Literature DB >> 32688388

Aspects of Technology That Influence Athletic Trainers' Current Patient Care Documentation Strategies in the Secondary School.

Sara L Nottingham1, Tricia M Kasamatsu2, Lindsey E Eberman3, Elizabeth R Neil4, Cailee E Welch Bacon5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous research on athletic trainers' (ATs) documentation practices in the secondary school setting has focused on users of 1 electronic medical record (EMR) platform. These studies have identified that ATs use multiple platforms for documentation, including paper, even when an EMR is available.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the documentation practices of ATs who use various forms of patient care documentation, including paper, EMRs, or both.
DESIGN: Qualitative study.
SETTING: Individual telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty ATs participated in this study: 12 women and 8 men who averaged 38 ± 14 years of age, 15 ± 13 years of clinical experience, and 11 ± 11 years of employment at their current secondary school. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted to gain insight into ATs' documentation practices. Three researchers and 2 auditors inductively coded the transcripts using a consensual qualitative research process that consisted of 4 rounds of consensus coding and determination of data saturation. Trustworthiness was addressed with member checking, multiple-analyst triangulation, and peer review.
RESULTS: The ATs' documentation practices were largely influenced by technology, organized in 3 themes. Participants' current documentation strategies included the use of both paper and EMRs, as they found different benefits to using each platform. Oftentimes documentation practices were shaped by technological challenges, including unreliable networks, software design problems, and the lack of a streamlined approach. Lastly, participants identified future strategies for improving documentation, including the need for better EMR options and streamlining their individual documentation behaviors.
CONCLUSIONS: Many ATs wanted to incorporate EMRs in their clinical practice but faced challenges when attempting to do so. In turn, clinicians often duplicated documentation or used 2 platforms. Athletic trainers should communicate with administrators to select an EMR that fits their documentation needs and seek resources, such as network access and educational opportunities, to learn how to use EMRs. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic medical records; medical records; qualitative research; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32688388      PMCID: PMC7462177          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-405-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  15 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital.

Authors:  Alice A Whittaker; Marilee Aufdenkamp; Susan Tinley
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.176

2.  An electronic documentation system improves the quality of admission notes: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Trevor Jamieson; Jonathan Ailon; Vince Chien; Ophyr Mourad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record.

Authors:  Siddhartha Yadav; Noora Kazanji; Narayan K C; Sudarshan Paudel; John Falatko; Sandor Shoichet; Michael Maddens; Michael A Barnes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care.

Authors:  Andrea D Lopes Sauers; Eric L Sauers; Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Athletic Trainers' Reasons for and Mechanics of Documenting Patient Care: A Report From the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Sara L Nottingham; Kenneth C Lam; Tricia M Kasamatsu; Bradly L Eppelheimer; Cailee E Welch Bacon
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Ann Baumann; Jannah Baker; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Daniel Dunham; Marshall H Chin; Rebecca Bielang; Emily O Kistner; Theodore G Karrison; Michael K Ong; Urmimala Sarkar; Margaret A McLaughlin; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-22

8.  Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Barriers to Patient Care Documentation: A Report From the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Cailee E Welch Bacon; Bradly L Eppelheimer; Tricia M Kasamatsu; Kenneth C Lam; Sara L Nottingham
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  A ward-based time study of paper and electronic documentation for recording vital sign observations.

Authors:  David Wong; Timothy Bonnici; Julia Knight; Stephen Gerry; James Turton; Peter Watkinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The effect of electronic health record software design on resident documentation and compliance with evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Yasaira Rodriguez Torres; Jordan Huang; Melanie Mihlstin; Mark S Juzych; Heidi Kromrei; Frank S Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Documentation Practices of Athletic Trainers Employed in the Clinic, Physician Practice, and Emerging Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Sara L Nottingham; Tricia M Kasamatsu; Cailee E Welch Bacon
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.