Aravanan Anbu Chakkarapani1, Hilary E Whyte2, Edith Massé3, Michael Castaldo4, Junmin Yang5, Kyong-Soon Lee6. 1. Division of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neonatology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar, United Arab Emirates; Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar, United Arab Emirates. 2. Division of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 4. Division of Neonatology, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 5. Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Department of Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Division of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: kyong-soon.lee@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Transport teams perform multiple procedural interventions during the stabilization of critically ill neonates. The setting of this study was a national cohort of interfacility neonatal transports from nontertiary centers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of neonatal transports having interventional procedures using the Canadian Neonatal Transport Network database during 2014 to 2016. Demographics and procedures associated with stabilization times ≤ 120 versus > 120 minutes were analyzed. Predictors of stabilization time were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 3,350 neonatal transports analyzed, the 3 most frequently performed procedures were peripheral intravenous insertion, arterial blood gas sampling, and endotracheal tube insertion, with success rates of 85.2%, 89.1%, and 95.3%, respectively. The frequency of procedures varied across gestational age subgroups, and success rates were lower for umbilical arterial catheter insertions. After adjustment for confounders, more invasive procedures and a higher number of interventions were associated with longer stabilization times. CONCLUSION: The type and frequency of procedures performed had a significant impact on stabilization time. Any procedures that are nonessential for stabilization at the nontertiary center, such as umbilical arterial catheter insertion, could be minimized to promote timely admission to tertiary centers. The demonstrated variations in procedural success among teams provide useful information for benchmarking and promote the sharing of training practices.
OBJECTIVE: Transport teams perform multiple procedural interventions during the stabilization of critically ill neonates. The setting of this study was a national cohort of interfacility neonatal transports from nontertiary centers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of neonatal transports having interventional procedures using the Canadian Neonatal Transport Network database during 2014 to 2016. Demographics and procedures associated with stabilization times ≤ 120 versus > 120 minutes were analyzed. Predictors of stabilization time were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 3,350 neonatal transports analyzed, the 3 most frequently performed procedures were peripheral intravenous insertion, arterial blood gas sampling, and endotracheal tube insertion, with success rates of 85.2%, 89.1%, and 95.3%, respectively. The frequency of procedures varied across gestational age subgroups, and success rates were lower for umbilical arterial catheter insertions. After adjustment for confounders, more invasive procedures and a higher number of interventions were associated with longer stabilization times. CONCLUSION: The type and frequency of procedures performed had a significant impact on stabilization time. Any procedures that are nonessential for stabilization at the nontertiary center, such as umbilical arterial catheter insertion, could be minimized to promote timely admission to tertiary centers. The demonstrated variations in procedural success among teams provide useful information for benchmarking and promote the sharing of training practices.