Literature DB >> 32690705

Co-option of the lineage-specific LAVA retrotransposon in the gibbon genome.

Mariam Okhovat1, Kimberly A Nevonen2, Brett A Davis2, Pryce Michener2, Samantha Ward2, Mark Milhaven3, Lana Harshman4,5, Ajuni Sohota4,5, Jason D Fernandes6,7, Sofie R Salama6,7,8, Rachel J O'Neill9,10, Nadav Ahituv4,5, Krishna R Veeramah3, Lucia Carbone1,11,12,13.   

Abstract

Co-option of transposable elements (TEs) to become part of existing or new enhancers is an important mechanism for evolution of gene regulation. However, contributions of lineage-specific TE insertions to recent regulatory adaptations remain poorly understood. Gibbons present a suitable model to study these contributions as they have evolved a lineage-specific TE called LAVA (LINE-AluSz-VNTR-Alu LIKE), which is still active in the gibbon genome. The LAVA retrotransposon is thought to have played a role in the emergence of the highly rearranged structure of the gibbon genome by disrupting transcription of cell cycle genes. In this study, we investigated whether LAVA may have also contributed to the evolution of gene regulation by adopting enhancer function. We characterized fixed and polymorphic LAVA insertions across multiple gibbons and found 96 LAVA elements overlapping enhancer chromatin states. Moreover, LAVA was enriched in multiple transcription factor binding motifs, was bound by an important transcription factor (PU.1), and was associated with higher levels of gene expression in cis We found gibbon-specific signatures of purifying/positive selection at 27 LAVA insertions. Two of these insertions were fixed in the gibbon lineage and overlapped with enhancer chromatin states, representing putative co-opted LAVA enhancers. These putative enhancers were located within genes encoding SETD2 and RAD9A, two proteins that facilitate accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks and prevent chromosomal rearrangement mutations. Co-option of LAVA in these genes may have influenced regulation of processes that preserve genome integrity. Our findings highlight the importance of considering lineage-specific TEs in studying evolution of gene regulatory elements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; cis-regulatory element; co-option; transcription factor binding; transposable element

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32690705      PMCID: PMC7431028          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006038117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  66 in total

1.  SVA elements: a hominid-specific retroposon family.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Jinchuan Xing; Deepak Grover; Dale J Hedges; Kyudong Han; Jerilyn A Walker; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Computational tools to unmask transposable elements.

Authors:  Patricia Goerner-Potvin; Guillaume Bourque
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Hominoid composite non-LTR retrotransposons-variety, assembly, evolution, and structural determinants of mobilization.

Authors:  Bianca Ianc; Cornelia Ochis; Robert Persch; Octavian Popescu; Annette Damert
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Chromatin-state discovery and genome annotation with ChromHMM.

Authors:  Jason Ernst; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities.

Authors:  Sven Heinz; Christopher Benner; Nathanael Spann; Eric Bertolino; Yin C Lin; Peter Laslo; Jason X Cheng; Cornelis Murre; Harinder Singh; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Wnt antagonist SFRP1 functions as a secreted mediator of senescence.

Authors:  David J Elzi; Meihua Song; Kevin Hakala; Susan T Weintraub; Yuzuru Shiio
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, S- and G2-phase-specific cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair.

Authors:  Raj K Pandita; Girdhar G Sharma; Andrei Laszlo; Kevin M Hopkins; Scott Davey; Mikhail Chakhparonian; Arun Gupta; Raymund J Wellinger; Junran Zhang; Simon N Powell; Joseph L Roti Roti; Howard B Lieberman; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Acute loss of TET function results in aggressive myeloid cancer in mice.

Authors:  Jungeun An; Edahí González-Avalos; Ashu Chawla; Mira Jeong; Isaac F López-Moyado; Wei Li; Margaret A Goodell; Lukas Chavez; Myunggon Ko; Anjana Rao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The UCSC repeat browser allows discovery and visualization of evolutionary conflict across repeat families.

Authors:  David Haussler; Sofie R Salama; Maximilian Haeussler; Jason D Fernandes; Armando Zamudio-Hurtado; Hiram Clawson; W James Kent
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-03-31
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Roles of transposable elements in the regulation of mammalian transcription.

Authors:  Raquel Fueyo; Julius Judd; Cedric Feschotte; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 113.915

2.  Genomic features underlie the co-option of SVA transposons as cis-regulatory elements in human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Samantha M Barnada; Andrew Isopi; Daniela Tejada-Martinez; Clément Goubert; Sruti Patoori; Luca Pagliaroli; Mason Tracewell; Marco Trizzino
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.020

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.