9–91.6 and 87.1–93.9 after the intervention.As presented in table 1 and figures 1–4, the segmented regression results showed that the trend of the yearly national MMR was −0.57 (95% CI: −0.85 to −0.28, p<0.01) after the interventions of BPHS project in 2009, which indicate a yearly decline of 0.57 neonatal death per 1000 live births. The gap of NMR between urban and rural areas show the decreasing trend after the introduction of BPHS project, with a decline of 0.49 annually, which indicate the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas continuous to narrow. For the MMR and neonatal visit rate, the trend slowly increased before the introduction of BPHS project in 2009. There was an immediate increase in MMR (4.75, 95% CI: 1.86 to 7.63, p<0.01) and neonatal visit rate (2.88, 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.61, p<0.01), respectively when the interventions were introduced (table 1 and figures 1–4). The trend of all the rates showed rapid increases of postintervention, with all results being statistically significant.
Table 1
Estimated level and trend changes of national NMR, the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas, maternal health management rate and neonatal visit rate before and after the interventions outcome variables
Outcome variables
β
t
P value
95% CI
NMR (per 1000 live births)
Intercept
34.42
65.70
<0.01
–
Baseline trend
−1.34
−27.78
<0.01
−1.44 to −1.24
Level change
−0.83
−0.91
0.37
−2.72 to 1.05
Trend change
−0.57
−4.12
<0.01
−0.85 to −0.28
The gap of NMR between urban and rural areas(per 1000 live births)
Intercept
24.95
39.64
<0.01
–
Baseline trend
−1.07
−18.48
<0.01
−1.19 to −0.95
Level change
0.97
0.88
0.39
−1.30 to 3.23
Trend change
−0.49
−2.94
<0.01
−0.83 to −0.14
Maternal health management rate (%)
Intercept
77.36
75.27
<0.01
–
Baseline trend
−0.04
−0.21
0.83
−0.43 to 0.35
Level change
4.75
3.53
<0.01
1.86 to 7.63
Trend change
1.21
6.60
<0.01
0.81 to 1.60
Neonatal visit rate (%)
Intercept
86.07
139.41
<0.01
–
Baseline trend
−0.13
−1.16
0.27
−0.36 to 0.11
Level change
2.88
3.56
<0.01
1.14 to 4.61
Trend change
0.85
7.79
<0.01
0.62 to 1.09
NMR, neonatal mortality rate.
Estimated level and trend changes of national NMR, the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas, maternal health management rate and neonatal visit rate before and after the interventions outcome variablesNMR, neonatal mortality rate.Level and trend changes of national NMR before and after the interventions. BPHS, Basic Public Health Service; NMR, neonatal mortality rate.Level and trend changes of the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas before and after the intervention. BPHS, Basic Public Health Service; NMR, neonatal mortality rate.Level and trend changes of maternal health management rate before and after the interventions. BPHS, Basic Public Health Service.Level and trend changes of neonatal visit rate before and after the interventions. BPHS, Basic Public Health Service.The Pearson correlation analysis results indicated a strong negative correlation between national NMR and MMRs as well as neonatal visit rates. The correlation between NMR and MMRs was −0.79 (p<0.01), and the correlation between NMR and neonatal visit rate was −0.76 (p<0.01).
Discussion
This study observed the continuous decreasing trend of the national NMR and the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas before and after the introduction of BPHS project, while the neonatal related service volume kept a decreasing or slowly increasing trend from 2000 to 2008, and the trends changed into rapid increasing from 2009 to 2017 after the introduction of BPHS project.These results indicated that the national NMR was further decreased and the neonatal related services were increased with the implementation of the BPHS project, the inequality and disparities between urban and rural areas were also diminishing. The effectiveness of BPHS project confirmed the importance of project design and government commitment in improving neonatal health services and reducing NMR.26 27The BPHS project had a national coverage and abundant government funding compared with previous programmes. The neonatal related health services in BPHS project covered almost all the key stages from foetal formation to neonatal.28 29 Maternal health management was designed to start from early pregnancy to postpartum period, in order to fully monitor the growth and development of the foetus, and reducing the incidence of low birth weight and birth defects. The neonatal visit helped to ensure the health status of the newborns through physical examination and health education to the parents. The BPHS project was designed to achieve the full cycle of health monitoring and healthcare for newborns from pregnancy to neonatal, which could be key to its effectiveness. The evidences in India,28 Brazil30 and many LMICs showed that they had achieved significant decrease in NMR through maternal and neonatal health services, at least three times of antenatal care and postpartum care31 were provided during the whole pregnancy, which confirmed the potential effect of maternal and neonatal health services in reducing NMR.The segmented linear regression analysis showed the effectiveness of BPHS project on improving neonatal related health services. There were statistically significant immediate effects in improving MMRs and neonatal visit rates. Statistically significant long-term effects on these neonatal related services were also shown, since it kept a decreasing trend before the introduction of the project. It implied that the neonatal related health services of the BPHS project was not a one-time campaign but rather resulted in long-term benefit, essential for the continuous improving on neonatal health services.The regression results of national NMR and the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas showed both significant descending trend before and after the introduction of BPHS project, but the descending trends were slower compared with the trends before the introduction of BPHS project. The slower decreasing trend may be due to the boundary effect. It had been reported that the national NMR is more likely to be affected by the rural NMR,32 33 which could be also explained in Chinese condition. The NMR in rural areas presented a more rapid decreasing trend from 1991 to 2008 which decreased from 37.9 to 12.3 per 1000 live births and then decreased from 10.8 to 5.3 per 1000 live births from 2009 to 2017. It is difficult to keep the same rapid decreasing trend when the NMR has already been reduced to a relatively low level. Compared with urban areas, where it took 14 years to reduce NMR from 10.6 to 5.0 per 1000 live births from 1995 to 2008, it took only 9 years for rural areas to reduce NMR from 10.8 to 5.3 per 1000 live births from 2009 to 2017 after the introduction of BPHS project. Meanwhile, the ratio of rural to urban NMR narrowed from 3.0 to 2.5 from 1991 to 2008 after 17 years and the ratio had decreased from 2.4 to 2.0 after 9 years’ implementation of BPHS project from 2009 to 2017. These findings provided evidence in supporting of the effectiveness of BPHS project on improving neonatal health services, equality of health services and NMR reduction.China had achieved the target to further reduce NMR and to narrow the gap of NMR between urban and rural areas partly through the implementation of the BPHS project. However, many LMICs, especially African countries still have low levels of neonatal health services and high levels of NMR. The BPHS project in China provided an example for other LMICs on how to carry out continuous, high-quality neonatal health services with the support of relevant evidence. First, the central and provincial government need to provide subsidies for the community health centres to cover the cost of maternal health management and neonatal visit. This approach could reduce the financial pressures on primary medical institutions. Second, the project should be designed to cover all the maternal and neonatal populations, regardless of their socioeconomic status or urban/ rural household and so on. This approach increased the equality and coverage of the neonatal healthcare services. Third, the neonatal services should be provided by trained medical staffs and should be preventative in nature. Health examinations can help identifying higher risk newborns and facilitate timely interventions. This approach reflects the combination of population strategy and high-risk strategy.Our study has several limitations. First, the data regarding the causes of the neonatal death were not available, which limited our ability to analyse the risk factors of the neonatal mortality and advise future policies on NMR reduction. Furthermore, due to limited data accessibility, this study did not assess the effectiveness of the BPHS project at the provincial or county levels, nor did it control for other factors affecting the neonatal health outcomes, such as neonatal care quality,34 delivery place35 and so on.
Conclusion
The BPHS project, a national project funded by the Chinese government, played an important role in improving neonatal health services, further reducing NMR and diminishing inequality in healthcare between urban and rural areas. This case study provides evidence for other LMICs to implement organisational and structural changes in reducing NMR and improve neonatal care.Future studies could focus on assessing the effectiveness of the BPHS project at provincial or county levels in order to understand to mechanism behind the NMR reduction. The fact that the decreasing rate of NMR was slower after the project introduction in 2009 also needs further monitoring and exploration.
Authors: M J Sankar; S B Neogi; J Sharma; M Chauhan; R Srivastava; P K Prabhakar; A Khera; R Kumar; S Zodpey; V K Paul Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Chunhua He; Li Liu; Yue Chu; Jamie Perin; Li Dai; Xiaohong Li; Lei Miao; Leni Kang; Qi Li; Robert Scherpbier; Sufang Guo; Igor Rudan; Peige Song; Kit Yee Chan; Yan Guo; Robert E Black; Yanping Wang; Jun Zhu Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Stephen Agboola; Mariana Simons; Sara Golas; Jorn Op den Buijs; Jennifer Felsted; Nils Fischer; Linda Schertzer; Allison Orenstein; Kamal Jethwani; Joseph Kvedar Journal: JMIR Aging Date: 2018-08-01
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Daniel Hogan; Jamie Perin; Igor Rudan; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 79.321