| Literature DB >> 32685447 |
Xin Huang1, Zhi Wen2, Chen-Xing Qi1, Yan Tong1, Han-Dong Dan1, Bao-Jun Xie2, Yin Shen1,3.
Abstract
Previous neuroimaging studies demonstrated that visual deprivation triggers significant crossmodal plasticity in the functional and structural architecture of the brain. However, prior neuroimaging studies focused on the static brain activity in blindness. It remains unknown whether alterations of dynamic intrinsic brain activity occur in late blindness (LB). This study investigated dynamic intrinsic brain activity changes in individuals with late blindness by assessing the dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (dALFFs) using sliding-window analyses. Forty-one cases of late blindness (LB) (29 males and 12 females, mean age: 39.70 ± 12.66 years) and 48 sighted controls (SCs) (17 males and 31 females, mean age: 43.23 ± 13.40 years) closely matched in age, sex, and education level were enrolled in this study. The dALFF with sliding-window analyses was used to compare the difference in dynamic intrinsic brain activity between the two groups. Compared with SCs, individuals with LB exhibited significantly lower dALFF values in the bilateral lingual gyrus (LING)/calcarine (CAL) and left thalamus (THA). LB cases also showed considerably decreased dFC values between the bilateral LING/CAL and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and between the left THA and the right LING/cerebelum_6 (CER) (two-tailed, voxel-level P < 0.01, Gaussian random field (GRF) correction, cluster-level P < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that LB individuals showed lower-temporal variability of dALFF in the visual cortices and thalamus, suggesting lower flexibility of visual thalamocortical activity, which might reflect impaired visual processing in LB individuals. These findings indicate that abnormal dynamic intrinsic brain activity might be involved in the neurophysiological mechanisms of LB.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32685447 PMCID: PMC7327610 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1913805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Details of scanned parameters.
| Three-dimensional brain volume imaging (3D-BRAVO) | Gradient-echo-planar imaging sequence | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Repetition time/echo time | 8.5/3.3 | Repetition time/echo time | 2,000 ms/25 ms |
| Slice thickness | 1.0 mm | Slice thickness | 3.0 mm |
| Acquisition matrix | 256 × 256 | Gap | 1.2 mm |
| Field of view | 240 × 240 mm2 | Acquisition matrix | 64 × 64 |
| Flip angle | 12° | Flip angle | 90° |
| Field of view | 240 × 240 mm2 | ||
| Voxel size | 3.6 × 3.6 × 3.6 mm3 | ||
Demographic measurements between the two groups.
| LB group | SC group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 29/12 | 17/31 | 11.044 | 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 39.70 ± 12.66 | 43.23 ± 13.40 | -1.267 | 0.208 |
| Handedness | 41 R | 48 R | N/A | N/A |
| Age of onset blindness (years) | 22.56 ± 7.13 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
χ2 test for sex (n). Independent t test for the other normally distributed continuous data (means ± SD). LB: late blindness; SC: sighted controls; N/A: not applicable.
Figure 1Spatial patterns of dALFF variance were observed at the group level in LB and SC groups in the typical frequency band (0.01–0.08 Hz). Within group mean dALFF variance maps within the LB (a) and SC (b). dALFF: dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; LB: late blindness; SC: sighted controls; L: left; R: right.
Figure 2Comparison of different dALFF values between LB group and SC group. Significant dALFF values differences were observed in the B-LING/CAL, L-THA. The blue areas indicate lower dALFF values (voxel-level P < 0.01, GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05) (a). The mean values of altered dALFF values between the LB and SC groups (b). dALFF: dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; LB: late blindness; SC: sighted controls; GRF: Gaussian random field; LING: lingual gyrus; CAL: calcarine; THA: thalamus; L: left; B: bilateral;.
Significant differences in the dALFF between the two groups.
| Condition/brain regions | BA | Peak | MNI coordinates | Cluster size (voxels) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| ROI in B-LING/CAL | |||||||
| LB<SC | L-MFG | 8 | -4.2625 | -39 | 12 | 48 | 83 |
| ROI in L-THA | |||||||
| LB<SC | R-LING/CER | — | -4.1493 | 9 | -66 | -15 | 45 |
The statistical threshold was set at the voxel level with P < 0.01 for multiple comparisons using the Gaussian random field theory (voxel-level P < 0.01, GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05). dALFF: dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; LB: late blindness; SC: sighted control; LING: lingual gyrus; CAL: calcarine; THA: thalamus; B: bilateral; L: left; GRF: Gaussian random field.
Figure 3Comparison of different dFC values between LB group and SC group. Significant dFC values differences were observed in the L-MFG (a) and R-LING/CER (b). The blue areas indicate lower dFC values.(voxel-level P < 0.01, GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05) The mean values of altered dFC values between the LB and SC groups. (c, d). dFC: dynamic functional connectivity; LB: late blindness; SC: sighted controls; GRF: Gaussian random field; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; LING: lingual gyrus; CER: cerebelum_6; L: left; R: right.
Significant differences in dFC values between the two groups.
| Condition/brain regions | BA | Peak | MNI coordinates | Cluster size (voxels) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| LB<SC | B-LING/CAL | 18 | -4.5301 | 0 | -72 | 6 | 177 |
| LB<SC | L-THA | 18 | -3.7118 | -6 | -9 | 6 | 105 |
The statistical threshold was set at the voxel level with P < 0.01 for multiple comparisons using the Gaussian random field theory (voxel-level P < 0.01, GRF correction, cluster-level P < 0.05). dFC: dynamic functional connectivity; BA: Brodmann area; LB: late blindness; SC: sighted control; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; GRF: Gaussian random field; LING: lingual gyrus; CAL: calcarine; THA: thalamus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; CER: cerebelum_6.
Figure 4ROC curve analysis of the mean dALFF and dFC of altered brain regions. ROC curve in dALFF values: LB