Literature DB >> 32686748

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients.

Eva Hollemans1, Esther I Verhoef2, Chris H Bangma3, John Rietbergen4, Susanne Osanto5, Rob C M Pelger6, Tom van Wezel7, Henk van der Poel8, Elise Bekers9, Jozien Helleman3, Monique J Roobol3, Geert J L H van Leenders2.   

Abstract

The Gleason score is an important parameter for clinical outcome in prostate cancer patients. Gleason score 8 is a heterogeneous disease including Gleason score 3 + 5, 4 + 4, and 5 + 3 tumors, and encompasses a broad range of tumor growth patterns. Our objective was to characterize individual growth patterns and identify prognostic parameters in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients. We reviewed 1064 radical prostatectomy specimens, recorded individual Gleason 4 and 5 growth patterns as well as presence of intraductal carcinoma, and evaluated biochemical recurrence- and metastasis-free survival. Gleason score 8 disease was identified in 140 (13%) patients, of whom 76 (54%) had Gleason score 3 + 5, 46 (33%) 4 + 4, and 18 (13%) 5 + 3 disease. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (n = 87, 62%) was observed more frequently in Gleason score 4 + 4 (93%) than 3 + 5 (47%; P < 0.001) and 5 + 3 (44%; P < 0.001) patients. Gleason pattern 5 was present in 110 (79%) men: as single cells and/or cords in 99 (90%) and solid fields in 32 (29%) cases. Solid field pattern 5 coexisted with cribriform architecture (23/32, 72%) more frequently than nonsolid pattern 5 cases (36/78, 46%, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis including age, prostate-specific antigen, pT-stage, surgical margin status, and lymph node metastases, presence of cribriform architecture was an independent parameter for biochemical recurrence-free (hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.7; P = 0.04) and metastasis-free (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.3; P = 0.05) survival. In conclusion, invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma occurs more frequently in Gleason score 4 + 4 prostate cancer patients than in Gleason score 3 + 5 and 5 + 3, and is an independent parameter for biochemical recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, cribriform architecture has added value in risk stratification of Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32686748      PMCID: PMC7806505          DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0625-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  2 in total

1.  Classification of prostatic carcinomas.

Authors:  D F Gleason
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

Review 2.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

  2 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Oncological outcomes of cribriform histology pattern in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Ivan Russo; Timo Soeterik; Ignacio Puche-Sanz; Giuseppe Broggi; Arturo Lo Giudice; Cosimo De Nunzio; Riccardo Lombardo; Giancarlo Marra; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 2.  Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Maria Destouni; Andreas C Lazaris; Vasiliki Tzelepi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management?

Authors:  Bartosz Małkiewicz; Miłosz Knura; Małgorzata Łątkowska; Maximilian Kobylański; Krystian Nagi; Dawid Janczak; Joanna Chorbińska; Wojciech Krajewski; Jakub Karwacki; Tomasz Szydełko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hans Pinckaers; Jolique van Ipenburg; Jonathan Melamed; Angelo De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz; Bram van Ginneken; Jeroen van der Laak; Geert Litjens
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 5.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  A distinct repertoire of cancer-associated fibroblasts is enriched in cribriform prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Brenda L Rios; Elysa M Wolf; Colby Tubbs; Hong Yuen Wong; Kerry R Schaffer; Tamara L Lotan; Giovanna A Giannico; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-02-18

7.  Clinicopathological Analysis of the ISUP Grade Group And Other Parameters in Prostate Cancer: Elucidation of Mutual Impact of the Various Parameters.

Authors:  Yoichiro Okubo; Shinya Sato; Kimito Osaka; Yayoi Yamamoto; Takahisa Suzuki; Arika Ida; Emi Yoshioka; Masaki Suzuki; Kota Washimi; Tomoyuki Yokose; Takeshi Kishida; Yohei Miyagi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.

Authors:  Helen Pantazopoulos; Mame-Kany Diop; Andrée-Anne Grosset; Frédérique Rouleau-Gagné; Afnan Al-Saleh; Teodora Boblea; Dominique Trudel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Assessment of MYC/PTEN Status by Gene-Protein Assay in Grade Group 2 Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Daniela C Salles; Thiago Vidotto; Farzana A Faisal; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Liana B Guedes; Andrea Muranyi; Isaac Bai; Shalini Singh; Dongyao Yan; Kandavel Shanmugam; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Tim Hansum; Eva Hollemans; Esther I Verhoef; Chris H Bangma; John Rietbergen; Susanne Osanto; Rob C M Pelger; Tom van Wezel; Henk van der Poel; Elise Bekers; Jozien Helleman; Sebastiaan Remmers; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.