Literature DB >> 32690398

Differences in cancer patients' and clinicians' preferences for disclosure of uncertain genomic tumor testing results.

Anny T Fenton1, Eric C Anderson1, Elizabeth Scharnetzki1, Kate Reed2, Emily Edelman2, Andrey Antov2, Jens Rueter2, Paul K J Han3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinicians' and patients' preferences for disclosure of genomic tumor testing (GTT) results; to determine the sensitivity of these disclosure preferences to uncertainty about the actionability of results; and to explore factors associated with disclosure preferences.
METHODS: Community-based oncology clinicians (n = 94) and patients (n = 1121) were surveyed about their preferences for disclosing GTT results with varying levels of uncertainty (Tiers 1, 2, 3). Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were used to compare clinicians' and patients' disclosure preferences and their sensitivity to uncertainty, and to explore associations between disclosure preferences and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors.
RESULTS: Relatively more patients than clinicians preferred disclosure, and their preferences were less sensitive to the uncertainty of GTT results. For patients and clinicians, lower uncertainty sensitivity was associated with positive GTT attitudes; for patients it was also associated with greater uncertainty tolerance and knowledge of uncertainty in GTT.
CONCLUSION: Relatively more cancer patients than clinicians prefer disclosure of GTT results, and their preferences are less sensitive to result uncertainty. Uncertainty sensitivity in disclosure preferences is associated with GTT-related attitudes and uncertainty tolerance. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Differences in cancer patients' and clinicians' preferences for disclosure of uncertain GTT results warrant greater attention in cancer care.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Genomic tumor testing; Patient-provider communications; Uncertainty tolerance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32690398     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  2 in total

1.  Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Alessia Costa; Věra Franková; Glenn Robert; Milan Macek; Christine Patch; Elizabeth Alexander; Anna Arellanesova; Jill Clayton-Smith; Amy Hunter; Markéta Havlovicová; Radka Pourová; Marie Pritchard; Lauren Roberts; Veronika Zoubková; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting.

Authors:  Megan C Best; Phyllis Butow; Jacqueline Savard; Chris Jacobs; Nicole Bartley; Grace Davies; Christine E Napier; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Barbara Biesecker; Katherine M Tucker; Ilona Juraskova; Bettina Meiser; Timothy Schlub; Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.351

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.