Literature DB >> 32687804

Safety and immunogenicity of the live attenuated intranasal pertussis vaccine BPZE1: a phase 1b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study.

Maja Jahnmatz1, Laura Richert2, Nabil Al-Tawil3, Jann Storsaeter1, Céline Colin4, Claire Bauduin4, Marcel Thalen5, Ken Solovay5, Keith Rubin5, Nathalie Mielcarek6, Rigmor Thorstensson1, Camille Locht7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term protection and herd immunity induced by existing pertussis vaccines are imperfect, and a need therefore exists to develop new pertussis vaccines. This study aimed to investigate the safety, colonisation, and immunogenicity of the new, live attenuated pertussis vaccine, BPZE1, when given intranasally.
METHODS: This phase 1b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study was done at the phase 1 unit, Karolinska Trial Alliance, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Healthy adults (18-32 years) were screened and included sequentially into three groups of increasing BPZE1 dose strength (107 colony-forming units [CFU], 108 CFU, and 109 CFU), and were randomly assigned (3:1 within each group) to receive vaccine or placebo. Vaccine and placebo were administered in phosphate-buffered saline contained 5% saccharose as 0·4 mL in each nostril. The primary outcome was solicited and unsolicited adverse events between day 0 and day 28. The analysis included all randomised participants who received a vaccine dose. Colonisation with BPZE1 was determined by repeatedly culturing nasopharyngeal aspirates at day 4, day 7, day 11, day 14, day 21, and day 28 after vaccination. Immunogenicity, as serum IgG and IgA responses were assessed at day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28, 6 months, and 12 months after vaccination. This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02453048.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2015, and Feb 3, 2016, 120 participants were assessed for eligibility, 48 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned (3:1) to receive vaccine or placebo, with 12 participants each in a low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose vaccine group. Adverse events between day 0 and day 28 were reported by one (8%, 95% CI 0-39) of 12 participants in both the placebo and low-dose groups, and two (17%; 2-48) of 12 participants in both the medium-dose and high-dose groups, including cough of grade 2 or more, oropharyngeal pain, and rhinorrhoea and nasal congestion. During this time, none of the participants experienced any spasmodic cough, difficulties in breathing, or adverse events following immunisation concerning vital signs. The tested doses of BPZE1 or placebo were well tolerated, with no apparent difference in solicited or unsolicited adverse events following immunisation between groups. Colonisation at least once after vaccination was observed in 29 (81%; 68-93) of 36 vaccinated participants. The tested vaccine doses were immunogenic, with increases in serum IgG and IgA titres against the four B pertussis antigens from baseline to 12 months.
INTERPRETATION: The tested vaccine was safe, induced a high colonisation rate in an adult population, and was immunogenic at all doses. These findings justify further clinical development of BPZE1 to ultimately be used as a priming vaccine for neonates or a booster vaccine for adolescents and adults, or both. FUNDING: ILiAD Biotechnologies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32687804     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30274-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  13 in total

1.  Lessons from a mature acellular pertussis vaccination program and strategies to overcome suboptimal vaccine effectiveness.

Authors:  Ousseny Zerbo; Bruce Fireman; Nicola P Klein
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.683

2.  Live attenuated pertussis vaccine for prevention and treatment of allergic airway inflammation in mice.

Authors:  Thomas Belcher; Saliha Ait-Yahia; Luis Solans; Anne-Sophie Debrie; Stephane Cauchi; Anne Tsicopoulos; Camille Locht
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 9.399

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: The Mucosal Immunity Imperative.

Authors:  Eli Y Adashi; Philip A Gruppuso
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 11.104

4.  Intranasal inoculation with Bordetella pertussis confers protection without inducing classical whooping cough in baboons.

Authors:  Thibaut Naninck; Vanessa Contreras; Loïc Coutte; Sébastien Langlois; Aurélie Hébert-Ribon; Magali Pelletier; Nathalie Reveneau; Camille Locht; Catherine Chapon; Roger Le Grand
Journal:  Curr Res Microb Sci       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 5.  Evaluation of Anti-PT Antibody Response after Pertussis Vaccination and Infection: The Importance of Both Quantity and Quality.

Authors:  Alex-Mikael Barkoff; Aapo Knuutila; Jussi Mertsola; Qiushui He
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Manufacture of a Stable Lyophilized Formulation of the Live Attenuated Pertussis Vaccine BPZE1.

Authors:  Marcel Thalen; Anne-Sophie Debrie; Loic Coutte; Dominique Raze; Ken Solovay; Keith Rubin; Nathalie Mielcarek; Camille Locht
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-13

Review 7.  The Path to New Pediatric Vaccines against Pertussis.

Authors:  Camille Locht
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05

Review 8.  Mucosal vaccines - fortifying the frontiers.

Authors:  Ed C Lavelle; Ross W Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 108.555

Review 9.  The History of Pertussis Toxin.

Authors:  Camille Locht; Rudy Antoine
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Mucosal Immunization Against Pertussis: Lessons From the Past and Perspectives.

Authors:  Violaine Dubois; Camille Locht
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.