| Literature DB >> 32685726 |
S M Didar-Ul Islam1, Md Bodrud-Doza2,3, Rafid Mahmud Khan2, Md Abidul Haque4, Mohammed A Mamun3,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has aggregated mental health sufferings throughout the entire world. Suicide completions are the extreme consequences of COVID-19 related psychological burdens, which was reported in many countries including Bangladesh. However, there are lack of study assessing COVID-19 related human stress and its' associations with other relevant factors affecting quality of life in the country, and which were explored in the present study.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladeshi people; COVID-19; Crisis; Mental health; Poverty; Psychology; Public health; Stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32685726 PMCID: PMC7350787 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1COVID-19 cases and deaths in Bangaldesh as of 29 June 2020.
Figure 2Research methodology flowchart.
Descriptive statistics of the factors related to COVID-19 stress (n=340).
| Items | Mean | Std. error of mean | Median | Mode | Std. Dev. | Variance | Skewness | Kurtosis | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 created fear in life (S1) | 4.67 | 0.08 | 5 | 5 | 1.45 | 2.11 | -1.21 | 0.54 | 1 | 6 |
| Afraid of taking any other health facilities or treatment (S2) | 3.94 | 0.10 | 5 | 5 | 1.79 | 3.19 | -0.57 | -1.09 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling economical stress (S3) | 4.45 | 0.09 | 5 | 6 | 1.64 | 2.70 | -0.89 | -0.40 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling stress in the fear of losing job (S4) | 3.16 | 0.10 | 3 | 1 | 1.93 | 3.74 | 0.17 | -1.52 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling stress in managing food (S5) | 3.86 | 0.09 | 4 | 5 | 1.69 | 2.87 | -0.46 | -1.09 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling stress for family members (S6) | 5.21 | 0.06 | 6 | 6 | 1.11 | 1.23 | -1.84 | 3.59 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling stress as formal education/study is hampered (S7) | 3.99 | 0.11 | 5 | 6 | 1.94 | 3.75 | -0.54 | -1.28 | 1 | 6 |
| Feeling stress while thinking about future career (S8) | 4.75 | 0.09 | 5 | 6 | 1.58 | 2.50 | -1.27 | 0.44 | 1 | 6 |
| Stress increases while getting the updated news from TV and social media about COVID-19 (S9) | 4.65 | 0.08 | 5 | 5 | 1.43 | 2.05 | -1.14 | 0.44 | 1 | 6 |
| Having insufficient sleep due to mental pressure (S10) | 3.62 | 0.09 | 4 | 6 | 1.74 | 3.03 | -0.16 | -1.24 | 1 | 6 |
| Mental pressure creating short temper (S11) | 3.78 | 0.10 | 4 | 6 | 1.81 | 3.28 | -0.29 | -1.29 | 1 | 6 |
| Mental pressure creating chaos in the family (S12) | 3.24 | 0.09 | 3 | 1 | 1.71 | 2.93 | 0.11 | -1.23 | 1 | 6 |
| Stress influence mind to commit suicide (S13) | 2.09 | 0.07 | 2 | 1 | 1.37 | 1.87 | 1.29 | 0.96 | 1 | 6 |
Figure 3Radar diagram showing the participants' perception of the causes of stress in the time of COVID-19 pandemic.
Pearson correlation matrix of the studied factors of human stress (significant values (>0.5) are in bold type face).
| Components | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| S2 | .422 | 1 | |||||||||||
| S3 | .245 | .332 | 1 | ||||||||||
| S4 | .191 | .174 | .440 | 1 | |||||||||
| S5 | .313 | .289 | .448 | 1 | |||||||||
| S6 | .430 | .297 | .294 | .140 | .286 | 1 | |||||||
| S7 | .107 | .131 | .123 | 0.06 | 0.079 | .260 | 1 | ||||||
| S8 | .187 | .110 | .326 | .294 | .174 | .403 | 1 | ||||||
| S9 | .394 | .402 | .167 | 0.097 | .213 | .235 | 0.078 | 0.067 | 1 | ||||
| S10 | .347 | .306 | .260 | .210 | .304 | .209 | .187 | .164 | .427 | 1 | |||
| S11 | .390 | .223 | .263 | .263 | .253 | .199 | 0.09 | 0.104 | .437 | 1 | |||
| S12 | .264 | .184 | .330 | .220 | .283 | .122 | 0.088 | 0.096 | .289 | .450 | 1 | ||
| S13 | .177 | .185 | .133 | .213 | .179 | 0.032 | 0.033 | 0.038 | .147 | .289 | .317 | .351 | 1 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Results of T-test indicating the association between studied factors and socio-demographics.
| Items | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | Mean Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Occupation | 23.048 | 339 | 0 | 2.51176 | 2.2974 | 2.7261 |
| Age | 75.658 | 339 | 0 | 26.22353 | 25.5418 | 26.9053 |
| Gender | 52.085 | 339 | 0 | 1.34118 | 1.2905 | 1.3918 |
| Marital status | 67.383 | 339 | 0 | 1.71765 | 1.6675 | 1.7678 |
| Presence | 58.263 | 339 | 0 | 1.56765 | 1.5147 | 1.6206 |
| MS | 59.98 | 339 | 0 | 1.14412 | 1.1066 | 1.1816 |
| S1 | 59.328 | 339 | 0 | 4.66765 | 4.5129 | 4.8224 |
| S2 | 40.652 | 339 | 0 | 3.93824 | 3.7477 | 4.1288 |
| S3 | 49.944 | 339 | 0 | 4.45294 | 4.2776 | 4.6283 |
| S4 | 30.187 | 339 | 0 | 3.16471 | 2.9585 | 3.3709 |
| S5 | 42.089 | 339 | 0 | 3.86471 | 3.6841 | 4.0453 |
| S6 | 86.697 | 339 | 0 | 5.20588 | 5.0878 | 5.324 |
| S7 | 37.952 | 339 | 0 | 3.98529 | 3.7787 | 4.1918 |
| S8 | 55.386 | 339 | 0 | 4.75 | 4.5813 | 4.9187 |
| S9 | 59.867 | 339 | 0 | 4.65 | 4.4972 | 4.8028 |
| S10 | 38.372 | 339 | 0 | 3.62353 | 3.4378 | 3.8093 |
| S11 | 38.505 | 339 | 0 | 3.77941 | 3.5863 | 3.9725 |
| S12 | 34.898 | 339 | 0 | 3.24118 | 3.0585 | 3.4239 |
| S13 | 28.258 | 339 | 0 | 2.09412 | 1.9484 | 2.2399 |
| Support | 61.697 | 339 | 0 | 1.62353 | 1.5718 | 1.6753 |
Varimax rotated principle components analysis of the studied factors.
| Items | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0.2 | 0.726 | 0.149 | 0.094 |
| S2 | 0.081 | 0.711 | 0.22 | -0.001 |
| S3 | 0.13 | 0.214 | 0.795 | 0.143 |
| S4 | 0.22 | -0.034 | 0.741 | 0.109 |
| S5 | 0.144 | 0.274 | 0.782 | 0.002 |
| S6 | -0.078 | 0.587 | 0.199 | 0.451 |
| S7 | 0.102 | 0.05 | -0.054 | 0.856 |
| S8 | 0.02 | 0.062 | 0.263 | 0.844 |
| S9 | 0.372 | 0.675 | -0.061 | -0.03 |
| S10 | 0.703 | 0.35 | 0.073 | 0.149 |
| S11 | 0.796 | 0.298 | 0.089 | 0.053 |
| S12 | 0.760 | 0.097 | 0.206 | 0.037 |
| S13 | 0.614 | -0.04 | 0.165 | -0.037 |
| Total | 2.37 | 2.184 | 2.062 | 1.719 |
| % of variance | 18.229 | 16.796 | 15.86 | 13.223 |
| Cumulative % | 18.229 | 35.025 | 50.885 | 64.109 |
Figure 4Principal component analysis by (a) scree plot of the characteristic roots, and (b) component plot in rotated space.
Figure 5Dendrogram showing the hierarchical clusters of analysed parameters.