| Literature DB >> 32689933 |
Lauren LeMay-Nedjelski1,2, James Butcher3, Sylvia H Ley4, Michelle R Asbury1,2, Anthony J Hanley1, Alex Kiss5, Sharon Unger1,6,7,8, Julia K Copeland9, Pauline W Wang9, Bernard Zinman9, Alain Stintzi3, Deborah L O'Connor10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined how maternal body mass index (BMI), mode of delivery and ethnicity affect the microbial composition of human milk and none have examined associations with maternal metabolic status. Given the high prevalence of maternal adiposity and impaired glucose metabolism, we systematically investigated the associations between these maternal factors in women ≥20 years and milk microbial composition and predicted functionality by V4-16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (NCT01405547; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01405547 ). Demographic data, weight, height, and a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test were gathered at 30 (95% CI: 25-33) weeks gestation, and milk samples were collected at 3 months post-partum (n = 113).Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Caesarean delivery; Ethnicity; Gestational diabetes; Human milk; Impaired glucose tolerance; Microbiome; Microbiota; Mode of delivery; Vaginal delivery
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32689933 PMCID: PMC7372813 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01901-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Baseline characteristics of mothers
| Baseline variables | |
|---|---|
| Mean age (y), mean ± SD | 34.2 ± 4.2 |
| Ethnicity, No. (%) | |
| White | 64 (56.6%) |
| Asian (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Filipino) | 27 (23.9%) |
| Other (South Asian, Black, other) | 22 (19.5%) |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI1 (kg/m2), | |
| Mean ± SD | 24.3 ± 4.6 |
| Obese (> 30 kg/m2), No. (%) | 11 (9.7%) |
| Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), No (%) | 30 (26.5%) |
| Healthy (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), No (%) | 72 (63.7%) |
| 3-month post-partum BMI1 (kg/m2), | |
| Mean ± SD | 26.4 ± 5.2 |
| Obese (> 30 kg/m2), No. (%) | 17 (15.0%) |
| Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), No. (%) | 46 (40.7%) |
| Healthy (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), No. (%) | 50 (44.2%) |
| Glucose tolerance status, No. (%) | |
| Gestational diabetes mellitus | 24 (21.2%) |
| Impaired glucose tolerance | 20 (17.7%) |
| Normoglycemic | 69 (61.1%) |
| Mode of delivery, No. (%) | |
| Vaginal | 64 (56.6%) |
| Scheduled Caesarean section | 21 (18.6%) |
| Unscheduled Caesarean section | 28 (24.8%) |
1BMI Body mass index
Fig. 1Microbial relative abundance in human milk at the phylum level (n = 109). The relative abundances of bacterial phyla in collected human milk samples are visualized using bar plots. For simplicity, only the most abundant 5 phyla are displayed with other phyla merged into the Other category
Fig. 2Microbial relative abundance in human milk at the genus level (n = 109). The relative abundances of bacterial genera in collected human milk samples are visualized using bar plots. For simplicity, only the most abundant 10 genera are displayed with other genera merged into the Other category
Fig. 3a-e The association between maternal characteristics and human milk microbiota alpha-diversity. The bacterial richness (Chao1 index) and diversity (Shannon index) of each human milk sample are plotted using box and whisker plots (mid-line = median; upper and lower bounds of the box = first and third quartile) as a function of a maternal glucose tolerance, b mode of delivery, c pre-pregnancy BMI, d 3-month post-partum BMI, e ethnicity. Multivariable linear regression analyses revealed no significant associations between the alpha-diversity of the milk microbiota and maternal metabolic and obstetrical characteristics. Abbreviations: GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus, IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; Sched CS, scheduled C-section; Unsched CS, unscheduled C-section
Associations between maternal characteristics and top 5 phyla and top 10 genera: Grouped by BMI
| Taxa | Group effect | Pairwise comparison | IRR | 95% CI | Pairwise comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteobacteria | 0.019 | Obese vs overweight | 0.62 | 0.43–0.90 | 0.012 |
| Overweight vs healthy | 1.23 | 1.00–1.50 | 0.045 | ||
| Bacteroidetes | 0.0051 | Obese vs overweight | 3.70 | 1.61–8.48 | 0.002 |
| Obese vs healthy | 2.56 | 1.27–5.17 | 0.0086 | ||
| 0.011 | Obese vs overweight | 2.50 | 1.09–5.72 | 0.031 | |
| Obese vs healthy | 3.15 | 1.47–6.76 | 0.0032 | ||
| 0.0003 | Obese vs overweight | 5.13 | 1.79–14.70 | 0.0023 | |
| Obese vs healthy | 4.98 | 2.11–11.74 | 0.0002 | ||
| < 0.0001 | Overweight vs healthy | 8.72 | 3.24–23.48 | < 0.0001 | |
| < 0.0001 | Unscheduled C-section vs vaginal | 16.70 | 5.99–46.57 | < 0.0001 | |
| Scheduled C-section vs unscheduled C-section | 0.071 | 0.011–0.46 | 0.0053 | ||
| Actinobacteria | 0.0058 | Obese vs overweight | 2.34 | 1.38–3.98 | 0.0017 |
| Obese vs healthy | 2.02 | 1.18–3.46 | 0.010 | ||
| < 0.0001 | Obese vs overweight | 4.84 | 2.19–10.72 | 0.0001 | |
| Obese vs healthy | 7.77 | 2.95–20.43 | < 0.0001 | ||
| 0.0005 | Obese vs overweight | 8.89 | 2.29–34.57 | 0.016 | |
| Obese vs healthy | 9.56 | 2.17–42.22 | 0.0029 | ||
| < 0.0001 | Unscheduled C-section vs vaginal | 13.01 | 4.01–42.20 | < 0.0001 | |
| Scheduled C-section vs unscheduled C-section | 0.08 | 0.013–0.62 | 0.015 | ||
Separate Poisson regression models were run for pre-pregnancy BMI and 3-month post-partum BMI, while adjusting for maternal glucose tolerance status, mode of delivery, DNA extraction batch, and PCR sequencing batch. Statistically significant main group effect findings shown only (group effect: p ≤ 0.022 for phylum, p ≤ 0.017 for genus; pairwise comparison: p < 0.05). An interaction term between pre-pregnancy BMI and maternal glucose tolerance status was found to be statistically significant for Gemella. No other statistically significant interactions were found between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and glucose tolerance status. Gemella showed an increased incidence among mothers with an overweight BMI (versus healthy BMI) and concurrent gestational diabetes IRR, CI (5.96 [1.85–19.21], p = 0.0028). An increased incidence of Gemella was also observed in mothers with an obese BMI and concurrent impaired glucose tolerance versus both mothers with overweight (11.42 [1.49–87.67], p = 0.019) and healthy weight BMIs (4.04 [1.63–10.01], p = 0.0026). Abbreviations: confidence interval CI, incidence rate ratio, IRR
Associations between ethnicity and the top 5 phyla and top 10 genera
| Taxa | Group effect | Pairwise comparison | IRR | 95% CI | Pairwise comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0008 | White vs other | 0.27 | 0.12–0.59 | 0.001 | |
| Asian vs other | 0.17 | 0.049–0.63 | 0.0075 | ||
| 0.0051 | White vs Asian | 0.084 | 0.015–0.46 | 0.0042 | |
| 0.022 | Asian vs other | 0.020 | 0.0007–0.59 | 0.023 | |
Ethnicity was investigated for all taxa and models were adjusted for DNA extraction and PCR sequencing batch effects. Statistically significant findings shown only (group effect: p ≤ 0.022 for phylum, p ≤ 0.017 for genus; pairwise comparison: p < 0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between ethnicity and any phylum-level taxa. Other: pooled South Asian, Black, other. Abbreviations: confidence interval, CI, incidence rate ratio, IRR